
CLC number: TN95
On-line Access: 2024-11-08
Received: 2024-04-08
Revision Accepted: 2024-06-03
Crosschecked: 2024-11-08
Cited: 0
Clicked: 2598
Citations: Bibtex RefMan EndNote GB/T7714
Fangjun LIU, Jiaming SHEN, Jizhong SHEN. Research on electromagnetic interference resistance performance of three kinds of CMOS inverters[J]. Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering,in press.https://doi.org/10.1631/FITEE.2400264 @article{title="Research on electromagnetic interference resistance performance of three kinds of CMOS inverters", %0 Journal Article TY - JOUR
三种CMOS反相器抗电磁干扰性能研究浙江大学信息与电子工程学院,中国杭州市,310027 摘要:电磁干扰会影响CMOS电路工作性能,研究电路抗信号干扰能力将有利于设计性能更优的电路。电流型CMOS电路因在深亚微米工艺下相较于传统电路有高速度、低功耗等优势,近些年得到不断发展,其抗干扰能力值得进一步研究。文中介绍传统电压型CMOS、MOS电流型逻辑电路(MOS Current-Mode Logic,MCML)、电流型CMOS三种结构的非门电路。通过Cadence Virtuoso软件仿真模拟电磁干扰对三种非门电路的影响,并定义一个受干扰程度因子,用来研究比较不同干扰点、不同干扰波形、不同干扰频率在65纳米工艺下对电路的影响。并通过改变电流型CMOS电路输入端串联电阻值,研究干扰信号电阻与电路抗干扰性的关系。仿真结果表明:在高工作频率下,电流型CMOS电路具有更好的抗干扰性,且电流型CMOS电路工作频率越高,电路抗干扰性越强。此外,还研究了不同温度和不同工艺对三种电路抗干扰性能的影响。在-40 °C至125 °C温度范围内,温度越高,电压型CMOS和MCML型电路抗干扰能力越弱,电流型CMOS电路抗干扰能力越强。28纳米工艺下,电流型CMOS电路比其他两种电路的相对抗干扰能力更强;28纳米工艺下电压型CMOS和MCML电路的相对抗干扰能力与65纳米工艺下的相对抗干扰能力相似,而28纳米工艺下电流型CMOS电路的相对抗干扰能力比65纳米工艺下的相对抗干扰能力强。论文工作为设计抗电磁干扰的电流型CMOS电路提供依据。 关键词组: Darkslateblue:Affiliate; Royal Blue:Author; Turquoise:Article
Reference[1]Albertson RT, Arthur J, Rashid MH, 2006. Overview of electromagnetic interference. 38th North American Power Symp, p.263-266. ![]() [2]Backstrom MG, Lovstrand KG, 2004. Susceptibility of electronic systems to high-power microwaves: summary of test experience. IEEE Trans Electromagn Compat, 46(3):396-403. ![]() [3]Choudhary MS, Pudi NSAK, Redouté JM, et al., 2021. A methodology to emulate the effect of EMI in circuit simulators for wireline communication channel. IEEE Lett Electromagn Compat Pract Appl, 3(3):96-100. ![]() [4]Deutschmann B, Winkler G, 2023. Characterizing the electromagnetic immunity of operational amplifiers based on EMIRR and DPI. Int Symp on Electromagnetic Compatibility-EMC Europe, p.1-4. ![]() [5]Gupta P, Banerjee R, Sharma R, 2021. Low-voltage low-power CMOS-based current-mode implementation of digital logic gates and combinational circuits. J Circ Syst Comput, 30(12):>2150212>. ![]() [6]Hassan H, Anis M, Elmasry M, 2005. MOS current mode circuits: analysis, design, and variability. IEEE Trans Very Large Scale Integr (VLSI) Syst, 13(8):885-898. ![]() [7]Hu Y, Wang ZY, Chen H, et al., 2023. Research on radar jamming for detection performance. J Phys Conf Ser, 2517:012015. ![]() [8]Kim K, Iliadis AA, 2007a. Critical bit errors in CMOS digital inverters due to pulsed electromagnetic interference. Int Conf on Electromagnetics in Advanced Applications, p.217-220. ![]() [9]Kim K, Iliadis AA, 2007b. Critical upsets of CMOS inverters in static operation due to high-power microwave interference. IEEE Trans Electromagn Compat, 49(4):876-885. ![]() [10]Liang B, Ma K, Ding Z, et al., 2012. The structure design of MOS current mode logic adder. Int Conf on Microwave and Millimeter Wave Technology, p.1-4. ![]() [11]Lin JF, Chen YN, Zhao DY, et al., 2021. Simulation analysis of the influence of electromagnetic pulse power on the performance degradation of CMOS inverter. CIE Int Conf on