Full Text:
<3646>
CLC number: TH16
On-line Access:
Received: 2008-05-06
Revision Accepted: 2008-10-15
Crosschecked: 2008-12-29
Cited: 10
Clicked: 6071
Filament geometrical model and nozzle trajectory analysis in the fused deposition modeling process
| |||||||||||||
Yu-zhen JIN, Jia-fan ZHANG, Ying WANG, Zu-chao ZHU. Filament geometrical model and nozzle trajectory analysis in the fused deposition modeling process[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University Science A, 2009, 10(3): 370-376.
@article{title="Filament geometrical model and nozzle trajectory analysis in the fused deposition modeling process",
author="Yu-zhen JIN, Jia-fan ZHANG, Ying WANG, Zu-chao ZHU",
journal="Journal of Zhejiang University Science A",
volume="10",
number="3",
pages="370-376",
year="2009",
publisher="Zhejiang University Press & Springer",
doi="10.1631/jzus.A0820346"
}
%0 Journal Article
%T Filament geometrical model and nozzle trajectory analysis in the fused deposition modeling process
%A Yu-zhen JIN
%A Jia-fan ZHANG
%A Ying WANG
%A Zu-chao ZHU
%J Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE A
%V 10
%N 3
%P 370-376
%@ 1673-565X
%D 2009
%I Zhejiang University Press & Springer
%DOI 10.1631/jzus.A0820346
TY - JOUR
T1 - Filament geometrical model and nozzle trajectory analysis in the fused deposition modeling process
A1 - Yu-zhen JIN
A1 - Jia-fan ZHANG
A1 - Ying WANG
A1 - Zu-chao ZHU
J0 - Journal of Zhejiang University Science A
VL - 10
IS - 3
SP - 370
EP - 376
%@ 1673-565X
Y1 - 2009
PB - Zhejiang University Press & Springer
ER -
DOI - 10.1631/jzus.A0820346
Abstract: The geometrical model of the filament during the fused deposition modeling (FDM) process was firstly proposed based on three different models, tractrix, parabola, and catenary. Comparing with the actual measured filament curves on the Stratasys 1600 FDM machine, it is indicated that the tractrix model had the best agreement with the actual measured curves. With the analytical simulation, the nozzle trajectories in the straight-line deposition road, circle road, and arbitrary continuous curve road were deduced, according to the traxtric based geometrical model of the filament.
[1] Bellini, A., Güceri, S., Bertoldi, M., 2004. Liquefier dynamics in fused deposition. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, 126(2):237-246.
[2] Cheng, W., Fuh, Y.H., Nee, A.Y.C., Wong, Y.S., Loh, H.T., Miyazawa, T., 1995. Multi-objective optimization of part-building orientation in stereolithograph. Rapid Prototyping Journal, 1(4):12-23.
[3] Chua, C.K., Leong, K.F., Lim, C.S., 2003. Rapid Prototyping—Principles and Applications (2nd Ed.). World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., Singapore.
[4] Han, W., Jafari, M.A., Danforth, S.C., Safari, A., 2002. Tool path-based deposition planning in fused deposition processes. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, 124(2):462-472.
[5] Han, W., Jafari, M.A., Seyed, K., 2003. Process speeding up via deposition planning in fused deposition-based layered manufacturing processes. Rapid Prototyping Journal, 9(4):212-218.
[6] Tata, k., Fadel, G., Baghi, A., Aziz, N., 1998. Efficient slicing for layered manufacturing. Rapid Prototyping Journal, 4(4):151-167.
[7] Tyberg, J., Bohn, J.H., 1998. Local adaptive slicing. Rapid Prototyping Journal, 4(3):118-127.
[8] Yan, X., Gu, P., 1996. A review of rapid prototyping technologies and systems. Computer-Aided Design, 28(4):307-318.
[9] Yardimci, M.A., 1999. Process Analysis and Development for Fused Deposition. PhD Thesis, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago.
[10] Yardimci, M.A., Hattori, T., Güceri, S., 1996. Conceptual framework for the thermal process modeling of fused deposition. Rapid Prototyping Journal, 2(2):26-31.
[11] Yardimci, M.A., Hattori, T., Güceri, S., Danforth, S.C., 1997. Thermal Analysis of Fused Deposition. Proceedings of the Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium, Austin, p.689-698.
Open peer comments: Debate/Discuss/Question/Opinion
<1>