CLC number: TP391.3
On-line Access: 2018-12-14
Received: 2016-08-15
Revision Accepted: 2017-07-12
Crosschecked: 2018-11-12
Cited: 0
Clicked: 5563
Wei Song, Ying Liu, Li-zhen Liu, Han-shi Wang. Semantic composition of distributed representations for query subtopic mining[J]. Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering,in press.https://doi.org/10.1631/FITEE.1601476 @article{title="Semantic composition of distributed representations for query subtopic mining", %0 Journal Article TY - JOUR
基于分布式表示语义组合的查询子主题挖掘关键词组: Darkslateblue:Affiliate; Royal Blue:Author; Turquoise:Article
Reference[1]Anagnostopoulos I, Razis G, Mylonas P, et al., 2015. Semantic query suggestion using Twitter entities. Neurocomputing, 163:137-150. [2]Baeza-Yates R, Hurtado C, Mendoza M, 2005. Query recommendation using query logs in search engines. LNCS, 3268:588-596. [3]Baroni M, Dinu G, Kruszewski G, 2014. Don’t count, predict! A systematic comparison of context-counting vs. context- predicting semantic vectors. Proc 52nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, p.238-247. [4]Beeferman D, Berger A, 2000. Agglomerative clustering of a search engine query log. Proc 6th ACM SIGKDD Int Conf on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, p.407-416. [5]Bengio Y, Ducharme R, Vincent P, et al., 2003. A neural probabilistic language model. J Mach Learn Res, 3: 1137-1155. [6]Clarke CLA, Craswell N, Soboroff I, 2009. Overview of the TREC 2009 web track. 18th Text Retrieval Conf, p.1-9. [7]Collobert R, Weston J, 2008. A unified architecture for natural language processing: deep neural networks with multitask learning. Proc 25th Int Conf on Machine Learning, p.160-167. [8]Damien A, Zhang M, Liu Y, et al., 2013. Improve web search diversification with intent subtopic mining. CCIS, 400: 322-333. [9]Dang V, Xue X, Croft WB, 2011. Inferring query aspects from reformulations using clustering. Proc 20th ACM Int Conf on Information and Knowledge Management, p.2117- 2120. [10]Grefenstette E, Dinu G, Zhang YZ, et al., 2013. Multi-step regression learning for compositional distributional semantics. https://arxiv.org/abs/1301.6939 [11]Hu J, Wang G, Lochovsky F, et al., 2009. Understanding user’s query intent with Wikipedia. Proc 18th Int Conf on World Wide Web, p.471-480. [12]Hu Y, Qian Y, Li H, et al., 2012. Mining query subtopics from search log data. Proc 35th Int ACM SIGIR Conf on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, p.305-314. [13]Jiang X, Han X, Sun L, 2011. ISCAS at subtopic mining task in NTCIR9. Proc NTCIR-9 Workshop Meeting, p.168-171. [14]Joho H, Kishida K, 2014. Overview of NTCIR-11. Proc 11th NTCIR Conf, p.1-7. [15]Jones R, Klinkner KL, 2008. Beyond the session timeout: automatic hierarchical segmentation of search topics in query logs. Proc 17th ACM Conf on Information and Knowledge Management, p.699-708. [16]Karunasekera S, Harwood A, Samarawickrama S, et al., 2014. Topic-specific post identification in microblog streams. IEEE Int Conf on Big Data, p.7-13. [17]Kim SJ, Lee JH, 2013. Subtopic mining based on head- modifier relation and co-occurrence of intents using web documents. LNCS, 8138:179-191. [18]Le Q, Mikolov T, 2014. Distributed representations of sentences and documents. Proc 31st Int Conf on Machine Learning, p.1188-1196. [19]Li X, Wang YY, Acero A, 2008. Learning query intent from regularized click graphs. Proc 31st Annual Int ACM SIGIR Conf on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, p.339-346. [20]Liu Y, Song R, Zhang M, et al., 2014. Overview of the NTCIR-11 IMine task. Proc 11th NTCIR Conf, p.8-23. [21]Luo C, Liu Y, Zhang M, et al., 2014. Query recommendation based on user intent recognition. J Chin Inform Process, 28(1):64-72 (in Chinese). [22]Mikolov T, Chen K, Corrado G, et al., 2013a. Efficient estimation of word representations in vector space. https://arxiv.org/abs/1301.3781 [23]Mikolov