Full Text:   <205>

Summary:  <93>

CLC number: X701.7

On-line Access: 2019-11-08

Received: 2019-06-02

Revision Accepted: 2019-09-29

Crosschecked: 2019-10-10

Cited: 0

Clicked: 317

Citations:  Bibtex RefMan EndNote GB/T7714


Shuang-jun Li


Shuai Deng


-   Go to

Article info.
Open peer comments

Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE A 2019 Vol.20 No.11 P.882-892


Comparative analysis of thermodynamic theoretical models for energy consumption of CO2 capture

Author(s):  Shuang-jun Li, Shuai Deng, Li Zhao, Wei-cong Xu, Xiang-zhou Yuan, Yang-zhou Zhou, Ya-wen Liang

Affiliation(s):  Key Laboratory of Efficient Utilization of Low and Medium Grade Energy (Tianjin University), Ministry of Education, Tianjin 300350, China; more

Corresponding email(s):   sdeng@tju.edu.cn, jons@tju.edu.cn

Key Words:  CO2 capture, Energy consumption, Theoretical model, Carbon pump

Share this article to: More <<< Previous Article|

Shuang-jun Li, Shuai Deng, Li Zhao, Wei-cong Xu, Xiang-zhou Yuan, Yang-zhou Zhou, Ya-wen Liang. Comparative analysis of thermodynamic theoretical models for energy consumption of CO2 capture[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University Science A, 2019, 20(11): 882-892.

@article{title="Comparative analysis of thermodynamic theoretical models for energy consumption of CO2 capture",
author="Shuang-jun Li, Shuai Deng, Li Zhao, Wei-cong Xu, Xiang-zhou Yuan, Yang-zhou Zhou, Ya-wen Liang",
journal="Journal of Zhejiang University Science A",
publisher="Zhejiang University Press & Springer",

%0 Journal Article
%T Comparative analysis of thermodynamic theoretical models for energy consumption of CO2 capture
%A Shuang-jun Li
%A Shuai Deng
%A Li Zhao
%A Wei-cong Xu
%A Xiang-zhou Yuan
%A Yang-zhou Zhou
%A Ya-wen Liang
%J Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE A
%V 20
%N 11
%P 882-892
%@ 1673-565X
%D 2019
%I Zhejiang University Press & Springer
%DOI 10.1631/jzus.A1900226

T1 - Comparative analysis of thermodynamic theoretical models for energy consumption of CO2 capture
A1 - Shuang-jun Li
A1 - Shuai Deng
A1 - Li Zhao
A1 - Wei-cong Xu
A1 - Xiang-zhou Yuan
A1 - Yang-zhou Zhou
A1 - Ya-wen Liang
J0 - Journal of Zhejiang University Science A
VL - 20
IS - 11
SP - 882
EP - 892
%@ 1673-565X
Y1 - 2019
PB - Zhejiang University Press & Springer
ER -
DOI - 10.1631/jzus.A1900226

CO2 capture is considered an effective technology to control the CO2 level in the atmosphere, but its development has been restricted due to its high energy requirement during CO2 concentration. Theoretical thermodynamic models have been used not only to predict energy consumption, but also to elucidate the energy conversion mechanism. However, the existing theoretical models have been applied without a clear consideration of boundaries, conditions, and limitations in thermodynamic images. Consequently, the results from such theoretical models can lead to a misunderstanding of the energy conversion mechanism during CO2 capture. A comparative analysis of three theoretical thermodynamic models, namely the mixture gas separation (MGS), carbon pump (CP), and thermodynamic carbon pump (TCP) models, was presented in this paper. The characteristics of these models for determining the energy consumption of CO2 capture were clarified and compared in relation to their practical application. The idealization levels of these models were demonstrated through comparison of theoretical estimates of the energy required for CO2 concentration. The correctness and convenience of the CP model were proved through a comparison between the CP and MGS models. The TCP model proposed in this study was proved to approach the ideal status more closely than the CP model. Finally, an application of the TCP model was presented through a case study on direct capture of CO2 from the air (DAC).

This paper aims to investigate and compare the performance by using three thermodynamic theoretical models. Then a case study of direct capture of CO2 from air (DAC) is presented as a case study. The comparative study is quite a general screen and provides more insights to this area. It is generally well written and organised.


创新点:1. 提出热力学碳泵模型,分析碳捕集技术理想能耗; 2. 对比不同碳捕集能耗分析模型,通过案例分析说明其不同特点和理想化程度的差异.
方法:1. 通过概念比拟,类比热泵概念,提出热力学碳泵概念,并阐述碳捕集过程是通过热或功驱动的二氧化碳从低浓度向高浓度逆向富集的非自发过程(图2和3),实现碳捕集技术实质的理想化概括; 2. 通过热力学理论推导,获得基于热力学碳泵模型的碳捕集最小理想能耗(公式(13)); 3. 通过案例分析,论证热力学碳泵模型相对混合气体分离模型和碳泵模型的理想化程度是否更高(图9),以及其中碳源、汇的无限质容假设是否更接近理想状态.
结论:1. 通过碳泵模型可以得到碳捕集技术的理想能耗,并且碳泵模型相对混合气体分离模型在使用时更便捷. 2. 热力学碳泵模型相对碳泵模型的理想化程度更高;因为忽略碳源、汇由传质引起的不可逆性,热力学碳泵模型计算所得最小理想能耗比碳泵模型计算所得理想能耗更小. 3. 通过热力学碳泵模型分析直接空气碳捕集技术表明,其最小理想能耗是相同反应条件下烟气处理技术的4.916倍.


Darkslateblue:Affiliate; Royal Blue:Author; Turquoise:Article


[1]Ben-Mansour R, Habib MA, Bamidele OE, et al., 2016. Carbon capture by physical adsorption: materials, experimental investigations and numerical modeling and simulation–a review. Applied Energy, 161:225-255.

[2]GCCSI (Global CCS Institute), 2018. The Global Status of CCS: 2018. https://www.globalccsinstitute.com/resources/global-status-report/

[3]Haynes WM, 2011. CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 91st Edition. CRC Press, Boca Raton, USA.

[4]House KZ, Harvey CF, Aziz MJ, et al., 2009. The energy penalty of post-combustion CO2 capture & storage and its implications for retrofitting the U.S. installed base. Energy & Environmental Science, 2(2):193-205.

[5]IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change), 2018. Global Warming of 1.5 ºC. Special report, IPCC. https://www.ipcc.ch/sr15/

[6]Jassim MS, Rochelle GT, 2006. Innovative absorber/stripper configurations for CO2 capture by aqueous monoethanolamine. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 45(8):2465-2472.

[7]Jiang L, Roskilly AP, Wang RZ, 2018. Performance exploration of temperature swing adsorption technology for carbon dioxide capture. Energy Conversion and Management, 165:396-404.

[8]Lackner KS, 2013. The thermodynamics of direct air capture of carbon dioxide. Energy, 50:38-46.

[9]Li SJ, Deng S, Zhao L, et al., 2018. Mathematical modeling and numerical investigation of carbon capture by adsorption: literature review and case study. Applied Energy, 221:437-449.

[10]Lively RP, Realff MJ, 2016. On thermodynamic separation efficiency: adsorption processes. AIChE Journal, 62(10):3699-3705.

[11]Odeh NA, Cockerill TT, 2008. Life cycle GHG assessment of fossil fuel power plants with carbon capture and storage. Energy Policy, 36(1):367-380.

[12]Turns SR, 2006. Thermodynamics: Concepts and Applications. Cambridge University Press, New York, USA.

[13]Wilcox J, 2012. Carbon Capture. Springer, New York, USA, p.21-25.

[14]Zhao B, Liu FZ, Cui Z, et al., 2017. Enhancing the energetic efficiency of MDEA/PZ-based CO2 capture technology for a 650 MW power plant: process improvement. Applied Energy, 185:362-375.

[15]Zhao RK, Deng S, Liu YN, et al., 2017a. Carbon pump: fundamental theory and applications. Energy, 119:1131-1143.

[16]Zhao RK, Zhao L, Deng S, et al., 2017b. A comparative study on CO2 capture performance of vacuum-pressure swing adsorption and pressure-temperature swing adsorption based on carbon pump cycle. Energy, 137:495-509.

[17]Zhao RK, Deng S, Zhao L, et al., 2017c. Experimental study and energy-efficiency evaluation of a 4-step pressure-vacuum swing adsorption (PVSA) for CO2 capture. Energy Conversion and Management, 151:179-189.

[18]Zhao RK, Deng S, Zhao L, et al., 2017d. Performance analysis of temperature swing adsorption for CO2 capture using thermodynamic properties of adsorbed phase. Applied Thermal Engineering, 123:205-215.

Open peer comments: Debate/Discuss/Question/Opinion


Please provide your name, email address and a comment

Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE, 38 Zheda Road, Hangzhou 310027, China
Tel: +86-571-87952783; E-mail: cjzhang@zju.edu.cn
Copyright © 2000 - Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE