Abstract: Cooperative guidance is a method for achieving combat objectives through information sharing and cooperative effects, and has emerged as a significant research area in the fields of missile guidance and systematic warfare. This study presents a systematic review and analysis of current research on cooperative guidance. First, a bibliometric analysis is conducted on 513 articles using the Scopus database and CiteSpace software to assess keyword clustering, keyword co-occurrence, and keyword burst, and to later visualize the results. Second, fundamental theories of cooperative guidance, including relative motion modeling methods, algebraic graph theory, and multi-agent consensus theory, are summarized. Subsequently, an overview of current cooperative laws and corresponding analysis methods is provided, with categorization based on the cooperative structure and convergence performance. Finally, we summarize current research developments based on five perspectives and propose a developmental framework based on five layers (cyber, physical, decision, information, and system), discussing potential future advancements in cooperative terminal guidance. This framework emphasizes five key areas of research: networked, heterogeneous, integrated, intelligent, and group cooperations, with the goal of offering trends and insights for future work.

基于知识图谱分析的协同末制导技术发展与未来展望综述

[1]AbdelhediF, KhlifRJ, NouriAS, et al., 2024. On the asymptotic stability of a new fractional-order sliding mode control with application to robotic systems. Fractals, 32(1):2450031.

[2]AhmedIK, FapojuwoAO, 2018. Stackelberg equilibria of an anti-jamming game in cooperative cognitive radio networks. IEEE Transactions on Cognitive Communications and Networking, 4(1):121-134.

[3]AiXL, WangLL, YuJQ, et al., 2019. Field-of-view constrained two-stage guidance law design for three-dimensional salvo attack of multiple missiles via an optimal control approach. Aerospace Science and Technology, 85:334-346.

[4]AlladiT, KohliV, ChamolaV, et al., 2023. A deep learning based misbehavior classification scheme for intrusion detection in cooperative intelligent transportation systems. Digital Communications and Networks, 9(5):1113-1122.

[5]AnK, GuoZY, HuangW, et al., 2022. A cooperative guidance approach based on the finite-time control theory for hypersonic vehicles. International Journal of Aeronautical and Space Sciences, 23(1):169-179.

[6]BaboşA, 2021. Artificial intelligence as a decision making tool for military leaders. Land Forces Academy Review, 26(4):269-273.

[7]BamisileO, ZhengZ, AdunH, et al., 2023. Development and prospect of flywheel energy storage technology: a CiteSpace-based visual analysis. Energy Reports, 9:‍494-505.

[8]BistronM, PiotrowskiZ, 2021. Artificial intelligence applications in military systems and their influence on sense of security of citizens. Electronics, 10(7):871.

[9]BurtonI, StraubJ, 2019. Autonomous distributed electronic warfare system of systems. Proceedings of the 14th Annual Conference System of Systems Engineering, p.96-101.

[10]CaoXW, FuruokaF, RasiahR, 2023. Knowledge mapping of industrial upgrading research: a visual analysis using CiteSpace. Sustainability, 15(24):16547.

[11]CevherFY, LeblebicioğluMK, 2023. Cooperative guidance law for high-speed and high-maneuverability air targets. Aerospace, 10(2):155.

[12]ChaiRQ, GuoYL, ZuoZY, et al., 2024. Cooperative motion planning and control for aerial-ground autonomous systems: methods and applications. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 146:101005.

[13]CheSP, KamphuisP, ZhangSN, et al., 2022. A visualization analysis of crisis and risk communication research using CiteSpace. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(5):2923.

[14]ChenJY, LinCY, PengD, et al., 2020. Fault diagnosis of rotating machinery: a review and bibliometric analysis. IEEE Access, 8:224985-225003.

[15]ChenQ, SunYX, ZhaoM, et al., 2021. Consensus-based cooperative formation guidance strategy for multiparafoil airdrop systems. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, 18(4):2175-2184.

[16]ChenQY, LeeSJ, 2021. Research status and trend of digital twin: visual knowledge mapping analysis. International Journal of Advanced Smart Convergence, 10(4):84-97.

[17]ChenSG, ChenY, PanCW, et al., 2023. Distributed adaptive platoon secure control on unmanned vehicles system for lane change under compound attacks. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 24(11):12637-12647.

[18]ChenY, WuSF, WangXL, 2022. Impact time and angle control optimal guidance with field-of-view constraint. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 45(12):2369-2378.

[19]ChenYT, HuMH, XuY, et al., 2023. Locally generalised multi-agent reinforcement learning for demand and capacity balancing with customised neural networks. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 36(4):338-353.

[20]ChenZY, ChenWC, LiuXM, et al., 2021. Three-dimensional fixed-time robust cooperative guidance law for simultaneous attack with impact angle constraint. Aerospace Science and Technology, 110:106523.

[21]ChiRH, HuiY, HuangB, et al., 2020. Adjacent-agent dynamic linearization-based iterative learning formation control. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, 50(10):4358-4369.

[22]CouzinID, KrauseJ, FranksNR, et al., 2005. Effective leadership and decision-making in animal groups on the move. Nature, 433(7025):513-516.

[23]DingH, WangDD, LiCJ, et al., 2024. Design of convergent and accurate guidance law with finite time in complex adversarial scenarios. Aerospace, 11(1):56.

[24]DongW, WenQQ, XiaQL, et al., 2020. Multiple-constraint cooperative guidance based on two-stage sequential convex programming. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 33(1):296-307.

[25]DongW, WangCY, WangJN, et al., 2022. Fixed-time terminal angle-constrained cooperative guidance law against maneuvering target. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 58(2):1352-1366.

[26]DongW, DengF, WangCY, et al., 2023. Three-dimensional spatial‍–‍temporal cooperative guidance without active speed control. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 46(10):1981-1996.

[27]DuW, DingSF, 2021. A survey on multi-agent deep reinforcement learning: from the perspective of challenges and applications. Artificial Intelligence Review, 54(5):‍3215-3238.

[28]DuanL, LiuC, XuH, et al., 2022. Susceptibility assessment of flash floods: a bibliometrics analysis and review. Remote Sensing, 14(21):5432.

[29]DuoW, ZhouMC, AbusorrahA, 2022. A survey of cyber attacks on cyber physical systems: recent advances and challenges. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, 9(5):784-800.

[30]ErerKS, TekinR, 2016. Impact time and angle control based on constrained optimal solutions. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 39(10):2448-2454.

[31]FlierlG, GrünbaumD, LevinS, et al., 1999. From individuals to aggregations: the interplay between behavior and physics. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 196(4):397-454.

[32]GarnierS, GautraisJ, TheraulazG, 2007. The biological principles of swarm intelligence. Swarm Intelligence, 1(1):‍3-31.

[33]GoldstoneRL, GureckisTM, 2009. Collective behavior. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1(3):412-438.

[34]GroblerMM, RobertsonJ, 2012. The future of command and control: determining force readiness at the push of a button. Journal of Information Warfare, 11(2):12-23.

[35]GrohJL, 2008. Network-centric warfare: leveraging the power of information. US Army War College Guide to National Security Issues, 1:323-338.

[36]GuK, WangYL, ShenY, 2020. Cooperative detection by multi-agent networks in the presence of position uncertainty. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 68:5411-5426.

[37]GuP, HuaCQ, XuWC, et al., 2020. Control channel anti-jamming in vehicular networks via cooperative relay beamforming. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 7(6):‍5064-5077.

[38]GuoJ, ZhouJ, ZhaoB, 2020. Three-dimensional integrated guidance and control for strap-down missiles considering seeker’s field-of-view angle constraint. Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control, 42(6):‍1097-1109.

[39]GutmanS, 2017. Impact-time vector guidance. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 40(8):2110-2114.

[40]HanT, HuQL, XinM, 2022. Three-dimensional approach angle guidance under varying velocity and field-of-view limit without using line-of-sight rate. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 52(11):‍7148-7159.

[41]HarlN, BalakrishnanSN, 2012. Impact time and angle guidance with sliding mode control. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 20(6):1436-1449.

[42]HeSM, WangW, LinDF, et al., 2018a. Consensus-based two-stage salvo attack guidance. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 54(3):1555-1566.

[43]HeSM, KimM, SongT, et al., 2018b. Three-dimensional salvo attack guidance considering communication delay. Aerospace Science and Technology, 73:1-9.

[44]HeY, WangYH, YuFR, et al., 2022. Efficient resource allocation for multi-beam satellite-terrestrial vehicular networks: a multi-agent actor-critic method with attention mechanism. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 23(3):2727-2738.

[45]HocaoğluMF, 2019. Weapon target assignment optimization for land based multi-air defense systems: a goal programming approach. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 128:681-689.

[46]HorowitzMC, KahnL, MahoneyC, 2020. The future of military applications of artificial intelligence: a role for confidence-building measures? Orbis, 64(4):528-543.

[47]HouDL, WangQ, SunXJ, et al., 2015. Finite-time cooperative guidance laws for multiple missiles with acceleration saturation constraints. IET Control Theory & Applications, 9(10):1525-1535.

[48]HouZW, LanXJ, ChenHB, et al., 2023. Finite-time cooperative guidance law for multiple missiles with impact angle constraints and switching communication topologies. Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems, 108(4):85.

[49]HuQL, HanT, XinM, 2019. Sliding-mode impact time guidance law design for various target motions. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 42(1):136-148.

[50]HuY, ChenMZ, SaadW, et al., 2021. Distributed multi-agent meta learning for trajectory design in wireless drone networks. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 39(10):3177-3192.

[51]JeonIS, LeeJI, TahkMJ, 2006. Impact-time-control guidance law for anti-ship missiles. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 14(2):260-266.

[52]JeonIS, LeeJI, TahkMJ, 2010. Homing guidance law for cooperative attack of multiple missiles. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 33(1):275-280.

[53]JhaB, TsalikR, WeissM, et al., 2019. Cooperative guidance and collision avoidance for multiple pursuers. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 42(7):1506-1518.

[54]JiangH, AnZ, YuYN, et al., 2018. Cooperative guidance with multiple constraints using convex optimization. Aerospace Science and Technology, 79:426-440.

[55]JiangZJ, YangXX, WangC, et al., 2024. Multi-UAV DMPC cooperative guidance with constraints of terminal angle and obstacle avoidance. International Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 2024:6912247.

[56]JinXZ, ErMJ, 2022. Cooperative path planning with priority target assignment and collision avoidance guidance for rescue unmanned surface vehicles in a complex ocean environment. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 52:101517.

[57]KangHL, WangPY, SongSM, 2023a. A generalized three-dimensional cooperative guidance law for various communication topologies with field-of-view constraint. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 237(10):‍2353-2369.

[58]KangHL, WangPY, WeiSH, et al., 2023b. Three-dimensional impact-time-constrained proportional navigation guidance using range-varying gain. Aerospace Science and Technology, 140:108419.

[59]KangHL, WangPY, LeeCH, et al., 2024. Impact time and angle guidance considering aerodynamic drag. Journal of the Franklin Institute, 361(6):106735.

[60]KatagiriN, 2023. Artificial intelligence and cross-domain warfare: balance of power and unintended escalation. Global Society, 38(1):34-48.

[61]KimHG, ChoD, KimHJ, 2019. Sliding mode guidance law for impact time control without explicit time-to-go estimation. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 55(1):236-250.

[62]KoD, ZuazuaE, 2020. Asymptotic behavior and control of a “guidance by repulsion” model. Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences, 30(4):765-804.

[63]KumarSR, GhoseD, 2015. Impact time guidance for large heading errors using sliding mode control. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 51(4):‍3123-3138.

[64]KumarSR, MukherjeeD, 2020. Cooperative salvo guidance using finite-time consensus over directed cycles. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 56(2):1504-1514.

[65]LanXJ, ChenJD, ZhaoZJ, et al., 2024. Cooperative guidance of multiple missiles: a hybrid coevolutionary approach. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 32(1):128-142.

[66]LeeCH, KimTH, TahkMJ, et al., 2013. Polynomial guidance laws considering terminal impact angle and acceleration constraints. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 49(1):74-92.

[67]LeeJI, JeonIS, TahkMJ, 2007. Guidance law to control impact time and angle. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 43(1):301-310.

[68]LiGF, WuYJ, 2023. Adaptive cooperative guidance with seeker-less followers: a position coordination-based framework. ISA Transactions, 143:168-176.

[69]LiGF, ZuoZY, 2023. Robust leader‍–‍follower cooperative guidance under false-data injection attacks. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 59(4):‍4511-4524.

[70]LiGF, LiQ, WuYJ, et al., 2020. Leader-following cooperative guidance law with specified impact time. Science China Technological Sciences, 63(11):2349-2356.

[71]LiGF, LüJH, ZhuGL, et al., 2021a. Distributed observer-based cooperative guidance with appointed impact time and collision avoidance. Journal of the Franklin Institute, 358(14):6976-6993.

[72]LiGF, WuYJ, XuPY, 2021b. Fixed-time cooperative guidance law with input delay for simultaneous arrival. International Journal of Control, 94(6):1664-1673.

[73]LiHJ, LiuYH, LiKB, et al., 2024. Analytical prescribed performance guidance with field-of-view and impact-angle constraints. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 47(4):728-741.

[74]LiJC, YuDX, MaWH, et al., 2024. Cooperative control of air–ground swarms under DoS attacks via cloud‍–‍fog computing. IEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering, 11(5):4278-4292.

[75]LiJD, SunT, HuangXP, et al., 2022. A memetic path planning algorithm for unmanned air/ground vehicle cooperative detection systems. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, 19(4):2724-2737.

[76]LiY, DuQ, ZhangJS, et al., 2023. Visualizing the intellectual landscape and evolution of transportation system resilience: a bibliometric analysis in CiteSpace. Developments in the Built Environment, 14:100149.

[77]LiZ, GuoJ, TangS, et al., 2023. A deep learning-based approach to time-coordination entry guidance for multiple hypersonic vehicles. The Aeronautical Journal, 127(1310):604-626.

[78]LiuF, DongXW, LiQD, et al., 2022. Cooperative differential games guidance laws for multiple attackers against an active defense target. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 35(5):374-389.

[79]LiuSX, YanBB, LiuRF, et al., 2022a. Cooperative guidance law for intercepting a hypersonic target with impact angle constraint. The Aeronautical Journal, 126(1300):1026-1044.

[80]LiuSX, YanBB, ZhangT, et al., 2022b. Coverage-based cooperative guidance law for intercepting hypersonic vehicles with overload constraint. Aerospace Science and Technology, 126:107651.

[81]LiuSX, YanBB, HuangW, et al., 2023. Current status and prospects of terminal guidance laws for intercepting hypersonic vehicles in near space: a review. Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE A (Applied Physics & Engineering), 24(5):387-403.

[82]LivermoreR, TsalikR, ShimaT, 2018. Elliptic guidance. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 41(11):2435-2444.

[83]LuKF, XiaYQ, 2013. Adaptive attitude tracking control for rigid spacecraft with finite-time convergence. Automatica, 49(12):3591-3599.

[84]LuP, 2021. What is guidance? Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 44(7):1237-1238.

[85]LuY, 2017. Cyber physical system (CPS)-based Industry 4.0: a survey. Journal of Industrial Integration and Management, 2(3):1750014.

[86]MaWH, LiangXG, FangYW, et al., 2021. Three-dimensional prescribed-time pinning group cooperative guidance law. International Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 2021:4490211.

[87]MaWH, FuWX, FangYW, et al., 2023a. Prescribed-time cooperative guidance with time delay. The Aeronautical Journal, 127(1311):852-875.

[88]MaWH, FangYW, FuWX, et al., 2023b. Three-dimensional prescribed-time impulsive pinning cooperative guidance. International Journal of Aeronautical and Space Sciences, 24(5):1375-1388.

[89]MagnusonS, 2018. DARPA pushes ‘mosaic warfare’ concept. National Defense, 103(780):18-19.

[90]MaoWW, PangT, GuoZR, et al., 2024. Analysis of the research progress of electromagnetic railgun based on CiteSpace. IEEE Access, 12:3499-3513.

[91]MeiJ, RenW, MaGF, 2013. Distributed coordination for second-order multi-agent systems with nonlinear dynamics using only relative position measurements. Automatica, 49(5):1419-1427.

[92]MukherjeeD, KumarSR, 2022. Finite-time heterogeneous cyclic pursuit with application to cooperative target interception. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, 52(11):‍11951-11962.

[93]NanavatiR, KumarSR, MaityA, 2021. Cooperative target capture using relative separation for three-dimensional engagement. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 57(5):3357-3367.

[94]NasrollahiS, 2023. A constrained cooperative guidance algorithm based on gray wolf optimization against highly maneuvering target. Applied Soft Computing, 144:110476.

[95]NingBD, HanQL, ZuoZY, 2019. Practical fixed-time consensus for integrator-type multi-agent systems: a time base generator approach. Automatica, 105:406-414.

[96]NingBD, HanQL, ZuoZY, et al., 2023. Fixed-time and prescribed-time consensus control of multiagent systems and its applications: a survey of recent trends and methodologies. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 19(2):1121-1135.

[97]Olfati-SaberR, MurrayRM, 2004. Consensus problems in networks of agents with switching topology and time-delays. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 49(9):1520-1533.

[98]ParkSH, JooS, LeeIG, 2022. Secure visible light communication system via cooperative attack detecting techniques. IEEE Access, 10:20473-20485.

[99]QiD, ZhangJQ, LiangXL, et al., 2021. Autonomous reconnaissance and attack test of UAV swarm based on mosaic warfare thought. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Robotics and Automation Engineering, p.79-83.

[100]RenW, CaoYC, 2010. Distributed Coordination of Multi-Agent Networks: Emergent Problems, Models, and Issues. Springer, London, UK.

[101]RheeSH, KimHS, SohnSW, 2012. The effect of decentralized resource allocation in network-centric warfare. Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Network, p.478-481.

[102]ShalumovV, ShimaT, 2017. Weapon‍–‍target-allocation strategies in multiagent target‍–‍missile‍–‍defender engagement. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 40(10):2452-2464.

[103]ShinHS, TsourdosA, LiKB, 2017. A new three-dimensional sliding mode guidance law variation with finite time convergence. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 53(5):2221-2232.

[104]SimplícioP, MarcosA, JoffreE, et al., 2018. Review of guidance techniques for landing on small bodies. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 103:69-83.

[105]SinhaA, KumarSR, 2020. Supertwisting control-based cooperative salvo guidance using leader‍–‍follower approach. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 56(5):3556-3565.

[106]SinhaA, KumarSR, MukherjeeD, 2021. Three-dimensional nonlinear cooperative salvo using event-triggered strategy. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 44(2):328-342.

[107]SinhaA, KumarSR, MukherjeeD, 2022. Cooperative integrated guidance and control design for simultaneous interception. Aerospace Science and Technology, 120:107262.

[108]SoodSK, RawatKS, SharmaG, 2024. 3-D printing technologies from infancy to recent times: a scientometric review. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 71:‍671-687.

[109]SuWS, ShinHS, ChenL, et al., 2018. Cooperative interception strategy for multiple inferior missiles against one highly maneuvering target. Aerospace Science and Technology, 80:91-100.

[110]SuWS, LiKB, ChenL, 2019. Coverage-based three-dimensional cooperative guidance strategy against highly maneuvering target. Aerospace Science and Technology, 85:‍556-566.

[111]SumpterDJT, 2006. The principles of collective animal behaviour. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 361(1465):5-22.

[112]SunZY, YangJY, 2022. Multi-missile interception for multi-targets: dynamic situation assessment, target allocation and cooperative interception in groups. Journal of the Franklin Institute, 359(12):5991-6022.

[113]SzabadföldiI, 2021. Artificial intelligence in military application‍–‍opportunities and challenges. Land Forces Academy Review, 26(2):157-165.

[114]SzpytkoJ, Salgado DuarteY, 2021. A digital twins concept model for integrated maintenance: a case study for crane operation. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 32(7):1863-1881.

[115]TanMH, ShenH, 2024. Three-dimensional cooperative game guidance law for a leader‍–‍follower system with impact angles constraint. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 60(1):405-420.

[116]TekinR, ErerKS, 2020. Impact time and angle control against moving targets with look angle shaping. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 43(5):1020-1025.

[117]TsalikR, ShimaT, 2019. Circular impact-time guidance. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 42(8):‍‍1836-1847.

[118]WangCC, WuA, HouYQ, et al., 2023. Optimal deployment of swarm positions in cooperative interception of multiple UAV swarms. Digital Communications and Networks, 9(2):567-579.

[119]WangCY, DongW, WangJN, et al., 2021. Guidance law design with fixed-time convergent error dynamics. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 44(7):1389-1398.

[120]WangCY, DongW, WangJN, et al., 2022. Impact-angle-constrained cooperative guidance for salvo attack. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 45(4):684-703.

[121]WangHB, YouB, WangP, et al., 2024. Balanced prescribed-distance guidance with impact angle constraint and input saturation. Journal of the Franklin Institute, 361(4):106640.

[122]WangL, XiaoF, 2010. Finite-time consensus problems for networks of dynamic agents. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 55(4):950-955.

[123]WangPY, GuoYN, MaGF, et al., 2022. New look-angle tracking guidance strategy for impact time and angle control. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 45(3):‍545-557.

[124]WangPY, LeeCH, LiuYH, et al., 2024. Nonlinear three-dimensional guidance for impact time and angle control with field-of-view constraint. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 60(1):264-279.

[125]WangSB, GuoY, WangSC, et al., 2021. Cooperative interception with fast multiple model adaptive estimation. Defence Technology, 17(6):1905-1917.

[126]WangWF, LiuH, LinWQ, et al., 2020. Investigation on works and military applications of artificial intelligence. IEEE Access, 8:131614-131625.

[127]WangXF, ZhengYY, LinH, 2015. Integrated guidance and control law for cooperative attack of multiple missiles. Aerospace Science and Technology, 42:1-11.

[128]WangXL, ZhangYA, WuHL, 2015. Distributed cooperative guidance of multiple anti-ship missiles with arbitrary impact angle constraint. Aerospace Science and Technology, 46:299-311.

[129]WangXM, WangJL, XuYH, et al., 2020. Dynamic spectrum anti-jamming communications: challenges and opportunities. IEEE Communications Magazine, 58(2):79-85.

[130]WangYH, WangJ, FanSP, 2023. Parameter identification of a PN-guided incoming missile using an improved multiple-model mechanism. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 59(5):5888-5899.

[131]WangYJ, SongYD, HillDJ, et al., 2019. Prescribed-time consensus and containment control of networked multiagent systems. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, 49(4):1138-1147.

[132]WangYN, MushtaqRT, AhmedA, et al., 2022. Additive manufacturing is sustainable technology: CiteSpace based bibliometric investigations of fused deposition modeling approach. Rapid Prototyping Journal, 28(4):654-675.

[133]WangYY, YuanJQ, ChiQX, et al., 2020. Research status and application of the cooperative guidance technology for aerial vehicle swarm systems based on spatiotemporal coordination. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Unmanned Systems, p.369-374.

[134]WangZK, FuWX, FangYW, et al., 2022. Prescribed-time cooperative guidance law against maneuvering target based on leader-following strategy. ISA Transactions, 129:257-270.

[135]WeislerW, StewartW, AndersonMB, et al., 2018. Testing and characterization of a fixed wing cross-domain unmanned vehicle operating in aerial and underwater environments. IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, 43(4):969-982.

[136]WuZH, RenQB, LuoZQ, et al., 2021. Cooperative midcourse guidance law with communication delay. International Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 2021:3460389.

[137]WuZH, DongXW, LiQD, et al., 2024. Prescribed-time guidance law with approach angle constraint and actuator faults. Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 37(1):04023107.

[138]XiaoW, YuJL, DongXW, et al., 2020. Cooperative interception against highly maneuvering target with acceleration constraints. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 41(S1):184-194 (in Chinese).

[139]XiaoWJ, LiM, AlzahraniB, et al., 2021. A blockchain-based secure crowd monitoring system using UAV swarm. IEEE Network, 35(1):108-115.

[140]XuLG, LiL, HuTY, et al., 2023. The multi-missile heterogeneous networked collaborative guidance method under communication delay conditions. Proceedings of the 16th UK-Europe-China Workshop on Millimetre Waves and Terahertz Technologies, p.1-3.

[141]XuQQ, GeJQ, YangT, 2020. Multiple missiles cooperative guidance based on proportional navigation guidance. Proceedings of the Chinese Control and Decision Conference, p.4423-4430.

[142]XuSQ, CaiMJ, WangBF, 2024. Research on adaptive practical prescribed-time consensus of multiple mechanical systems with full-state constraints. Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control, 46(15):2897-2908.

[143]XuSY, SongX, LiCY, 2024. Cooperative guidance law with maneuverability awareness: a decentralized solution. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 37(7):450-457.

[144]YanPP, FanYH, LiuRF, et al., 2020. Distributed target-encirclement guidance law for cooperative attack of multiple missiles. International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems, 17(3):1729881420929140.

[145]YanXH, KuangMC, ZhuJH, et al., 2020. Reachability-based cooperative strategy for intercepting a highly maneuvering target using inferior missiles. Aerospace Science and Technology, 106:106057.

[146]YangG, FangY, MaW, et al., 2024. Cooperative trajectory shaping guidance law for multiple anti-ship missiles. The Aeronautical Journal, 128(1319):73-91.

[147]YangJQ, DuJ, 2020. Development of intelligent command and control under the operational concept of “mosaic warfare”. Proceedings of the International Conference on Robots & Intelligent System, p.13-15.

[148]YangJY, ZhouJL, WeiXQ, 2017. Key technologies of distributed cooperative guidance and control method for multiple missiles attacking the maneuvering target. Aero Weaponry, (3):3-12 (in Chinese).

[149]YangXY, SongSM, 2021. Three-dimensional consensus algorithm for nonsingular distributed cooperative guidance strategy. Aerospace Science and Technology, 118:106958.

[150]YiS, SheXY, GuoD, et al., 2021. Distributed multi-munition cooperative guidance based on clock synchronization for switching and noisy networks. The Journal of Supercomputing, 77(1):212-243.

[151]YongE, 2014. Autonomous drones flock like birds. Nature, 9.

[152]YouH, ZhaoFJ, 2020. Distributed synergetic guidance law for multiple missiles with angle-of-attack constraint. The Aeronautical Journal, 124(1274):533-548.

[153]YouH, ChangXL, ZhaoJF, et al., 2023. Three-dimensional impact-angle-constrained fixed-time cooperative guidance algorithm with adjustable impact time. Aerospace Science and Technology, 141:108574.

[154]YuDX, LiJC, WangZ, et al., 2024. An overview of swarm coordinated control. IEEE Transactions on Artificial Intelligence, 5(5):918-1938.

[155]YuH, DaiKR, LiHJ, et al., 2021. Distributed cooperative guidance law for multiple missiles with input delay and topology switching. Journal of the Franklin Institute, 358(17):9061-9085.

[156]YuJL, DongXW, LiQD, et al., 2019. Cooperative integrated practical time-varying formation tracking and control for multiple missiles system. Aerospace Science and Technology, 93:105300.

[157]YuJL, DongXW, LiQD, et al., 2022. Task coupling based layered cooperative guidance: theories and applications. Control Engineering Practice, 121:105050.

[158]YuJL, ShiZX, DongXW, et al., 2023. Impact time consensus cooperative guidance against the maneuvering target: theory and experiment. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 59(4):4590-4603.

[159]YuanL, FengZS, ZhangC, et al., 2023. Cross-platform UAV swarm key management in denied environments. Applied Sciences, 13(15):8918.

[160]ZarchanP, 2012. Tactical and Strategic Missile Guidance. 6th Edition. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc., Reston, USA.

[161]ZhanY, LiSY, ZhouD, 2024. Time-to-go based three-dimensional multi-missile spatio-temporal cooperative guidance law: a novel approach for maneuvering target interception. ISA Transactions, 149:178-195.

[162]ZhangBL, ZhouD, LiJL, et al., 2022. Coverage-based cooperative guidance strategy by controlling flight path angle. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 45(5):‍972-981.

[163]ZhangL, LiDY, JingL, et al., 2023. Appointed-time cooperative guidance law with line-of-sight angle constraint and time-to-go control. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 59(3):3142-3155.

[164]ZhangS, GuoY, LiuZG, et al., 2021. Finite-time cooperative guidance strategy for impact angle and time control. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 57(2):806-819.

[165]ZhangWQ, ChenWC, LiJL, et al., 2022. Guidance algorithm for impact time, angle, and acceleration control under varying velocity condition. Aerospace Science and Technology, 123:107462.

[166]ZhangXL, XuT, DuanZS, et al., 2024. Multi-objective complementary control and its application to cooperative circular guidance. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems II: Express Briefs, 71(6):3161-3165.

[167]ZhangY, TangSJ, GuoJ, 2018. An adaptive fast fixed-time guidance law with an impact angle constraint for intercepting maneuvering targets. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 31(6):1327-1344.

[168]ZhangY, TangSJ, GuoJ, 2020. Two-stage cooperative guidance strategy using a prescribed-time optimal consensus method. Aerospace Science and Technology, 100:105641.

[169]ZhangYA, MaGX, LiuAL, 2013. Guidance law with impact time and impact angle constraints. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 26(4):960-966.

[170]ZhangYL, XuHY, XuYT, et al., 2018. A multi-leader one-follower Stackelberg game approach for cooperative anti-jamming: no pains, no gains. IEEE Communications Letters, 22(8):1680-1683.

[171]ZhangZ, DongXW, YvJL, et al., 2024. Distributed cooperative tracking and cooperative guidance against maneuvering aerial target. Aerospace Science and Technology, 144:108827.

[172]ZhaoJ, ZhouR, 2015. Unified approach to cooperative guidance laws against stationary and maneuvering targets. Nonlinear Dynamics, 81(4):1635-1647.

[173]ZhaoJB, YangSX, 2017. Review of multi-missile cooperative guidance. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 38(1):17-29 (in Chinese).

[174]ZhaoJB, YangSX, 2018. Integrated cooperative guidance framework and cooperative guidance law for multi-missile. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 31(3):546-555.

[175]ZhaoQL, DongXW, ChenJ, et al., 2015. Coordinated guidance strategy for heterogeneous missiles intercepting hypersonic weapon. Proceedings of the 34th Chinese Control Conference, p.5170-5175.

[176]ZhaoSY, ZhouR, 2008a. Cooperative guidance for multimissile salvo attack. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 21(6):533-539.

[177]ZhaoSY, ZhouR, 2008b. Multi-missile cooperative guidance using coordination variables. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 29(6):1605-1611 (in Chinese).

[178]ZhaoWF, TengKN, ChenJ, et al., 2024. Research on operational effectiveness of air and missile defence in maritime stronghold based on queuing theory. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology, 24(2):200-212.

[179]ZhouJL, YangJY, 2016. Distributed guidance law design for cooperative simultaneous attacks with multiple missiles. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 39(10):2439-2447.

[180]ZhouJL, WuXJ, LvYZ, et al., 2022. Recent progress on the study of multi-vehicle coordination in cooperative attack and defense: an overview. Asian Journal of Control, 24(2):794-809.

[181]ZhouWH, LiJ, LiuZH, et al., 2022. Improving multi-target cooperative tracking guidance for UAV swarms using multi-agent reinforcement learning. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 35(7):100-112.

[182]ZhuGL, ZhangD, LiuKX, et al., 2024. Three-dimensional cooperative guidance for simultaneous attack with specified impact time based on fixed-time convergence. Asian Journal of Control, 26(5):2261-2277.

[183]ZhuJW, SuDL, XieY, et al., 2019. Impact time and angle control guidance independent of time-to-go prediction. Aerospace Science and Technology, 86:818-825.

[184]ZhuangS, HeY, YuFR, et al., 2022. When multi-access edge computing meets multi-area intelligent reflecting surface: a multi-agent reinforcement learning approach. Proceedings of the IEEE/ACM 30th International Symposium on Quality of Service, p.1-10.

[185]ZuoZY, TieL, 2014. A new class of finite-time nonlinear consensus protocols for multi-agent systems. International Journal of Control, 87(2):363-370.