Full Text:  <2407>

Summary:  <1664>

CLC number: TM464

On-line Access: 2018-12-14

Received: 2016-12-29

Revision Accepted: 2017-04-25

Crosschecked: 2018-11-26

Cited: 0

Clicked: 6307

Citations:  Bibtex RefMan EndNote GB/T7714

 ORCID:

Heng Nian

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4816-084X

-   Go to

Article info.
Open peer comments

Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering 

Accepted manuscript available online (unedited version)


Improved three-vector based dead-beat model predictive direct power control strategy for grid-connected inverters


Author(s):  Chen-wen Cheng, Heng Nian, Long-qi Li

Affiliation(s):  College of Electrical Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China

Corresponding email(s):  nianheng@zju.edu.cn

Key Words:  Grid-connected inverter, Model predictive control, Direct power control, Three vectors, Constant switching frequency, Power errors


Share this article to: More <<< Previous Paper|Next Paper >>>

Chen-wen Cheng, Heng Nian, Long-qi Li. Improved three-vector based dead-beat model predictive direct power control strategy for grid-connected inverters[J]. Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering,in press.https://doi.org/10.1631/FITEE.1601874

@article{title="Improved three-vector based dead-beat model predictive direct power control strategy for grid-connected inverters",
author="Chen-wen Cheng, Heng Nian, Long-qi Li",
journal="Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering",
year="in press",
publisher="Zhejiang University Press & Springer",
doi="https://doi.org/10.1631/FITEE.1601874"
}

%0 Journal Article
%T Improved three-vector based dead-beat model predictive direct power control strategy for grid-connected inverters
%A Chen-wen Cheng
%A Heng Nian
%A Long-qi Li
%J Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering
%P 1420-1431
%@ 2095-9184
%D in press
%I Zhejiang University Press & Springer
doi="https://doi.org/10.1631/FITEE.1601874"

TY - JOUR
T1 - Improved three-vector based dead-beat model predictive direct power control strategy for grid-connected inverters
A1 - Chen-wen Cheng
A1 - Heng Nian
A1 - Long-qi Li
J0 - Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering
SP - 1420
EP - 1431
%@ 2095-9184
Y1 - in press
PB - Zhejiang University Press & Springer
ER -
doi="https://doi.org/10.1631/FITEE.1601874"


Abstract: 
Since only one inverter voltage vector is applied during each duty cycle, traditional model predictive direct power control (MPDPC) for grid-connected inverters (GCIs) results in serious harmonics in current and power. Moreover, a high sampling frequency is needed to ensure satisfactory steady-state performance, which is contradictory to its long execution time due to the iterative prediction calculations. To solve these problems, a novel dead-beat MPDPC strategy is proposed, using two active inverter voltage vectors and one zero inverter voltage vector during each duty cycle. Adoption of three inverter vectors ensures a constant switching frequency. Thus, smooth steady-state performance of both current and power can be obtained. Unlike the traditional three-vector based MPDPC strategy, the proposed three vectors are selected based on the power errors rather than the sector where the grid voltage vector is located, which ensures that the duration times of the selected vectors are positive all the time. Iterative calculations of the cost function in traditional predictive control are also removed, which makes the proposed strategy easy to implement on digital signal processors (DSPs) for industrial applications. Results of experiments based on a 1 kW inverter setup validate the feasibility of the proposed three-vector based dead-beat MPDPC strategy.

用于并网逆变器的改进三矢量无差拍模型预测直接功率控制策略

摘要:用于并网逆变器的传统模型预测直接功率控制,在每个控制周期只使用一个逆变器电压矢量,导致并网电流和功率出现大量谐波分量,降低电能质量。为提高稳态性能,预测控制需要很高的采样频率,同时由于计算复杂,预测算法需要较长执行时间,二者存在矛盾。为解决这个问题,提出一种新的无差拍模型预测直接功率控制策略,在每个控制周期使用2个有效电压矢量和1个零电压矢量。采用三矢量策略保证开关频率恒定,提高电流和功率质量。不同于传统三矢量模型预测直接功率控制策略,该方法根据功率误差而非电网电压矢量位置选择三个矢量,保证矢量计算时间始终为正。同时,无需迭代计算,有利于在数字信号处理芯片上执行算法。最后,搭建1 kW逆变器实验平台,验证了该方法的有效性。

关键词组:并网逆变器;模型预测控制;直接功率控制;三矢量;恒定开关频率;功率误差

Darkslateblue:Affiliate; Royal Blue:Author; Turquoise:Article

Reference

[1]Aguilera RP, Quevedo DE, Vazquez S, et al., 2013. Generalized predictive direct power control for AC/DC converters. Proc IEEE ECCE Asia Downunder, p.1215-1220.