Radar, p.1959-1962. ![]() [12]Mu J, Jia X, 2021. Simulation and analysis of the influence of artificial interference signal style on wireless security system performance. IEEE 4th Advanced Information Management, Communicates, Electronic and Automation Control Conf, p.2106-2109. ![]() [13]Powell T, Sule NH, Hemmady S, et al., 2018. Predictive model for extreme electromagnetic compatibility on CMOS inverters. Int Symp on Electromagnetic Compatibility, p.113-116. ![]() [14]Radasky WA, Baum CE, Wik MW, 2004. Introduction to the special issue on high-power electromagnetics (HPEM) and intentional electromagnetic interference (IEMI). IEEE Trans Electromagn Compat, 46(3):314-321. ![]() [15]Razavi B, 2000. Design of Analog CMOS Integrated Circuits. McGraw-Hill Higher Education, Burr Ridge, USA, p.17-18, 599. ![]() [16]Razavi B, 2008. Fundamentals of Microelectronics. John Wiley & Sons Inc, Hoboken, USA, p.282-284. ![]() [17]Redouté JM, Steyaert MSJ, 2010. EMI-resistant CMOS differential input stages. IEEE Trans Circ Syst I Regular Pap, 57(2):323-331. ![]() [18]Redouté JM, Richelli A, 2015. A methodological approach to EMI resistant analog integrated circuit design. IEEE Electromagn Compat Mag, 4(2):92-100. ![]() [19]Richelli A, 2012. Increasing EMI immunity in novel low-voltage CMOS OpAmps. IEEE Trans Electromagn Compat, 54(4):947-950. ![]() [20]Richelli A, Colalongo L, Kovacs-Vajna ZM, 2003. Increasing the immunity to electromagnetic interferences of CMOS OpAmps. IEEE Trans Reliab, 52(3):349-353. ![]() [21]Singh A, 2017. EMI harderend current mirror. IEEE Int Conf on Circuits and Systems, p.431-436. ![]() [22]Wang GJ, Zhang YZ, Zhao Y, et al., 2022. Design of GPR transmitting pulse signal based on FPGA. 41st Chinese Control Conf, p.3070-3074. ![]() [23]Wang HY, Li JY, Li H, et al., 2008. Experimental study and SPICE simulation of CMOS inverters latch-up effects due to high power microwave interference. Prog Electromagn Res, 87:313-330. ![]() [24]Wang HY, Hu B, Zou H, et al., 2017. Circuit modeling and simulation of CMOS circuits latchup induced by microwave pulse injection. Progress in Electromagnetics Research Symp-Fall, p.2988-2992. ![]() [25]Wunsch DC, Bell RR, 1968. Determination of threshold failure levels of semiconductor diodes and transistors due to pulse voltages. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci, 15(6):244-259. ![]() [26]Yamashina M, Yamada H, 1992. An MOS current mode logic (MCML) circuit for low-power sub-GHz processors. IEICE Trans Electron, E75-C(10):1181-1187. ![]() [27]Yao MQ, Sun X, 2019. He Figure transformation algorithm based on current-type CMOS circuit. 14th IEEE Int Conf on Electronic Measurement & Instruments, p.279-285. ![]() [28]Zupan D, Deutschmann B, 2020. Comparison of EMI improved differential input pair structures within an integrated folded cascode operational transconductance amplifier. Austrochip Workshop on Microelectronics, p.47-52. ![]() Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE, 38 Zheda Road, Hangzhou
310027, China
Tel: +86-571-87952783; E-mail: cjzhang@zju.edu.cn Copyright © 2000 - 2026 Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE | ||||||||||||||


ORCID:
Open peer comments: Debate/Discuss/Question/Opinion
<1>