T, Yih WT, Zweig G, 2013b. Linguistic regularities in continuous space word representations. Proc NAACL- HLT, p.746-751. [24]Mitchell J, Lapata M, 2010. Composition in distributional models of semantics. Cogn Sci, 34(8):1388-1429. [25]Mnih A, Hinton G, 2007. Three new graphical models for statistical language modelling. Proc 24th Int Conf on Machine Learning, p.641-648. [26]Radlinski F, Szummer M, Craswell N, 2010. Inferring query intent from reformulations and clicks. Proc 19th Int Conf on World Wide Web, p.1171-1172. [27]Rafiei D, Bharat K, Shukla A, 2010. Diversifying web search results. Proc 19th Int Conf on World Wide Web, p.781-790. [28]Sakai T, Song R, 2011. Evaluating diversified search results using per-intent graded relevance. Proc 34th Int ACM SIGIR Conf on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, p.1043-1052. [29]Sakai T, Dou Z, Yamamoto T, et al., 2013. Overview of the NTCIR-10 INTENT-2 task. Proc 10th NTCIR Conf, p.94-123. [30]Santos RLT, Macdonald C, Ounis I, 2010. Exploiting query reformulations for web search result diversification. Proc 19th Int Conf on World Wide Web, p.881-890. [31]Socher R, Lin CC, Ng AY, et al., 2011a. Parsing natural scenes and natural language with recursive neural networks. Proc 28th Int Conf on Machine Learning, p.129-136. [32]Socher R, Pennington J, Huang EH, et al., 2011b. Semi- supervised recursive autoencoders for predicting sentiment distributions. Proc Conf on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Association for Computational Linguistics, p.151-161. [33]Song R, Luo Z, Nie JY, et al., 2009. Identification of ambiguous queries in web search. Inform Process Manag, 45(2): 216-229. [34]Song R, Zhang M, Sakai T, et al., 2011. Overview of the NTCIR-9 INTENT task. Proc NTCIR-9 Workshop Meeting, p.82-105. [35]Song W, Yu Q, Xu ZH, et al., 2012. Multi-aspect query summarization by composite query. Proc 35th Int ACM SIGIR Conf on Research and development in Information Retrieval, p.325-334. [36]Song W, Liu Y, Liu L, et al., 2016. Examining personalization heuristics by topical analysis of query log. Int J Innov Comput Inform Contr, 12(5):1745-1760. [37]Strohmaier M, Kröll M, Körner C, 2009. Intentional query suggestion: making user goals more explicit during search. Proc Workshop on Web Search Click Data, p.68-74. [38]Wang CJ, Lin YW, Tsai MF, et al., 2013. Mining subtopics from different aspects for diversifying search results. Inform Retriev, 16(4):452-483. [39]Xu J, Croft WB, 1996. Query expansion using local and global document analysis. Proc 19th Annual Int ACM SIGIR Conf on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, p.4-11. [40]Yu M, Dredze M, 2015. Learning composition models for phrase embeddings. Trans Assoc Comput Ling, 3:227-242. [41]Zanzotto FM, Korkontzelos I, Fallucchi F, et al., 2010. Estimating linear models for compositional distributional semantics. Proc 23rd Int Conf on Computational Linguistics, p.1263-1271. [42]Zeng HJ, He QC, Chen Z, et al., 2004. Learning to cluster web search results. Proc 27th Annual Int ACM SIGIR Conf on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, p.210-217. [43]Zhao Y, Liu Z, Sun M, 2015. Phrase type sensitive tensor indexing model for semantic composition. Proc 29th AAAI Conf on Artificial Intelligence, p.2195-2201. [44]Zheng W, Fang H, 2011. A comparative study of search result diversification methods. 1st Int Workshop on Diversity in Document Retrieval, p.55-62. [45]Zheng W, Fang H, Yao C, et al., 2014. Leveraging integrated information to extract query subtopics for search result diversification. Inform Retriev, 17(1):52-73. Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE, 38 Zheda Road, Hangzhou
310027, China
Tel: +86-571-87952783; E-mail: cjzhang@zju.edu.cn Copyright © 2000 - 2024 Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE |
Open peer comments: Debate/Discuss/Question/Opinion
<1>