Abstract: Orchids are highly valued ornamental plants whose growth conditions directly impact the economic returns of the horticultural industry. The substrate, acting both as a physical support and a nutrient reservoir, is critical for orchid development. Therefore, the careful selection of an appropriate growth substrate is of paramount importance. However, existing research on the relationship between orchid growth and substrate properties relies mainly on manual measurements of physiological indicators, with limited application of high-throughput phenotyping (HTP) platforms. In this study, we evaluated three distinct substrate types, peat soil mixed with perlite, pine bark, and river sand, which were applied to two orchid species, Cymbidium goeringii and Cymbidium faberi. Using the high-throughput Plantarray lysimetric system, we continuously recorded environmental parameters (photosynthetically active radiation, humidity, and temperature) as well as key growth metrics (biomass accumulation, canopy conductance, and transpiration rate). This platform enabled precise and rapid quantification of orchid growth indicators. The results show that the type of substrate significantly affects orchid growth. Under controlled conditions, mixed substrates that provide balanced nutrition and excellent drainage enhanced orchid growth compared to other substrates. Additionally, when the data obtained from the HTP platform were compared with those from traditional manual measurements, the automated system showed higher reliability and accuracy. This study not only provides practical guidance for selecting cultivation substrates for orchids, but also establishes a robust scientific framework for integrating advanced phenotyping technologies into orchid cultivation practices.

基于高通量表型组平台的优化基质选择以促进兰花生长

[1]AllohverdiT, MohantyAK, RoyP, et al., 2021. A review on current status of biochar uses in agriculture. Molecules, 26(18):5584.

[2]BălăiţăC, AmbăruşS, BrezeanuPM, et al., 2024. Preliminary studies on the influence of different substrates on the cultivation of peppers (Capsicum annuum L.). Sci Pap Ser B Hortic, LXVIII(2):381-392.

[3]BlokC, EveleensB, van WinkelA, 2021. Growing media for food and quality of life in the period 2020‒2050. Acta Hortic, 1305:341-356.

[4]BrownSG, KlettJE, 2020. Impacts of growth substrate and container size on cutting production from ‘snow angel’ coral bells stock plants. HortTechnology, 30(2):185-192.

[5]ChenDJ, NeumannK, FriedelS, et al., 2014. Dissecting the phenotypic components of crop plant growth and drought responses based on high-throughput image analysis. Plant Cell, 26(12):4636-4655.

[6]ColladoCE, HwangSJ, HernándezR, 2024. Supplemental greenhouse lighting increased the water use efficiency, crop growth, and cutting production in Cannabis sativa. Front Plant Sci, 15:1371702.

[7]ConradK, HansenHCB, 2007. Sorption of zinc and lead on coir. Bioresour Technol, 98(1):89-97.

[8]CriscioneKS, FieldsJS, OwenJS, et al., 2022. Evaluating stratified substrates effect on containerized crop growth under varied irrigation strategies. HortScience, 57(3):400-413.

[9]DriesenE, de ProftMP, LauwersA, et al., 2021. Effect of substrate temperature on plant growth and transpiration rates, determined by means of soil moisture sensors. Acta Hortic, 1327:111-120.

[10]EndersTA, St. Dennis S, Oakland J, et al., 2019. Classifying cold-stress responses of inbred maize seedlings using RGB imaging. Plant Direct, 3(1):e00104.

[11]FangPP, SunT, PandeyAK, et al., 2023. Understanding water conservation vs. profligation traits in vegetable legumes through a physio-transcriptomic-functional approach. Hortic Res, 10(3):uhac287.

[12]GriffithsM, AtkinsonJA, GardinerLJ, et al., 2022. Identification of QTL and underlying genes for root system architecture associated with nitrate nutrition in hexaploid wheat. J Integr Agric, 21(4):917-932.

[13]Hajiaghaei KamraniM, Rahimi ChegeniA, HosseinniyaH, 2019. Effects of different growing media on yield and growth parameters of potato minitubers (Solanum tuberosum L.). Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal, 50(15):1838-1853.

[14]HalperinO, GebremedhinA, WallachR, et al., 2017. High-throughput physiological phenotyping and screening system for the characterization of plant–environment interactions. Plant J, 89(4):839-850.

[15]HaworthM, MarinoG, AtzoriG, et al., 2023. Plant physiological analysis to overcome limitations to plant phenotyping. Plants, 12(23):4015.

[16]Herrero-HuertaM, Rodriguez-GonzalvezP, RaineyKM, 2020. Yield prediction by machine learning from UAS-based multi-sensor data fusion in soybean. Plant Methods, 16:78.

[17]KeXB, YaoJ, JiangZH, et al., 2025. Recover and surpass: the mechanisms of plants transition upon rehydration from drought. Plant Stress, 15:100782.

[18]KimJK, ShawonMRA, AnJH, et al., 2021. Influence of substrate composition and container size on the growth of tissue culture propagated apple rootstock plants. Agronomy, 11(12):2450.

[19]KluteA, DirksenC, 1986. Hydraulic conductivity and diffusivity: laboratory methods. In: Klute A (Ed.), Methods of Soil Analysis: Part 1 Physical and Mineralogical Methods, 2nd Ed. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, p.687-734.

[20]KumariP, BhattA, MeenaVK, et al., 2025. Plant phenomics: the force behind tomorrow’s crop phenotyping tools. J Plant Growth Regul, 44(5):1791-1809.

[21]LawsonT, MillikenAL, 2023. Photosynthesis – beyond the leaf. New Phytol, 238(1):55-61.

[22]LazarevićB, ŠatovićZ, NimacA, et al., 2021. Application of phenotyping methods in detection of drought and salinity stress in basil (Ocimum basilicum L.). Front Plant Sci, 12:629441.

[23]LinLX, LianZF, SuMH, et al., 2007. Leaf area estimation of Cymbidium at seeding stage. Chin J Trop Crops, 28(3):15-18 (in Chinese).

[24]MaDC, YiB, TengWC, et al., 2024. Growth, physiological and N, P, K accumulation responses of Erythropalum scandens Bl. seedlings under different substrates. BMC Plant Biol, 24:972.

[25]MiraniAA, Abul-SoadAA, MarkhandGS, 2017. Effect of different substrates on survival and growth of transplanted orchids (Dendrobium nobile cv.) into net house. Int Scholars J Int, 5(4):310-317.

[26]MirzakhaninafchiH, ManiI, HasanM, et al., 2022. Development of prediction models for soil nitrogen management based on electrical conductivity and moisture content. Sensors, 22(18):6728.

[27]MupambwaHA, LukasheNS, MnkeniPNS, 2017. Suitability of fly ash vermicompost as a component of pine bark growing media: effects on media physicochemical properties and ornamental marigold (Tagetes spp.) growth and flowering. Compost Sci Util, 25(1):48-61.

[28]NguiME, LinYH, WeiIL, et al., 2024. Effects of the combination of biochar and organic fertilizer on soil properties and agronomic attributes of soybean (Glycine max L.). PLoS ONE, 19(9):e0310221.

[29]Ortiz-DelvastoN, García-IbáñezP, Olmos-RuizR, et al., 2023. Substrate composition affects growth and physiological parameters of blueberry. Sci Hortic, 308:111528.

[30]PieruschkaR, HuberG, BerryJA, 2010. Control of transpiration by radiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 107(30):13372-13377.

[31]SchaferG, LernerBL, 2022. Physical and chemical characteristics and analysis of plant substrate. Ornamental Hortic, 28(2):181-192.

[32]WangJ, HuangJF, WangXZ, et al., 2015. Estimation of rice phenology date using integrated HJ-1 CCD and Landsat-8 OLI vegetation indices time-series images. J Zhejiang Univ-Sci B (Biomed & Biotechnol), 16(10):832-844.

[33]WangF, FangY, WangLX, et al., 2022. Effects of residual monensin in livestock manure on nitrogen transformation and microbial community during “crop straw feeding-substrate fermentation-mushroom cultivation” recycling system. Waste Manage, 149:333-344.

[34]WangXY, LiuMJ, CiampittiIA, et al., 2024. Benefits and trade-offs of replacing inorganic fertilizer by organic substrate in crop production: a global meta-analysis. Sci Total Environ, 925:171781.

[35]WrightRD, 1986. The pour-through nutrient extraction procedure. HortScience, 21(2):227-229.

[36]WuW, FengXR, LuCZ, 2024. The rise of smart agriculture in China: current situation and suggestions for further development. Exp Agric, 60:e28.

[37]YangFJ, WangWQ, WuZW, et al., 2024. Fertilizer reduction and biochar amendment promote soil mineral-associated organic carbon, bacterial activity, and enzyme activity in a jasmine garden in southeast China. Sci Total Environ, 954:176300.

[38]YangFX, ZhuGF, WangZ, et al., 2017. MicroRNA transcriptome variations in the multi-tepal mutant provide insights into the floral patterning of the orchid Cymbidium goeringii. BMC Genomics, 18:367.

[39]ZhangMC, XieW, ZhongXJ, et al., 2024. The impact of combined application of biochar and fertilizer on the biochemical properties of soil in soybean fields. PeerJ, 12:e18172.

[40]ZhangSB, YangYJ, LiJW, et al., 2018. Physiological diversity of orchids. Plant Divers, 40(4):196-208.