Full Text:   <2577>

Summary:  <1716>

CLC number: E917; TP391.9

On-line Access: 2017-03-10

Received: 2015-09-25

Revision Accepted: 2016-02-27

Crosschecked: 2017-02-21

Cited: 0

Clicked: 6396

Citations:  Bibtex RefMan EndNote GB/T7714


Zhi-xue Wang


-   Go to

Article info.
Open peer comments

Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering  2017 Vol.18 No.3 P.346-361


A quality requirements model and verification approach for system of systems based on description logic

Author(s):  Qing-long Wang, Zhi-xue Wang, Ting-ting Zhang, Wei-xing Zhu

Affiliation(s):  College of Command Information Systems, PLA University of Science and Technology, Nanjing 210007, China; more

Corresponding email(s):   jsxq901901@163.com, wzxcx801@163.com

Key Words:  System of systems (SoS), Cloud model, Description logic (DL), Requirements verification

Qing-long Wang, Zhi-xue Wang, Ting-ting Zhang, Wei-xing Zhu. A quality requirements model and verification approach for system of systems based on description logic[J]. Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering, 2017, 18(3): 346-361.

@article{title="A quality requirements model and verification approach for system of systems based on description logic",
author="Qing-long Wang, Zhi-xue Wang, Ting-ting Zhang, Wei-xing Zhu",
journal="Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering",
publisher="Zhejiang University Press & Springer",

%0 Journal Article
%T A quality requirements model and verification approach for system of systems based on description logic
%A Qing-long Wang
%A Zhi-xue Wang
%A Ting-ting Zhang
%A Wei-xing Zhu
%J Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering
%V 18
%N 3
%P 346-361
%@ 2095-9184
%D 2017
%I Zhejiang University Press & Springer
%DOI 10.1631/FITEE.1500309

T1 - A quality requirements model and verification approach for system of systems based on description logic
A1 - Qing-long Wang
A1 - Zhi-xue Wang
A1 - Ting-ting Zhang
A1 - Wei-xing Zhu
J0 - Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering
VL - 18
IS - 3
SP - 346
EP - 361
%@ 2095-9184
Y1 - 2017
PB - Zhejiang University Press & Springer
ER -
DOI - 10.1631/FITEE.1500309

System of systems engineering (SoSE) involves the complex procedure of translating capability needs into the high-level requirements for system of systems (SoS) and evaluating how the SoS quality requirements meet their capability needs. One of the key issues is to model the SoS requirements and automate the verification procedure. To solve the problem of modeling and verification, meta-models are proposed to refine both functional and non-functional characteristics of the SoS requirements. A domain-specific modeling language is defined by extending Unified Modeling Language (UML) class and association with fuzzy constructs to model the vague and uncertain concepts of the SoS quality requirements. The efficiency evaluation function of the cloud model is introduced to evaluate the efficiency of the SoS quality requirements. Then a concise algorithm transforms the fuzzy UML models into the description logic (DL) ontology so that the verification can be automated with a DL reasoner. This method implements modeling and verification of high-level SoS quality requirements. A crisp case is used to facilitate and demonstrate the correctness and feasibility of this method.

This research paper proposes an interesting approach within the Research area of SoSE, although the applicability and feasibility of this approach remain unclear. The paper is well structured and presented.


概要:在体系顶层设计问题中,体系质量需求分析的关键是体系需求的建模以及自动验证,需要合适的建模方法来描述体系质量需求以及验证质量需求是否满足体系的能力需求。针对体系质量需求建模和验证问题,本文提出一种基于描述逻辑的体系质量需求建模与验证方法。首先,为解决体系功能和非功能需求的描述问题,通过添加模糊构造子扩展统一建模语言(Unified Modeling Language, UML)中的类和关系并定义了基于元模型的领域特定建模语言以实现体系质量需求中模糊和不确定概念的建模。随后提出了基于云模型的体系质量需求评估方法实现了对体系质量需求的评估。然后,提出了模型转换算法将模糊UML构建的体系需求模型转换为描述逻辑本体模型,并通过使用描述逻辑本体推理工具实现需求模型的自动化验证。最后,通过一个案例验证和演示了本文方法的正确性和可行性。


Darkslateblue:Affiliate; Royal Blue:Author; Turquoise:Article


[1]Ahmed, R., Robinson, S., 2007. Simulation in business and industry: how simulation context can affect simulation practice Proc. Spring Simulation Multiconference, p.152-159.

[2]Bagdatli, B., Mavris, D., 2012. Use of high-level architecture discrete event simulation in a system of systems design. IEEE Aerospace Conf., p.1-13.

[3]Chapurlat, V., Braesch, C., 2008. Verification, validation, qualification and certification of enterprise models: statements and opportunities. Comput. Ind., 59(7):711-721.

[4]Chapurlat, V., Kamsu-Fogum, B., Prunet, F., 2006. A formal verification framework and associated tools for enterprise modeling: application to UEML. Comput. Ind., 57(2): 153-166.

[5]Dong, Q.C., Wang, Z.X., Chen, G.Y., et al., 2012. Domain-specific modeling and verification for C4ISR capability requirements. J. Cent. South Univ., 19(5):1334-1341.

[6]Ender, T., Leurck, R.F., Weaver, B., et al., 2010. Systems of systems analysis of ballistic missile defense architecture effectiveness through surrogate modeling and simulation. IEEE Syst. J., 4(2):156-166.

[7]Eusgeld, I., Nan, C., Dietz, S., 2011. “System-of-systems” approach for interdependent critical infrastructures. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Safety, 96(6):679-686.

[8]Fernando, B., Miguel, D., Juan, G.R., 2009. Fuzzy description logics under Godel semantics. Int. J. Approx. Reas., 50(3):494-514.

[9]Fotrousi, F., Fricker, S.A., Fiedler, M., 2014. Quality requirements elicitation based on inquiry of quality-impact relationships. 22nd IEEE Int. Requirements Engineering Conf., p.303-312.

[10]Gao, J.X., Li, D.Q., Havlin, S., 2014. From a single network to a network of networks. Nat. Sci. Rev., 1(3):346-356.

[11]Ge, B.F., Hipel, K.W., Yang, K.W., et al., 2013. A data-centric capability focused approach for system-of-systems architecture modeling and analysis. Syst. Eng., 16(3):363-377.

[12]Ge, B.F., Hipel, K.W., Fang, L.P., et al., 2014a. An interactive portfolio decision analysis approach for system of systems architecting using the graph model for conflict resolution. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern., 44(10):1328-1346.

[13]Ge, B.F., Hipel, K.W., Yang, K.W., et al., 2014b. A novel executable modeling approach for system of systems architecture. IEEE Syst. J., 8(1):4-13.

[14]Grigoroudis, E., Phillis, Y.A., 2013. Modeling healthcare system of systems: a mathematical programming approach. IEEE Syst. J., 7(4):571-580.

[15]Guizzardi, G., 2005. Ontological Foundations for Structural Conceptual Models. PhD Thesis, Centre for Telematics and Information Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands.

[16]Haimes, Y.Y., 2012. Modeling complex systems of systems with phantom system models. Syst. Eng., 15(3):333-346.

[17]Holt, J., Perry, S., Payne, R., 2015. A model-based approach for requirements engineering for systems of systems. IEEE Syst. J., 9(1):252-262.

[18]Huynh, T.V., Kessler, A., Oravec, J., 2011. Orthogonal array experiment in systems engineering and architecting. Syst. Eng., 14(2):208-222.

[19]Khan, I., 2010. Methodology for the development of executable system architecture. Proc. 8th Int. Conf. on FIT, p.1-4.

[20]Ma, Z.M., Zhang, F., Cheng, J., et al., 2011. Representing and reasoning on fuzzy UML models: a description logic approach. Expert Syst. Appl., 38(3):2536-2549.

[21]Ma, Z.M., Li, Y., Zhang, F., 2012. Modeling fuzzy information in UML class diagrams and object-oriented database models. Fuzzy Sets Syst., 186(1):26-46.

[22]Moynihan, R.A., Reining, R.C., Salamone, P.P., et al., 2009. Enterprise scale portfolio analysis at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). Syst. Eng., 12(2):155-168.

[23]Ncube, C., Lim, S.L., Dogan, H., 2013. Identifying top challenges for international research on requirements engineering for systems of systems engineering. 21st IEEE Int. Requirements Engineering Conf., p.342-344.

[24]Office of the Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Technology and Logistics (ODUSD (A&T)), 2008. Systems and Software Engineering, Systems Engineering Guide for Systems of Systems, Version 1.0. Technical Report No. ODUSD (A&T)SSE, Washington, D.C., USA.

[25]Petersen, K., Khurum, M., Angelis, L., 2014. Reasons for bottlenecks in very large-scale system of systems development. Inform. Softw. Techol., 56(10):1403-1420.

[26]Regnell, B., Svensson, R.B., Olsson, T., 2008. Supporting roadmapping of quality requirements. IEEE Softw., 25(2):42-47.

[27]Stoilos, G., Stamou, G., Pan, J.Z., et al., 2007. Reasoning with very expressive fuzzy description logics. J. Artif. Intell. Res., 30:273-320.

[28]Wang, R., Dagli, C.H., 2011. Executable system architecting using systems modeling language in conjunction with colored Petri nets in a model driven systems development process. Syst. Eng., 14(4):383-409.

Open peer comments: Debate/Discuss/Question/Opinion


Please provide your name, email address and a comment

Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE, 38 Zheda Road, Hangzhou 310027, China
Tel: +86-571-87952783; E-mail: cjzhang@zju.edu.cn
Copyright © 2000 - 2024 Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE