Similar articles

Abstract: Modal analysis, which provides modal parameters including frequencies, damping ratios, and mode shapes, is essential for assessing structural safety in structural health monitoring. automated operational modal analysis (AOMA) offers a promising alternative to traditional methods that depend heavily on human intervention and engineering judgment. However, estimating structural dynamic properties and managing spurious modes remain challenging due to uncertainties in practical application conditions. To address this issue, we propose an automated modal identification approach comprising three key aspects: (1) identification of modal parameters using covariance-driven stochastic subspace identification; (2) automated interpretation of the stabilization diagram; (3) an improved self-adaptive algorithm for grouping physical modes based on ordering points to identify the clustering structure (OPTICS) combined with k-nearest neighbors (KNN). The proposed approach can play a crucial role in enabling real-time structural health monitoring without human intervention. A simulated 10-story shear frame was used to verify the methodology. Identification results from a cable-stayed bridge demonstrate the practicality of the proposed method for conducting AOMA in engineering practice. The proposed approach can automatically identify modal parameters with high accuracy, making it suitable for a real-time structural health monitoring framework.

基于OPTICS-KNN聚类的两阶段自动模态参数识别方法

[1]Abu AlfeilatHA, HassanatABA, LasassmehO, et al., 2019. Effects of distance measure choice on K-nearest neighbor classifier performance: a review. Big Data, 7(4):221-248.

[2]BoroschekRL, BilbaoJA, 2019. Interpretation of stabilization diagrams using density-based clustering algorithm. Engineering Structures, 178:245-257.

[3]CabboiA, MagalhãesF, GentileC, et al., 2017. Automated modal identification and tracking: application to an iron arch bridge. Structural Control and Health Monitoring, 24(1):e1854.

[4]ChenJ, XuYL, ZhangRC, 2004. Modal parameter identification of Tsing Ma suspension bridge under Typhoon Victor: EMD-HT method. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 92(10):805-827.

[5]ChopraAK, 2017. Dynamics of Structures-Theory and Applications to Earthquake Engineering. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, USA.

[6]CiveraM, MugnainiV, FragonaraLZ, 2022. Machine learning-based automatic operational modal analysis: a structural health monitoring application to masonry arch bridges. Structural Control and Health Monitoring, 29:e3028.

[7]CiveraM, SibilleL, FragonaraLZ, et al., 2023. A DBSCAN-based automated operational modal analysis algorithm for bridge monitoring. Measurement, 208:112451.

[8]DesjardinsS, LauD, 2022. Advances in intelligent long-term vibration-based structural health-monitoring systems for bridges. Advances in Structural Engineering, 25(7):1413-1430.

[9]DöhlerM, MevelL, 2013. Efficient multi-order uncertainty computation for stochastic subspace identification. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 38(2):346-366.

[10]DoroudiR, Hosseini LavassaniSH, ShahrouziM, et al., 2022. Identifying the dynamic characteristics of super tall buildings by multivariate empirical mode decomposition. Structural Control and Health Monitoring, 29(3):e3075.

[11]EreizS, DuvnjakI, Jiménez-AlonsoJF, 2022. Review of finite element model updating methods for structural applications. Structures, 41:684-723.

[12]EwinsDJ, 2003. Modal Testing: Theory, Practice and Application. Research Students Press LTD., Baldock, UK.

[13]FanG, LiJ, HaoH, 2019. Improved automated operational modal identification of structures based on clustering. Structural Control and Health Monitoring, 26(12):1-23.

[14]FarrarCR, WordenK, 2007. An introduction to structural health monitoring. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 365(1851):303-315.

[15]FengYH, SuYH, ZhaoC, et al., 2024. A two-stage automated OMA framework for transmission towers based on clustering algorithms. Structures, 61:106023.

[16]García-PedrajasN, del CastilloJAR, Cerruela-GarcíaG, 2017. A proposal for local k values for k-nearest neighbor rule. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 28(2):470-475.

[17]Garcia-PerezA, Amezquita-SanchezJP, Dominguez-GonzalezA, et al., 2013. Fused empirical mode decomposition and wavelets for locating combined damage in a truss-type structure through vibration analysis. Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE A, 14(9):615-630.

[18]GreśS, DöhlerM, AndersenP, et al., 2021. Uncertainty quantification for the modal phase collinearity of complex mode shapes. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 152:107436.

[19]GuJF, GulM, WuXG, 2017. Damage detection under varying temperature using artificial neural networks. Structural Control and Health Monitoring, 24(11):e1998.

[20]HeM, LiangP, LiJ, et al., 2021. Fully automated precise operational modal identification. Engineering Structures, 234:111988.

[21]HeY, YangJP, LiYF, 2022. A three-stage automated modal identification framework for bridge parameters based on frequency uncertainty and density clustering. Engineering Structures, 255:113891.

[22]HouRR, XiaY, 2021. Review on the new development of vibration-based damage identification for civil engineering structures: 2010-2019. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 491:115741.

[23]HuangCS, LeQT, SuWC, et al., 2020. Wavelet-based approach of time series model for modal identification of a bridge with incomplete input. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 35(9):947-964.

[24]JeongS, FergusonM, HouR, et al., 2019. Sensor data reconstruction using bidirectional recurrent neural network with application to bridge monitoring. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 42:100991.

[25]JinSS, JeongS, SimSH, et al., 2021. Fully automated peak-picking method for an autonomous stay-cable monitoring system in cable-stayed bridges. Automation in Construction, 126:103628.

[26]KangF, LiJJ, 2020. Displacement model for concrete dam safety monitoring via Gaussian process regression considering extreme air temperature. Journal of Structural Engineering, 146(1):05019001.

[27]LiuDW, BaoYQ, LiH, 2023. Machine learning-based stochastic subspace identification method for structural modal parameters. Engineering Structures, 274:115178.

[28]LiuYC, LohCH, NiYQ, 2013. Stochastic subspace identification for output-only modal analysis: application to super high-rise tower under abnormal loading condition. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 42(4):477-498.

[29]LuoYZ, ChenY, WanHP, et al., 2021. Development of laser-based displacement monitoring system and its application to large-scale spatial structures. Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring, 11(2):381-395.

[30]LuoYZ, FuWW, WanHP, et al., 2022. Load-effect separation of a large-span prestressed structure based on an enhanced EEMD-ICA methodology. Journal of Structural Engineering, 148(3):04021288.

[31]MaoJX, WangH, FuYG, et al., 2019. Automated modal identification using principal component and cluster analysis: application to a long-span cable-stayed bridge. Structural Control and Health Monitoring, 26(10):e2430.

[32]McLachlanGJ, LeeSX, RathnayakeSI, 2019. Finite mixture models. Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application, 6:355-378.

[33]MostafaeiH, GhamamiM, AghabozorgiP, 2021. Modal identification of concrete arch dam by fully automated operational modal identification. Structures, 32:228-236.

[34]MugnainiV, FragonaraLZ, CiveraM, 2022. A machine learning approach for automatic operational modal analysis. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 170:108813.

[35]NeuE, JanserF, KhatibiAA, et al., 2017. Fully automated operational modal analysis using multi-stage clustering. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 84:308-323.

[36]NiYQ, WangYW, ZhangC, 2020. A Bayesian approach for condition assessment and damage alarm of bridge expansion joints using long-term structural health monitoring data. Engineering Structures, 212:110520.

[37]PanYX, VenturaCE, XiongHB, et al., 2020. Model updating and seismic response of a super tall building in Shanghai. Computers & Structures, 239:106285.

[38]PeetersB, de RoeckG, 1999. Reference-based stochastic subspace identification for output-only modal analysis. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 13(6):855-878.

[39]PeetersB, LowetG, van der AuweraerH, et al., 2004. A new procedure for modal parameter estimation. Sound and Vibration, 38(1):24-29.

[40]RainieriC, FabbrocinoG, 2014. Operational Modal Analysis of Civil Engineering Structures. Springer, New York, USA.

[41]RanL, DingY, ChenQZ, et al., 2023. Influence of adjacent shield tunneling construction on existing tunnel settlement: field monitoring and intelligent prediction. Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE A, 24(12):1106-1119.

[42]RenWX, ZongZH, 2004. Output-only modal parameter identification of civil engineering structures. Structural Engineering and Mechanics, 17(3-4):429-444.

[43]ReyndersE, de RoeckG, 2008. Reference-based combined deterministic–stochastic subspace identification for experimental and operational modal analysis. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 22(3):617-637.

[44]ReyndersE, PintelonR, de RoeckG, 2008. Uncertainty bounds on modal parameters obtained from stochastic subspace identification. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 22(4):948-969.

[45]ReyndersE, MaesK, LombaertG, et al., 2016. Uncertainty quantification in operational modal analysis with stochastic subspace identification: validation and applications. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 66-67:13-30.

[46]SadeqiA, EsfandiariA, SanayeiM, et al., 2022. Automated operational modal analysis based on long-term records: a case study of Milad Tower structural health monitoring. Structural Control and Health Monitoring, 29(10):e3037.

[47]SaxenaA, PrasadM, GuptaA, et al., 2017. A review of clustering techniques and developments. Neurocomputing, 267:664-681.

[48]SunLM, ShangZQ, XiaY, et al., 2020. Review of bridge structural health monitoring aided by big data and artificial intelligence: from condition assessment to damage detection. Journal of Structural Engineering, 146(5):04020073.

[49]SunM, AlamdariMM, KalhoriH, 2017. Automated operational modal analysis of a cable-stayed bridge. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 22(12):05017012.

[50]WuWH, WangSW, ChenCC, et al., 2019. Modal parameter identification for closely spaced modes of civil structures based on an upgraded stochastic subspace methodology. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 15(3):296-313.

[51]WuY, FuHR, BianXC, et al., 2023. Impact of extreme climate and train traffic loads on the performance of high-speed railway geotechnical infrastructures. Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE A, 24(3):189-205.

[52]YaghoubiV, VakilzadehMK, AbrahamssonTJS, 2018. Automated modal parameter estimation using correlation analysis and bootstrap sampling. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 100:289-310.

[53]YunCB, ChoS, ParkHJ, et al., 2014. Smart wireless sensing and assessment for civil infrastructure. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 10(4):534-550.

[54]ZengJC, HuZ, 2022. Automated operational modal analysis using variational Gaussian mixture model. Engineering Structures, 273:115139.