CLC number:
On-line Access: 2022-05-23
Received: 2020-12-25
Revision Accepted: 2021-05-06
Crosschecked: 2022-05-23
Cited: 0
Clicked: 5458
Dong-peng JIA, Kai YANG, Yu PAN, Xi-peng LI, Ning WANG. Effect of the micro vortex generator on the characteristics of vaporized RP-3 kerosene combustion in supersonic flows[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University Science A, 2022, 23(5): 405-414.
@article{title="Effect of the micro vortex generator on the characteristics of vaporized RP-3 kerosene combustion in supersonic flows",
author="Dong-peng JIA, Kai YANG, Yu PAN, Xi-peng LI, Ning WANG",
journal="Journal of Zhejiang University Science A",
volume="23",
number="5",
pages="405-414",
year="2022",
publisher="Zhejiang University Press & Springer",
doi="10.1631/jzus.A2000620"
}
%0 Journal Article
%T Effect of the micro vortex generator on the characteristics of vaporized RP-3 kerosene combustion in supersonic flows
%A Dong-peng JIA
%A Kai YANG
%A Yu PAN
%A Xi-peng LI
%A Ning WANG
%J Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE A
%V 23
%N 5
%P 405-414
%@ 1673-565X
%D 2022
%I Zhejiang University Press & Springer
%DOI 10.1631/jzus.A2000620
TY - JOUR
T1 - Effect of the micro vortex generator on the characteristics of vaporized RP-3 kerosene combustion in supersonic flows
A1 - Dong-peng JIA
A1 - Kai YANG
A1 - Yu PAN
A1 - Xi-peng LI
A1 - Ning WANG
J0 - Journal of Zhejiang University Science A
VL - 23
IS - 5
SP - 405
EP - 414
%@ 1673-565X
Y1 - 2022
PB - Zhejiang University Press & Springer
ER -
DOI - 10.1631/jzus.A2000620
Abstract: To investigate the characteristics of vaporized RP-3 kerosene combustion in a scramjet combustor enhanced by the micro vortex generator (MVG), a series of experiments are carried out based on the advanced combustion diagnosis technique. The high-enthalpy incoming flow is accelerated to supersonic through a Mach 2.52 nozzle, the total pressure and temperature of which are 1.6 MPa and 1486 K, respectively. The effect of MVG on the ignition process, flame distribution, and combustor pressure along the bottom wall is well revealed, and the effects of the position and number of MVGs on stable combustion performance are analyzed. The results indicate that the development processes of the initial flame kernel with and without an MVG during ignition process show a similar behavior. The installation of an MVG can lift the shear layer, promote the penetration of flame deeper into the mainstream, and expand the area of the reactive region. Reducing the distance between the MVG and the injection position and increasing the number of MVGs are regarded as effective ways of improving the mixing degree of fuel and air with a resultant intensification of chemical reactions and flame luminescence. The effect of mixing and subsequent combustion is enhanced by shortening the distance between the MVG and the injection position. As the layout schemes of the MVG vary, the pressure distribution between the injection position and the leading edge of the cavity changes considerably, while that in the cavity remains almost constant. Increasing the number of MVGs is also beneficial for improving the premixed degree of fuel and incoming flow and results in more violent chemical reactions downstream of the cavity.
[1]AguileraC, YuKH, 2015. Supersonic mixing enhancement using fin-guided fuel injection. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 31(6):1532-1543.
[2]AguileraC, YuKH, 2017. Effect of fin-guided fuel injection on dual-mode scramjet operation. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 33(4):927-938.
[3]BaigmohammadiM, TabejamaatS, JavanbakhtZ, 2019. Numerical study of methane-oxygen premixed flame characteristics in non-adiabatic cylindrical meso-scale reactors with the backward-facing step. Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Mechanical Engineering, 43(S1):117-140.
[4]BaoH, ZhouJ, PanY, 2015. Effect of cavity configuration on kerosene spark ignition in a scramjet combustor at Ma 4.5 flight condition. Acta Astronautica, 117:368-375.
[5]Ben-YakarA, HansonRK, 2001. Cavity flame-holders for ignition and flame stabilization in scramjets: an overview. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 17(4):869-877.
[6]ChoubeyG, DevarajanY, HuangW, et al., 2019. Recent advances in cavity-based scramjet engine–a brief review. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 44(26):13895-13909.
[7]FanXJ, YuG, LiJG, et al., 2006. Investigation of vaporized kerosene injection and combustion in a supersonic model combustor. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 22(1):103-110.
[8]FerraiuoloM, PetrilloW, RiccioA, 2017. On the thermo-structural response of a composite closeout in a regeneratively cooled thrust chamber. Aerospace Science and Technology, 71:402-411.
[9]HuangW, DuZB, YanL, et al., 2019. Supersonic mixing in airbreathing propulsion systems for hypersonic flights. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 109:100545.
[10]HuangW, ChangJT, YanL, 2020. Mixing and combustion in supersonic/hypersonic flows. Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE A (Applied Physics & Engineering), 21(7):609-613.
[11]JeongE, O’ByrneS, JeungIS, et al., 2020. The effect of fuel injection location on supersonic hydrogen combustion in a cavity-based model scramjet combustor. Energies, 13(1):193.
[12]KummithaOR, PandeyKM, GuptaR, 2018a. CFD analysis of a scramjet combustor with cavity based flame holders. Acta Astronautica, 144:244-253.
[13]KummithaOR, PandeyKM, GuptaR, 2018b. Optimization of scramjet performance with different fuel injection techniques and flame holder cavities. Acta Astronautica, 152:908-919.
[14]LeJL, YangSH, LiHB, 2012. Analysis and correlation of flame stability limits in supersonic flow with cavity flameholder. Proceedings of the 18th AIAA/3AF International Space Planes and Hypersonic Systems and Technologies Conference, p.2012-5948.
[15]LiCL, ZhaoX, XiaZX, et al., 2019. Influence of the vortex generator on the performance of solid rocket scramjet combustor. Acta Astronautica, 164:174-183.
[16]LiLQ, HuangW, YanL, 2017a. Mixing augmentation induced by a vortex generator located upstream of the transverse gaseous jet in supersonic flows. Aerospace Science and Technology, 68:77-89.
[17]LiLQ, HuangW, YanL, et al., 2017b. Mixing enhancement and penetration improvement induced by pulsed gaseous jet and a vortex generator in supersonic flows. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 42(30):19318-19330.
[18]LiZX, Barzegar GerdroodbaryM, MoradiR, et al., 2020a. Effect of inclined block on fuel mixing of multi hydrogen jets in scramjet engine. Aerospace Science and Technology, 105:106035.
[19]LiZX, Barzegar GerdroodbaryM, SheikholeslamiM, et al., 2020b. Mixing enhancement of multi hydrogen jets through the cavity flameholder with extended pylon. Acta Astronautica, 175:300-307.
[20]LiuCY, ZhaoYH, WangZG, et al., 2017. Dynamics and mixing mechanism of transverse jet injection into a supersonic combustor with cavity flameholder. Acta Astronautica, 136:90-100.
[21]LiuCY, SunMB, WangHB, et al., 2020. Ignition and flame stabilization characteristics in an ethylene-fueled scramjet combustor. Aerospace Science and Technology, 106:106186.
[22]LiuXL, Barzegar GerdroodbaryM, SheikholeslamiM, et al., 2020. Effect of strut angle on performance of hydrogen multi-jets inside the cavity at combustion chamber. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 45(55):31179-31187.
[23]NeillSM, PesyridisA, 2017. Modeling of supersonic combustion systems for sustained hypersonic flight. Energies, 10(11):1900.
[24]NingW, YuP, JinZ, 2013. Research status of active cooling of endothermic hydrocarbon fueled scramjet engine. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 227(11):1780-1794.
[25]PillaiAL, NagaoJ, AwaneR, et al., 2020. Influences of liquid fuel atomization and flow rate fluctuations on spray combustion instabilities in a backward-facing step combustor. Combustion and Flame, 220:337-356.
[26]QiuHC, ZhangJL, SunXX, et al., 2020. Flowing residence characteristics in a dual-mode scramjet combustor equipped with strut flame holder. Aerospace Science and Technology, 99:105718.
[27]RavindranM, BricalliM, PudseyA, et al., 2019. Mixing characteristics of cracked gaseous hydrocarbon fuels in a scramjet combustor. Acta Astronautica, 162:168-184.
[28]SaravananG, SureshC, 2012. Numerical simulation of mixing enhancement in scramjet using micro vortex generator. Procedia Engineering, 38:3969-3976.
[29]ShiDY, SongWY, WangYH, et al., 2017. Effects of cavity configurations on flameholding and performances of kerosene fueled scramjet combustor. International Journal of Turbo & Jet-Engines, 34(3):211-220.
[30]TuncerO, 2010. Combustion in a ramjet combustor with cavity flame holder. Proceedings of the 48th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, p.18086-18097.
[31]UrzayJ, 2018. Supersonic combustion in air-breathing propulsion systems for hypersonic flight. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 50:593-627.
[32]Vincent-RandonnierA, RouxelB, RouxP, et al., 2008. Experimental investigations on the self-ignition of a thermally decomposed endothermic fuel in hot supersonic air flow in the MPP-LAERTE combustion test bench. Proceedings of the 15th AIAA International Space Planes and Hypersonic Systems and Technologies Conference, p.1501-1508.
[33]YangK, PanY, WangZG, et al., 2020. Experimental investigation of the ignition characteristics of vaporized RP-3 kerosene in supersonic flow. Acta Astronautica, 174:1-10.
[34]ZhangDQ, SongWY, 2017. Experimental study of cone-struts and cavity flameholders in a kerosene-fueled round scramjet combustor. Acta Astronautica, 139:24-33.
[35]ZhangJC, WangZG, SunMB, et al., 2020. Effect of the backward facing step on a transverse jet in supersonic crossflow. Energies, 13(16):4170.
[36]ZhangJL, ChangJT, TianHM, et al., 2020. Flame interaction characteristics in scramjet combustor equipped with strut/wall combined fuel injectors. Combustion Science and Technology, 192(10):1863-1886.
Open peer comments: Debate/Discuss/Question/Opinion
<1>