Full Text:   <1075>

Summary:  <709>

CLC number: TP311

On-line Access: 2014-12-23

Received: 2014-02-07

Revision Accepted: 2014-08-15

Crosschecked: 2014-12-08

Cited: 2

Clicked: 3927

Citations:  Bibtex RefMan EndNote GB/T7714




-   Go to

Article info.
Open peer comments

Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering  2015 Vol.16 No.1 P.43-69


Towards a self-adaptive service-oriented methodology based on extended SOMA

Author(s):  Alireza Parvizi-Mosaed, Shahrouz Moaven, Jafar Habibi, Ghazaleh Beigi, Mahdieh Naser-Shariat

Affiliation(s):  Computer Engineering Department, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran 11155-11365, Iran

Corresponding email(s):   aparvizi@ce.sharif.edu, moaven@ce.sharif.edu, jhabibi@sharif.edu, ghbeigi@ce.sharif.edu, nasershariat@ce.sharif.edu

Key Words:  Service-oriented architecture, Self-adaptive process, Architectural pattern, Quality attribute, Adaptation pattern, Architectural tactic

Alireza Parvizi-Mosaed, Shahrouz Moaven, Jafar Habibi, Ghazaleh Beigi, Mahdieh Naser-Shariat. Towards a self-adaptive service-oriented methodology based on extended SOMA[J]. Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering, 2015, 16(1): 43-69.

@article{title="Towards a self-adaptive service-oriented methodology based on extended SOMA",
author="Alireza Parvizi-Mosaed, Shahrouz Moaven, Jafar Habibi, Ghazaleh Beigi, Mahdieh Naser-Shariat",
journal="Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering",
publisher="Zhejiang University Press & Springer",

%0 Journal Article
%T Towards a self-adaptive service-oriented methodology based on extended SOMA
%A Alireza Parvizi-Mosaed
%A Shahrouz Moaven
%A Jafar Habibi
%A Ghazaleh Beigi
%A Mahdieh Naser-Shariat
%J Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering
%V 16
%N 1
%P 43-69
%@ 2095-9184
%D 2015
%I Zhejiang University Press & Springer
%DOI 10.1631/FITEE.1400040

T1 - Towards a self-adaptive service-oriented methodology based on extended SOMA
A1 - Alireza Parvizi-Mosaed
A1 - Shahrouz Moaven
A1 - Jafar Habibi
A1 - Ghazaleh Beigi
A1 - Mahdieh Naser-Shariat
J0 - Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering
VL - 16
IS - 1
SP - 43
EP - 69
%@ 2095-9184
Y1 - 2015
PB - Zhejiang University Press & Springer
ER -
DOI - 10.1631/FITEE.1400040

We propose a self-adaptive process (SAP) that maintains the software architecture quality using the MAPE-K standard model. The proposed process can be plugged into various software development processes and service-oriented methodologies due to its explicitly defined inputs and outputs. To this aim, the proposed SAP is integrated with the service-oriented modeling and application (SOMA) methodology in a two-layered structure to create a novel methodology, named self-adaptive service-oriented architecture methodology (SASOAM), which provides a semi-automatic self-aware method by the composition of architectural tactics. Moreover, the maintenance activity of SOMA is improved using architectural and adaptive patterns, which results in controlling the software architecture quality. The improvement in the maintainability of SOMA is demonstrated by an analytic hierarchy process (AHP) based evaluation method. Furthermore, the proposed method is applied to a case study to represent the feasibility and practicality of SASOAM.

The paper proposes a novel self-adaptive process which adapts a service-based application on the basis of the MAPE-K reference model in case of deviance from its software quality. The proposed process is integrated with the existing SOMA methodology to define a novel methodology called SASOAM. The paper outlined the proposed method well.




Darkslateblue:Affiliate; Royal Blue:Author; Turquoise:Article


[1]Andersson, J., Baresi, L., Bencomo, N., et al., 2013. Software engineering processes for self-adaptive systems. Software Engineering for Self-Adaptive Systems II, p.51-75.

[2]André, F., Daubert, E., Gauvrit, G., 2010. Towards a generic context-aware framework for self-adaptation of service-oriented architectures. 5th Int. Conf. on Internet and Web Applications and Services, p.309-314.

[3]Ardagna, D., Pernici, B., 2007. Adaptive service composition in flexible processes. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng., 33(6):369-384.

[4]Arevalo, G., Buchli, F., Nierstrasz, O., 2004. Detecting implicit collaboration patterns. 11th Working Conf. on Reverse Engineering, p.122-131.

[5]Arsanjani, A., Ghosh, S., Allam, A., et al., 2008. SOMA: a method for developing service-oriented solutions. IBM Syst. J., 47(3):377-396.

[6]Babar, M.A., 2004. Scenarios, quality attributes, and patterns: capturing and using their synergistic relationships for product line architectures. 11th Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conf., p.574-578.

[7]Bachmann, F., Bass, L., Klein, M., 2002. Illuminating the Fundamental Contributors to Software Architecture Quality. Technical Report No. CNU/SEI-2002-TR-025, Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA.

[8]Bachmann, F., Bass, L., Kelin, M., 2003. Deriving Architectural Tactics: a Step Toward Methodical Architectural Design. Technical Report No. CMU/SEI-2003-TR-004, Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA.

[9]Bachmann, F., Bass, L., Nord, R., 2007. Modifiability Tactics. Technical Report No. CMU/SEI-2007-TR-002, Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA.

[10]Bass, L., John, B.E., 2003. Linking usability to software architecture patterns through general scenarios. J. Syst. Softw., 66(3):187-197.

[11]Bass, L., Clements, P., Kazman, R., 1998. Software Architecture in Practice. Addison-Wesley, Boston, USA, p.1-307.

[12]Bhakti, M.A.C., Abdullah, A.B., Jung, L.T., 2010. Autonomic, self-organizing service-oriented architecture in service ecosystem. 4th IEEE Int. Conf. on Digital Ecosystems and Technologies, p.153-158.

[13]Boehm, B.W., Brown, J.R., Lipow, M., 1976. Quantitative evaluation of software quality. 2nd Int. Conf. on Software Engineering, p.592-605.

[14]Cardellini, V., Casalicchio, E., Grassi, V., et al., 2009. QoS-driven runtime adaptation of service oriented architectures. Proc. 7th Joint Meeting of the European Software Engineering Conf. and the ACM SIGSOFT Symp. on the Foundations of Software Engineering, p.131-140.

[15]Cardellini, V., Casalicchio, E., Grassi, V., et al., 2012. MOSES: a framework for QoS driven runtime adaptation of service-oriented systems. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng., 38(5):1138-1159.

[16]Castro, E., 2000. XML for the World Wide Web: Visual QuickStart Guide. Peachpit Press, USA, p.21-54.

[17]Coad, P., 1992. Object-oriented patterns. Commun. ACM, 35(9):152-159.

[18]de Lemos, R., Giese, H., Müller, H.A., et al., 2013. Software engineering for self-adaptive systems: a second research roadmap. Software Engineering for Self-Adaptive Systems II, p.1-32.

[19]di Nitto, E., Ghezzi, C., Metzger, A., et al., 2008. A journey to highly dynamic, self-adaptive service-based applications. Autom. Softw. Eng., 15(3-4):313-341.

[20]Dromey, R.G., 1995. A model for software product quality. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng., 21(2):146-162.

[21]Fielding, R.T., 2000. Architecture Styles and the Design of Network-Based Software Architectures. PhD Thesis, University of California, Irvine, USA.

[22]Fitzpatrick, R., 1996. Software Quality: Definitions and Strategic Issues. Technical Report No. 1, Staffordshire University, Staffordshire, UK.

[23]Fuhr, A., Horn, T., Riediger, V., et al., 2013. Model-driven software migration into service-oriented architectures. Comput. Sci.-Res. Devel., 28(1):65-84.

[24]Gacek, C., Giese, H., Hadar, E., 2008. Friends or foes?—a conceptual analysis of self-adaptation and IT change management. Proc. Int. Workshop on Software Engineering for Adaptive and Self-Managing Systems, p.121-128.

[25]Ganter, B., Wille, R., 1999. Formal Concept Analysis: Mathematical Foundations. Springer, Heidelberg.

[26]Gomaa, H., 2011. Pattern-based software design and adaptation. 3rd Int. Conf. on Pervasive Patterns and Applications, p.90-95.

[27]Gomaa, H., Hussein, M., 2004. Software reconfiguration patterns for dynamic evolution of software architectures. Proc. 4th Working IEEE/IFIP Conf. on Software Architecture, p.79-88.

[28]Gomaa, H., Hashimoto, K., Kim, M., et al., 2010. Software adaptation patterns for service-oriented architectures. Proc. ACM Symp. on Applied Computing, p.462-469.

[29]Gu, T., Pung, H.K., Zhang, D.Q., 2005. A service-oriented middleware for building context-aware services. J. Network Comput. Appl., 28(1):1-18.

[30]Haase, P., Lewen, H., Studer, R., et al., 2008. The NeOn ontology engineering toolkit. WWW.

[31]Harrison, N.B., Avgeriou, P., 2010a. How do architecture patterns and tactics interact a model and annotation. J. Syst. Softw., 83(10):1735-1758.

[32]Harrison, N.B., Avgeriou, P., 2010b. Implementing reliability: the interaction of requirements, tactics and architecture patterns. Architecting Dependable Systems VII, 6420:97-122.

[33]Hull, R., Hill, M., Berardi, D., 2005. Semantic Web Services Usage Scenario: e-Service Composition in a Behavior Based Framework. Semantic Web Services Initiative Language.

[34]Kang, K.C., Cohen, S.G., Hess, J.A., et al., 1990. Feature-Oriented Domain Analysis (FODA) Feasibility Study. Technical Report No. CMU/SEI-90-TR-21, Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA.

[35]Kazman, R., Carrière, S.J., Woods, S.G., 2000. Toward a discipline of scenario-based architectural engineering. Ann. Softw. Eng., 9(1-2):5-33.

[36]Kephart, J.O., Chess, D.M., 2003. The vision of autonomic computing. Computer, 36(1):41-50.

[37]Kim, D.K., Whittle, J., 2005. Generating UML models from domain patterns. 3rd ACIS Int. Conf. on Software Engineering Research, Management and Applications, p.166-173.

[38]Kim, S., Kim, D., Lu, L., et al., 2009. Quality-driven architecture development using architectural tactics. J. Syst. Softw., 82(8):1211-1231.

[39]Kozaki, K., Kitamura, Y., Ikeda, M., et al., 2002. Hozo: an environment for building/using ontologies based on a fundamental consideration of “role” and “relationship”. LNCS, 2473:213-218.

[40]Kramer, J., Magee, J., 1990. The evolving philosophers problem: dynamic change management. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng., 16(11):1293-1306.

[41]Kruchten, P.B., 1995. The 4+1 view model of architecture. IEEE Softw., 12(6):42-50.

[42]Lane, S., Bucchiarone, A., Richardson, I., 2012. SOAdapt: a process reference model for developing adaptable service-based applications. Inform. Softw. Technol., 54(3):299-316.

[43]Malek, S., Esfahani, N., Menasce, D.A., et al., 2009. Self-Architecting Software SYstems (SASSY) from QoS-annotated activity models. ICSE Workshop on Principles of Engineering Service Oriented Systems, p.62-69.

[44]Matinlassi, M., 2005. Quality-driven software architecture model transformation. Proc. 5th Working IEEE/IFIP Conf. on Software Architecture, p.199-200.

[45]McGuinness, D.L., van Harmelen, F., 2004. OWL Web Ontology Language Overview. W3C Recommendation.

[46]Menasce, D., Gomaa, H., Malek, S., et al., 2011. SASSY: a framework for self-architecting service-oriented systems. IEEE Softw., 28(6):78-85.

[47]Moaven, S., Ahmadi, H., Habibi, J., et al., 2008a. A decision support system for software architecture-style selection. 6th Int. Conf. on Software Engineering Research, Management and Applications, p.213-220.

[48]Moaven, S., Habibi, J., Ahmadi, H., et al., 2008b. A fuzzy model for solving architecture styles selection multi-criteria problem. 2nd UKSIM European Symp. on Computer Modeling and Simulation, p.388-393.

[49]Moaven, S., Kamandi, A., Habibi, J., et al., 2009. Toward a framework for evaluating heterogeneous architecture styles. 1st Asian Conf. on Intelligent Information and Database Systems, p.155-160.

[50]Noy, N.F., Crubézy, M., Fergerson, R.W., et al., 2003. Protege-2000: an open-source ontology-development and knowledge-acquisition environment. Annual Symp. of the American Medical Informatics Association, p.953.

[51]Papazoglou, M.P., Heuvel, W.V.D., 2007. Service oriented architectures: approaches, technologies and research issues. VLDB J., 16(3):389-415.

[52]Ramsin, R., Paige, R.F., 2008. Process-centered review of object oriented software development methodologies. ACM Comput. Surv., 40(1):3.1-3.89.

[53]Rawashdeh, A., Matalkah, B., 2006. A new software quality model for evaluating COTS components. J. Comput. Sci., 2(4):373-381.

[54]Romay, M.D.P., Fernández-Sanz, L., Rodríguez, D., 2011. A systematic review of self-adaptation in service-oriented architectures. 6th Int. Conf. on Software Engineering Advances, p.331-337.

[55]Rosen, M., Lublinsky, B., Smith, K.T., et al., 2008. Applied SOA: Service-Oriented Architecture and Design Strategies. Wiley Publishing, Indianapolis, p.260-350.

[56]Saaty, T.L., 1980. The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw Hill, New York.

[57]Scott, J., Kazman, R., 2009. Realizing and Refining Architectural Tactics: Availability. Technical Report No. CMU/ SEI-2009-TR-006, Software Engineering Institute.

[58]Siljee, J., Bosloper, I., Nijhuis, J., et al., 2005. DySOA: making service systems self-adaptive. LNCS, 3826:255-268.

[59]Strang, T., Linnhoff-Popien, C., 2004. A context modeling survey. 1st Int. Workshop on Advanced Context Modeling, Reasoning and Management.

[60]Wang, S., Sun, Q., Yang, F., 2010. Towards web service selection based on QoS estimation. Int. J. Web Grid Serv., 6(4):424-443.

[61]Weyns, D., Schmerl, B., Grassi, V., et al., 2013. On patterns for decentralized control in self-adaptive systems. Software Engineering for Self-Adaptive Systems II, p.76-107.

[62]Windisch, A., Schlatt, H., 2005. AADL-modelling of plug & play weapon system architecture. Systems Engineering AADL Workshop, p.121-132.

[63]Yang, S.J.H., Zhang, J., Chen, I.Y.L., 2008. A JESS-enabled context elicitation system for providing context-aware Web services. Expert Syst. Appl., 34(4):2254-2266.

Open peer comments: Debate/Discuss/Question/Opinion


Please provide your name, email address and a comment

Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE, 38 Zheda Road, Hangzhou 310027, China
Tel: +86-571-87952783; E-mail: cjzhang@zju.edu.cn
Copyright © 2000 - Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE