JZUS - Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE

Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE A 2006 Vol.7 No.5 P.830-836

http://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.2006.A0830

Interactive transport of multi-view videos for 3DTV applications

Author(s): Kurutepe Engin, Civanlar M. Reha, Tekalp A. Murat
Affiliation(s): School of Engineering, Koç more
Corresponding email(s): ekurutepe@ku.edu.tr, rcivanlar@ku.edu.tr, mtekalp@ku.edu.tr
Key Words: 3DTV, Multi-view video, Application-layer multicast, Join-latency

Share this article to： More <<< Previous Article \|Next Article >>>

Abstract: The authors propose a novel method for transporting multi-view videos that aims to keep the bandwidth requirements on both end-users and servers as low as possible. The method is based on application layer multicast, where each end point receives only a selected number of views required for rendering video from its current viewpoint at any given time. The set of selected videos changes in real time as the user’s viewpoint changes because of head or eye movements. Techniques for reducing the black-outs during fast viewpoint changes were investigated. The performance of the approach was studied through network experiments.

Reference

[1] Adelson, E.H., Bergen, J.R., 1991. The Plenoptic Function and the Elements of Early Vision. In: Landy, M., Movshon, J.A. (Eds.), Computational Models of Visual Processing. MIT Press, Cambridge.

[2] Banerjee, S., Bhattacharjee, B., Kommareddy, C., 2002. Scalable Application Layer Multicast. Proc. ACM SIGCOMM.

[3] Chu, Y.H., Rao, S.G., Zhang, H., 2001. A Case for End System Multicast. Proceedings of ACM SIGCOMM.

[4] Estrin, D., Handley, M., Helmy, A., Huang, P., Thaler, D., 1999. A Dynamic Bootstrap Mechanism for Rendezvous-based Multicast Routing. Proc. IEEE INFOCOM, p.1090-1098.

[5] Fehn, C., Hopf, K., Quante, Q., 2004. Key Technologies for an Advanced 3D-TV System. Proceedings of SPIE Three-Dimensional TV, Video and Display III. Philadephia, PA, USA, p.66-80.

[6] Gortler, S.J., Grzeszczuk, R., Szeliski, R., Cohen, M.F., 1996. The Lumigraph. Proc. ACM Siggraph, p.43-54.

[7] Kang, S.B., Szeliski, R., Anadan, P., 2000. The Geometry-Image Representation Tradeoff for Rendering. Proceedings of 2000 International Conference on Image Processing, 2:13-16.

[8] Kiruluta, A., Eizenman, M., Pasupathy, S., 1997. Predictive head movement tracking using a kalman filter. IEEE Trans. on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 27(2):326-331.

[9] Kurutepe, E., Civanlar, M.R., Tekalp, A.M., 2005. A Receiver-Driven Multicasting Framework for 3DTV Transmission. European Signal Processing Conference.

[10] Levoy, M., Hanrahan, P., 1996. Light Field Rendering. Proc. ACM Siggraph, p.31-42.

[11] Magnor, M., Girod, B., 2000. Data compression for light field rendering. IEEE Trans. on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 10(3):338-343.

[12] McCanne, S., Jacobson, V., Vetterli, M., 1996. Receiver-driven Layered Multicast. ACM Sigcomm.

[13] Tong, X., Gray, R.M., 2003. Interactive rendering from compressed light fields. IEEE Trans. on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 13(11):1080-1091.

[14] Zhang, C., Chen, T., 2004. A survey on image based rendering—representation, sampling, and compression. Signal Processing: Image Communication, 19(1):1-28.

Open peer comments: Debate/Discuss/Question/Opinion

<1>

Similar articles

- Go to

Darkslateblue:Affiliate; Royal Blue:Author; Turquoise:Article

Reference