Abstract: Objective: To investigate the relationship between growth patterns and mandibular posterior tooth-alveolar bone complex morphology in a Chinese population with normal occlusion. Methods: Forty-five patients with normal occlusion (23 males, 22 females) were included in this study. Among these patients, 20 displayed the vertical growth pattern, and 20 had the horizontal growth pattern, while the remaining patients displayed the average growth pattern. All of the patients underwent dental cone beam computed tomography (CBCT), which included the region of the mandibular posterior teeth and the alveolar. A linear regression analysis and a correlation analysis between the facial height index (FHI) and the alveolar bone morphology were performed. Results: The inclination of the molars, the thickness of the cortical bone, and the height of the mandibular bone differed significantly between patients with the horizontal growth pattern and those with the vertical growth pattern (P<0.05). Significant positive correlations were found between: the FHI and the inclination of the molars; the FHI and the thickness of the cortical bone; and the FHI and the height of the mandibular bone. Conclusions: The mandibular posterior tooth-alveolar bone complex morphology may be affected by growth patterns.

[1]Aasen, T.O., Espeland, L., 2005. An approach to maintain orthodontic alignment of lower incisors without the use of retainers. Eur. J. Orthod., 27(3):209-214.

[2]Brown, D.C., 2006. Cross-sectional Mandibular Morphology in High, Average, and Low Angle Subjects. University of California, San Francisco, USA, p.126-127.

[3]Dechow, P.C., Hylander, W.L., 2000. Elastic properties and masticatory bone stress in the macaque mandible. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol., 112(4):553-574.

[4]Guo, Q.Y., Zhang, S.J., Liu, H., Wang, C.L., Wei, F.L., Lv, T., Wang, N.N., Liu, D.X., 2011. Three-dimensional evaluation of upper anterior alveolar bone dehiscence after incisor retraction and intrusion in adult patients with bimaxillary protrusion malocclusion. J. Zhejiang Univ.-Sci. B (Biomed. & Biotechnol.), 12(12):990-997.

[5]Ingervall, B., Thilander, B., 1974. Relation between facial morphology and activity of masticatory muscles. J. Oral Rehabil., 1(2):131-147.

[6]Ingervall, B., Helkimo, E., 1978. Masticatory muscle force and facial morphology in man. Arch. Oral Biol., 23(3) :203-206.

[7]Janson, G., Bombonatti, R., Cruz, K.S., Hassunuma, C.Y., Del Santo, M.J., 2004. Buccolingual inclinations of posterior teeth in subjects with different facial patterns. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop., 125(3):316-322.

[8]Kasai, K., Kawamura, A., Kanazawa, E., 1999. A comparative study of dental arches and mandibular bases in Jomon and modern Japanese using CT scanning. Orthodontic Waves, 58(1):193-198.

[9]Kawamura, A., 1999. Relationship between buccolingual inclination of mandibular molars and dentofacial morphology. Nihon Univ. J. Oral Sci., 25(3):339-349.

[10]Kiliaridis, S., Johansson, A., Haraldson, T., Omar, R., Carlsson, G.E., 1995. Craniofacial morphology, occlusal traits, and bite force in persons with advanced occlusal tooth wear. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop., 107(3):286-292.

[11]Liang, X., Jacobs, R., Lambrichts, I., 2006. An assessment on spiral CT scan of the superior and inferior genial spinal foramina and canals. Surg. Radiol. Anat., 28(1):98-104.

[12]Lin, L., 1989. A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility. Biometrics, 45(1):255-268.

[13]Ludlow, J.B., Ivanovic, M., 2008. Comparative dosimetry of dental CBCT devices and 64-slice CT for oral and maxillofacial radiology. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endod., 106(1):106-114.

[14]Ludlow, J.B., Davies-Ludlow, L.E., Brooks, S.L., Howerton, W.B., 2006. Dosimetry of 3 CBCT devices for oral and maxillofacial radiology: CB Mercuray, NewTom 3G and i-CAT. Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., 35(4):219-226.

[15]Masumoto, T., Hayashi, I., Kawamura, A., Tanaka, K., Kasai, K., 2001. Relationships among facial type, buccolingual molar inclination, and cortical bone thickness of the mandible. Eur. J. Orthod., 23(1):15-23.

[16]Miyawaki, S., Koyama, I., Inoue, M., Mishima, K., Sugahara, T., Yamamoto, T., 2003. Factors associated with the stability of titanium screws placed in the posterior region for orthodontic anchorage. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop., 124(4):373-378.

[17]Motoyoshi, M., Hirabayshi, M., Shimazaki, T., Namra, S., 2002. An experimental study on mandibular expansion: increases in arch width and perimeter. Eur. J. Orthod., 24(2):125-130.

[18]Park, H.S., Jeong, S.H., Kwon, O.W., 2006. Factors affecting the clinical success of screw implants used as orthodontic anchorage. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop., 130(1) :18-25.

[19]Pohlenz, P., Blessmann, M., Blake, F., Gbara, A., Schmelzle, R., Heiland, M., 2008. Major mandibular surgical procedures as an indication for intraoperative imaging. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg., 66(2):324-329.

[20]Swasty, D., Lee, J., Huang, J.C., Maki, K., Gansky, S.A., Hatcher, D., Millerg, A.J., 2011. Cross-sectional human mandibular morphology as assessed in vivo by cone-beam computed tomography in patients with different vertical facial dimensions. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop., 139(4):e377-e389.

[21]Tabe, T., 1976. The correlation between the activities in the masseter muscle and the biting force, and the morphology of the orofacial skeleton. J. Jpn. Orthod. Soc., 35(4) :255-265.

[22]Utsuno, H., Kageyama, T., Uchida, K., Yoshino, M., Miyazawa, H., 2010. Facial soft tissue thickness in Japanese children. Forensic Sci. Int., 199(1-3):109.e1-109.e6.

[23]Wang, R.Y., Han, M., Liu, H., Wang, C.L., Xian, H.H., Zhang, L., Zhang, S.J., Liu, D.X., 2012. Establishment of reference mandibular plane for anterior alveolar morphology evaluation using cone beam computed tomography. J. Zhejiang Univ.-Sci. B (Biomed. & Biotechnol.), 13(11) :942-947.