Similar articles

Abstract: Using the Global Positioning System (GPS) and the mobility of marine surface vehicles, this paper addresses the navigation problem between unmanned surface vehicles (USVs) and autonomous underwater vehicles (AUVs). We propose a moving AUV state estimation method based on the trajectory optimization of the USV. In particular, by exploring the Doppler effect on the frequency of arrival (FOA) of the acoustic signals received by a single-surface USV, the position and velocity of the AUV can be estimated simultaneously, offering a robust solution that eliminates the need for time synchronization. Moreover, the USV trajectory is dynamically adjusted to achieve optimal USV–AUV measurement geometry, thereby improving the AUV's observability and enhancing state estimation performance. The innovation lies in a tailored cost function grounded in observability analysis via the Cramér–Rao lower bound (CRLB) and geometric constraints. It integrates (1) the CRLB to optimize system observability, thereby enhancing estimation accuracy, (2) a distance term to ensure that the USV maintains appropriate proximity to the AUV, and (3) a turning rate term that adjusts the USV's orientation to improve following capability. The cost function is then minimized using a particle swarm optimization algorithm, balancing these components to achieve a robust AUV tracking framework. We conduct comprehensive simulations to examine the potential influences of different factors, including the complexity of the USV trajectory, AUV depth, measurement frequency, packet loss rate, and noise levels, on navigation performance. Simulation results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method in estimating and tracking the AUV.

基于到达频率的自主海洋航行器状态估计与轨迹优化导航方法

[1]Becker C, Ribas D, Ridao P, 2012. Simultaneous sonar beacon localization & AUV navigation. IFAC Proc Vol, 45(27):200-205.

[2]Cameron KJ, 2018. FDOA-Based Passive Source Localization: a Geometric Perspective. PhD Dissertation, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, USA.

[3]Chen HF, Xie L, Shen CQ, 2015. Optimal Byzantine attack strategy for distributed localisation with M-ary quantised data. Electron Lett, 51(25):2158-2160.

[4]Conti A, Mazuelas S, Bartoletti S, et al., 2019. Soft information for Localization-of-Things. Proc IEEE, 107(11):2240-2264.

[5]de Palma D, Arrichiello F, Parlangeli G, et al., 2017. Underwater localization using single beacon measurements: observability analysis for a double integrator system. Ocean Eng, 142:650-665.

[6]Fallon MF, Papadopoulos G, Leonard JJ, et al., 2010. Cooperative AUV navigation using a single maneuvering surface craft. Int J Robot Res, 29(12):1461-1474.

[7]Fossen TI, 2011. Handbook of Marine Craft Hydrodynamics and Motion Control. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK.

[8]Gong ZJ, Li C, Su RY, 2023. Fundamental limits of Doppler shift-based, ToA-based, and TDoA-based underwater localization. IEEE/CAA J Autom Sin, 10(7):1637-1639.

[9]Guo HR, Qian ZW, Wang XJ, et al., 2023. A robust attitude estimation algorithm for seabed inverted ultra-short baseline. Ocean Eng, 280:114534.

[10]Han YF, Shi CH, Sun DJ, et al., 2018. Research on integrated navigation algorithm based on ranging information of single beacon. Appl Acoust, 131:203-209.

[11]Holthuijsen LH, 2010. Waves in Oceanic and Coastal Waters. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, USA.

[12]Jiang C, Li JL, Xu W, et al., 2021. Improvement of the position estimation for underwater gliders with a passive acoustic method. IEEE J Ocean Eng, 46(4):1165-1178.

[13]Kim J, 2023. Underwater transmitter localization based on TDOA and FDOA considering the unknown time-varying emission frequency. J Mar Sci Eng, 11(7):1260.

[14]Kinsler LE, Frey AR, Coppens AB, et al., 2000. Fundamentals of Acoustics (4^th Ed.). John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, USA.

[15]Lee PM, Jun BH, 2007. Pseudo long base line navigation algorithm for underwater vehicles with inertial sensors and two acoustic range measurements. Ocean Eng, 34(3-4):416-425.

[16]Moreno-Salinas D, Pascoal A, Aranda J, 2016. Optimal sensor placement for acoustic underwater target positioning with range-only measurements. IEEE J Ocean Eng, 41(3):620-643.

[17]Nguyen NH, Dogancay K, 2018. Closed-form algebraic solutions for 3-D Doppler-only source localization. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun, 17(10):6822-6836.

[18]Ostachowicz W, Soman R, Malinowski P, 2019. Optimization of sensor placement for structural health monitoring: a review. Struct Health Monit, 18(3):963-988.

[19]Qu JQ, Li XG, Sun GW, 2021. Optimal formation configuration analysis for cooperative localization system of multi-AUV. IEEE Access, 9:90702-90714.

[20]Ramezani H, Jamali-Rad H, Leus G, 2013. Target localization and tracking for an isogradient sound speed profile. IEEE Trans Signal Process, 61(6):1434-1446.

[21]Rypkema NR, 2019. Underwater & Out of Sight: Towards Ubiquity in Underwater Robotics. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, USA.

[22]Sahu N, Wu LL, Babu P, et al., 2022. Optimal sensor placement for source localization: a unified ADMM approach. IEEE Trans Veh Technol, 71(4):4359-4372.

[23]Stojanovic M, Preisig J, 2009. Underwater acoustic communication channels: propagation models and statistical characterization. IEEE Commun Mag, 47(1):84-89.

[24]Tan YT, Gao R, Chitre M, 2014. Cooperative path planning for range-only localization using a single moving beacon. IEEE J Ocean Eng, 39(2):371-385.

[25]Wang ST, Zheng HR, Zhang T, et al., 2025. Frequency and time of arrival based moving target state estimation with underwater distributed sensor network. Ocean Eng, 334:121563.

[26]Webster SE, Eustice RM, Singh H, et al., 2012. Advances in single-beacon one-way-travel-time acoustic navigation for underwater vehicles. Int J Robot Res, 31(8):935-950.

[27]Win MZ, Shen Y, Wymeersch H, 2008. On the position error bound in cooperative networks: a geometric approach. Proc 10^th Int Symp on Spread Spectrum Techniques and Applications, p.637-643.

[28]Xu B, Fei YL, Wang XY, et al., 2023. Optimal topology design of multi-target AUVs for 3D cooperative localization formation based on angle of arrival measurement. Ocean Eng, 271:113758.

[29]Yu Y, Zheng HR, Xu W, 2025. Learning and sampling-based informative path planning for AUVs in ocean current fields. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Syst, 55(1):51-62.

[30]Zhan DZ, Wang ST, Cai SG, et al., 2023. Acoustic localization with multi-layer isogradient sound speed profile using TDOA and FDOA. Front Inform Technol Electron Eng, 24(1):164-175.

[31]Zhang BB, Ji DX, Liu S, et al., 2023. Autonomous underwater vehicle navigation: a review. Ocean Eng, 273:113861.

[32]Zhang DQ, Ashraf MA, Liu ZL, et al., 2020. Dynamic modeling and adaptive controlling in GPS-intelligent buoy (GIB) systems based on neural-fuzzy networks. Ad Hoc Netw, 103:102149.

[33]Zheng HR, Liu CG, 2025. An overview of unmanned surface vehicles: methods, practices, and applications. Contr Eng Pract, 164:106479.

[34]Zheng HR, Li JC, Tian ZE, et al., 2024. Hybrid physics-learning model based predictive control for trajectory tracking of unmanned surface vehicles. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst, 25(9):11522-11533.

[35]Zhu ZB, Hu SLJ, 2018. Model and algorithm improvement on single beacon underwater tracking. IEEE J Ocean Eng, 43(4):1143-1160.