[2]Blasko V, Kaura V, 1997. A new mathematical model and control of a three-phase AC-DC voltage source converter. IEEE Trans Power Electron, 12(1):116-123. https:// doi.org/10.1109/63.554176

[3]Chen X, Zhang Y, Wang SS, et al., 2017. Impedance-phased dynamic control method for grid-connected inverters in a weak grid. IEEE Trans Power Electron, 32(1):274-283.

[4]Cheng CW, Nian H, Wang XH, et al., 2017. Dead-beat predictive direct power control of voltage source inverters with optimized switching patterns. IET Power Electron, 10(12):1438-1451.

[5]Choi DK, Lee KB, 2015. Dynamic performance improvement of AC/DC converter using model predictive direct power control with finite control set. IEEE Trans Ind Electron, 62(2):757-767.

[6]Cortes P, Rodriguez J, Quevedo DE, et al., 2008a. Predictive current control strategy with imposed load current spectrum. IEEE Trans Power Electron, 23(2):612-618.

[7]Cortes P, Rodriguez J, Antoniewicz P, et al., 2008b. Direct power control of an AFE using predictive control. IEEE Trans Power Electron, 23(5):2516-2523.

[8]Dekka A, Wu B, Yaramasu V, et al., 2017. Model predictive control with common-mode voltage injection for modular multilevel converter. IEEE Trans Power Electron, 32(3): 1767-1778.

[9]Fang H, Zhang ZB, Feng XY, et al., 2016. Ripple-reduced model predictive direct power control for active front-end power converters with extended switching vectors and time-optimised control. IET Power Electron, 9(9):1914- 1923.

[10]Golestan S, Guerrero JR, Vasquez JC, 2017. Three-phase PLLs: a review of recent advances. IEEE Trans Power Electron, 32(3):1894-1907.

[11]Hu JB, 2013. Improved dead-beat predictive DPC strategy of grid-connected dc-ac converters with switching loss minimization and delay compensations. IEEE Trans Ind Inform, 9(2):728-738.

[12]Hu JB, Zhu ZQ, 2013. Improved voltage-vector sequences on dead-beat predictive direct power control of reversible three-phase grid-connected voltage-source converters. IEEE Trans Power Electron, 28(1):254-267.

[13]Larrinaga SA, Vidal MAR, Oyarbide E, et al., 2007. Predictive control strategy for DC/AC converters based on direct power control. IEEE Trans Ind Electron, 54(3):1261- 1271.

[14]Malinowiski M, 2001. Sensorless control strategies for three- phase PWM rectifiers. PhD Thesis, Warsaw University of Technology, Warsaw, Poland.

[15]Rodriguez JR, Dixon JW, Espinoza JR, et al., 2005. PWM regenerative rectifiers: state of the art. IEEE Trans Ind Electron, 52(1):5-22.

[16]Song ZF, Chen W, Xia CL, 2014. Predictive direct power control for three-phase grid-connected converters without sector information and voltage vector selection. IEEE Trans Power Electron, 29(10):5518-5531.

[17]Vargas R, Cortes P, Ammann U, et al., 2007. Predictive control of a three-phase neutral-point-clamped inverter. IEEE Trans Ind Electron, 54(5):2697-2705.

[18]Vazquez S, Marquez A, Aguilera R, et al., 2015. Predictive optimal switching sequence direct power control for grid- connected power converters. IEEE Trans Ind Electron, 62(4):2010-2020.

[19]Zeng Z, Li H, Tang SQ, et al., 2016. Multi-objective control of multi-functional grid-connected inverter for renewable energy integration and power quality service. IET Power Electron, 9(4):761-770.

[20]Zhang YC, Zhu JG, 2011. A novel duty cycle control strategy to reduce both torque and flux ripples for DTC of permanent magnet synchronous motor drives with switching frequency reduction. IEEE Trans Power Electron, 26(10): 3055-3067.

[21]Zhang YC, Xie W, Li ZX, et al., 2013. Model predictive direct power control of a PWM rectifier with duty cycle optimization. IEEE Trans Power Electron, 28(11):5343-5351.

[22]Zhang YC, Xie W, Li ZX, et al., 2014. Low-complexity model predictive power control: double-vector-based approach. IEEE Trans Ind Electron, 61(11):5871-5880.

[23]Zhang YC, Peng YB, Yang HT, 2016. Performance improvement of two-vector-based model predictive control of PWM rectifier. IEEE Trans Power Electron, 31(8): 6016-6030.

[24]Zhao QS, Ye YQ, Xu GF, et al., 2016. Improved repetitive control scheme for grid-connected inverter with frequency adaptation. IET Power Electron, 9(5):883-890.

Open peer comments: Debate/Discuss/Question/Opinion

<1>

Please provide your name, email address and a comment





Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE, 38 Zheda Road, Hangzhou 310027, China
Tel: +86-571-87952783; E-mail: cjzhang@zju.edu.cn
Copyright © 2000 - 2024 Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE