CLC number: TP391.72; TP391.73; TH164
On-line Access: 2024-08-27
Received: 2023-10-17
Revision Accepted: 2024-05-08
Crosschecked: 2010-10-29
Cited: 26
Clicked: 6566
Nur Saaidah Abu Bakar, Mohd Rizal Alkahari, Hambali Boejang. Analysis on fused deposition modelling performance[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University Science A, 2010, 11(12): 972-977.
@article{title="Analysis on fused deposition modelling performance",
author="Nur Saaidah Abu Bakar, Mohd Rizal Alkahari, Hambali Boejang",
journal="Journal of Zhejiang University Science A",
volume="11",
number="12",
pages="972-977",
year="2010",
publisher="Zhejiang University Press & Springer",
doi="10.1631/jzus.A1001365"
}
%0 Journal Article
%T Analysis on fused deposition modelling performance
%A Nur Saaidah Abu Bakar
%A Mohd Rizal Alkahari
%A Hambali Boejang
%J Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE A
%V 11
%N 12
%P 972-977
%@ 1673-565X
%D 2010
%I Zhejiang University Press & Springer
%DOI 10.1631/jzus.A1001365
TY - JOUR
T1 - Analysis on fused deposition modelling performance
A1 - Nur Saaidah Abu Bakar
A1 - Mohd Rizal Alkahari
A1 - Hambali Boejang
J0 - Journal of Zhejiang University Science A
VL - 11
IS - 12
SP - 972
EP - 977
%@ 1673-565X
Y1 - 2010
PB - Zhejiang University Press & Springer
ER -
DOI - 10.1631/jzus.A1001365
Abstract: fused deposition modelling (FDM) is one of rapid prototyping (RP) technologies which uses an additive fabrication approach. Each commercially available FDM model has different types of process parameters for different applications. Some of the desired parts require excellent surface finish as well as good tolerance. The most common parameters requiring setup are the raster angle, tool path, slice thickness, build orientation, and deposition speed. The purpose of this paper is to discuss the process parameters of FDM Prodigy Plus (Stratasys, Inc., Eden Prairie, MN, USA). Various selected parameters were tested and the optimum condition was proposed. The quality of the parts produced was accessed in terms of dimensional accuracy and surface finish. The optimum parameters obtained were then applied in the fabrication of the master pattern prior to silicone rubber moulding (SRM). These parameters would reduce the post processing time. The dimensional accuracy and surface roughness were analyzed using coordinate measuring machine (CMM) and surface roughness tester, respectively. Based on this study, the recommended parameters will improve the quality of the FDM parts produced in terms of dimensional accuracy and surface roughness for the application of SRM.
[1]Ahn, D., Kweon, J.H., Kwon, S., Song, J., Lee, S., 2009. Representation of surface roughness in fused deposition modeling. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 209(15-16):5593-5600.
[2]Anitha, R., Arunachalam, S., Radhakrishnan, P., 2001. Critical parameters influencing the quality of prototypes in fused deposition modelling. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 118(1-3):385-388.
[3]Bellini, A., Güçeri, S., Bertoldi, M., 2004. Liquefier dynamics in fused deposition. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, 126(2):237-246.
[4]Chua, C.K, Leong, K.F., Lim, C.S., 2003. Rapid Prototyping: Principles and Applications (2nd Ed.). World Scientific, Singapore, p.127-128.
[5]Grimm, T., 2003. Fused Deposition Modeling: A Technology Evaluation. Available from http://www. time-compression.com/articles/html/fused_deposition.html [Accessed on Apr. 4, 2010]
[6]Han, W., Jafari, M.A., Danforth, S.C., Safari, A., 2002. Tool path-based deposition planning in fused deposition process. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, 124(2):237-246.
[7]Hanumaiah, N., Ravi, B., 2007. Rapid tooling form accuracy estimation using region elimination adaptive search based sampling technique. Rapid Prototyping Journal, 13(3):182-190.
[8]Lee, B.H., Abdullah, J., Khan, Z.A., 2005. Optimization or rapid prototyping parameters for production of flexible ABS object. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 169(1):54-61.
[9]Lee, C.S., Kim, S.G., Kim, H.J., Ahn, S.J., 2007. Measurement of anisotrophic compressive strength of rapid prototyping parts. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 187-188(12):627-630.
[10]Liou, F.W., 2008. Rapid Prototyping and Engineering Applications, a Toolbox for Prototype Development. CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group, London.
[11]Magrab, E.D., 1997. Integrated Product and Process Design and Development, the Product Realization Process. CRC Press, London, p.192.
[12]Mahesh, S., Wong, Y.S., Fuh, J.Y.H., Loh, H.T., 2004. Benchmarking for comparative evaluation of RP systems and processes. Rapid Prototyping Journal, 10(2):123-135.
[13]Nooraini, R., 2006. Rapid Prototyping Principles and Applications. Wiley, New Jersey, p.86.
[14]Rahmati, S., Akbari, J., Barati, E., 2007. Dimensional accuracy analysis of wax patterns created by RTV silicon rubber molding using Taguchi approach. Rapid Prototyping Journal, 13(2):115-122.
[15]Sun, Q., Rizvi, G.M., Bellehumeur, C.T., Gu, P., 2008. Effect of processing conditions on the bonding quality of FDM polymer filaments. Rapid Prototyping Journal, 14(2):72-80.
[16]Zhang, Y., Chou, K., 2008. A parametric study of part distortions in fused deposition modelling using three-dimensional finite element analysis. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 222(8):959-967.
Open peer comments: Debate/Discuss/Question/Opinion
<1>
coordinate measuring machine@http://www.novacam.com/products/profilometers/<profilometer@gmail.com>
2012-02-09 10:39:35
What coordinate measuring machine was used in this study?