Full Text:   <2495>

CLC number: R68

On-line Access: 2024-08-27

Received: 2023-10-17

Revision Accepted: 2024-05-08

Crosschecked: 2011-05-26

Cited: 6

Clicked: 5459

Citations:  Bibtex RefMan EndNote GB/T7714

-   Go to

Article info.
1. Reference List
Open peer comments

Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE B 2011 Vol.12 No.8 P.683-686

http://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.B1100097


Correlation between expectations of recovery and injury severity perception in whiplash-associated disorders


Author(s):  Robert Ferrari, Deon Louw

Affiliation(s):  Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2P4, Canada

Corresponding email(s):   rferrari@shaw.ca

Key Words:  Whiplash-associated disorders (WAD), Expectations of recovery, Injury severity perception (ISP)


Share this article to: More <<< Previous Article|

Robert Ferrari, Deon Louw. Correlation between expectations of recovery and injury severity perception in whiplash-associated disorders[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University Science B, 2011, 12(8): 683-686.

@article{title="Correlation between expectations of recovery and injury severity perception in whiplash-associated disorders",
author="Robert Ferrari, Deon Louw",
journal="Journal of Zhejiang University Science B",
volume="12",
number="8",
pages="683-686",
year="2011",
publisher="Zhejiang University Press & Springer",
doi="10.1631/jzus.B1100097"
}

%0 Journal Article
%T Correlation between expectations of recovery and injury severity perception in whiplash-associated disorders
%A Robert Ferrari
%A Deon Louw
%J Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE B
%V 12
%N 8
%P 683-686
%@ 1673-1581
%D 2011
%I Zhejiang University Press & Springer
%DOI 10.1631/jzus.B1100097

TY - JOUR
T1 - Correlation between expectations of recovery and injury severity perception in whiplash-associated disorders
A1 - Robert Ferrari
A1 - Deon Louw
J0 - Journal of Zhejiang University Science B
VL - 12
IS - 8
SP - 683
EP - 686
%@ 1673-1581
Y1 - 2011
PB - Zhejiang University Press & Springer
ER -
DOI - 10.1631/jzus.B1100097


Abstract: 
Objective: To assess the correlation between expectations of recovery and whiplash patients’ perceptions of injury severity using a simplified instrument. expectations of recovery have been shown to predict rate of recovery from whiplash injury in population-based studies. The perception of having more severe pathology or more ominous diagnostic labels has also been associated with a worse prognosis. Methods: Consecutive patients with whiplash-associated disorder grade 1 or 2, presenting in the acute stage to a primary care centre, were asked “do you think that your injury will…” with response options “get better soon; get better slowly; never get better; don’t know.” injury severity perception (ISP) was measured with a numerical rating scale which ranged from 0–10, on which subjects were asked to rate how severe (in terms of damage) they thought their injury was. The anchors were labeled “no damage” (0) and “severe, and maybe permanent damage” (10). The primary outcome measure was the correlation between the subject’s ISP score and expectation of recovery. Results: A total of 94 subjects (34 males, 60 females, and mean age (40.6±10.0) years, range 19–60 years) were included. The initial responses to expectation of recovery were: get better soon (29/94); get better slowly (22/94); never get better (11/94); don’t know (32/94). The mean ISP score was 4.9±1.7 (range 2–9 out of 10). There was a high correlation between expectations and ISP scores (Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient 0.68). Those who expected to recover soon and those who expected to get better slowly had the lowest ISP scores. Conclusions: The more slowly whiplash patients expect to recover, or the less sure they are of recovery, the more severe their initial perceptions of injury.

Darkslateblue:Affiliate; Royal Blue:Author; Turquoise:Article

Reference

[1]Bostick, G.P., Ferrari, R., Carroll, L.J., Russell, A.S., Buchbinder, R., Krawciw, D., Gross, D.P., 2009. A population-based survey of beliefs about neck pain from whiplash injury, work-related neck pain, and work-related upper extremity pain. Eur. J. Pain, 13(3):300-304.

[2]Buitenhuis, J., de Jong, P.J., Jaspers, J.P.C., Groothoff, J.W., 2008. Catastrophizing and causal beliefs in whiplash. Spine, 33(22):2427-2433.

[3]Carroll, L.J., Holm, L.W., Hogg-Johnson, S., Côtè, P., Cassidy, J.D., Haldeman, S., Nordin, M., Hurwitz, E.L., Carragee, E.J., van der Velde, G., et al., 2009a. Course and prognostic factors for neck pain in whiplash-associated disorders (WAD): results of the bone and joint decade 2000–2010 task force on neck pain and its associated disorders. J. Manip. Physiol. Ther., 32(2):S97-S107.

[4]Carroll, L.J., Holm, L.W., Ferrari, R., Ozegovic, D., Cassidy, J.D., 2009b. Recovery in whiplash-associated disorders: Do you get what you expect? J. Rheumatol., 36(5):1063-1070.

[5]Ferrari, R., 2002. The chronic whiplash syndrome: a case of attributional pathosis? Cephalalgia, 22(7):560-562.

[6]Ferrari, R., Russell, A.S., 2008.Whiplash: social interventions and solutions. J. Rheumatol., 35(12):2300-2302.

[7]Holm, L.W., Carroll, L.J., Cassidy, J.D., Skillgate, E., Ahlbom, A., 2008. Expectations for recovery important in the prognosis of whiplash injuries. PLos. Med., 5(5):760-767.

[8]Ozegovic, D., Carroll, L.J., Cassidy, J.D., 2009. Does expecting mean achieving? The association between expecting to return to work and recovery in whiplash associated disorders: a population-based prospective cohort study. Eur. Spine J., 18(6):893-899.

Open peer comments: Debate/Discuss/Question/Opinion

<1>

Please provide your name, email address and a comment





Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE, 38 Zheda Road, Hangzhou 310027, China
Tel: +86-571-87952783; E-mail: cjzhang@zju.edu.cn
Copyright © 2000 - 2024 Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE