Abstract: Reconstructing the shape and position of plasma is an important issue in Tokamaks. Equilibrium and fitting (EFIT) code is generally used for plasma boundary reconstruction in some Tokamaks. However, this magnetic method still has some inevitable disadvantages. In this paper, we present an optical plasma boundary reconstruction algorithm. This method uses EFIT reconstruction results as the standard to create the optimally optical reconstruction. Traditional edge detection methods cannot extract a clear plasma boundary for reconstruction. Based on global contrast, we propose an edge detection algorithm to extract the plasma boundary in the image plane. Illumination in this method is robust. The extracted boundary and the boundary reconstructed by EFIT are fitted by same-order polynomials and the transformation matrix exists. To acquire this matrix without camera calibration, the extracted plasma boundary is transformed from the image plane to the Tokamak poloidal plane by a mathematical model, which is optimally resolved by using least squares to minimize the error between the optically reconstructed result and the EFIT result. Once the transform matrix is acquired, we can optically reconstruct the plasma boundary with only an arbitrary image captured. The error between the method and EFIT is presented and the experimental results of different polynomial orders are discussed.

基于最小二乘法的EAST托卡马克光学等离子体边缘重建

[1]Ahn JW, Maingi R, Mastrovito D, et al., 2010. High speed infrared camera diagnostic for heat flux measurement in NSTX. Rev Sci Instrum, 81(2):023501.

[2]Alpers A, Gritzmann P, Moseev D, et al., 2015. 3D particle tracking velocimetry using dynamic discrete tomography. Comput Phys Commun, 187:130-136.

[3]Canny J, 1986. A computational approach to edge detection. IEEE Trans Patt Anal Mach Intell, 8(6):679-698.

[4]Davis WM, Patel RI, Boeglin WU, 2010. Advances in fast 2D camera data handling and analysis on NSTX. Fus Eng Des, 85(3):325-327.

[5]Hommen G, Baar MD, Nuij P, et al., 2010. Optical boundary reconstruction of tokamak plasmas for feedback control of plasma position and shape. Rev Sci Instrum, 81(11):113504.

[6]Hommen G, de Baar M, Citrin J, et al., 2013. A fast, magnetics-free flux surface estimation and $q$-profile reconstruction algorithm for feedback control of plasma profiles. Plasma Phys Contr Fus, 55(2):025007. http://stacks.iop.org/0741-3335/55/i=2/a=025007

[7]Hommen G, de Baar M, Duval BP, et al., 2014. Real-time optical plasma boundary reconstruction for plasma position control at the TCV Tokamak. Nucl Fus, 54(7):073018.

[8]Hussain S, Qayyum A, Ahmad Z, et al., 2016. Initial plasma formation in the GLAST-II spherical Tokamak. J Fus Energy, 35(3):529-537.

[9]Kumar D, Clayton DJ, Parman M, et al., 2012. Dual transmission grating based imaging radiometer for Tokamak edge and divertor plasmas. Rev Sci Instrum, 83(10):10E511.

[10]Martin V, Travere JM, Bremond F, et al., 2010. Thermal event recognition applied to protection of Tokamak plasma-facing components. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas, 59(5):1182-1191.

[11]Mitteau R, Spruytte J, Vallet S, et al., 2007. A possible method of carbon deposit mapping on plasma facing components using infrared thermography. J Nucl Mater, 363-365:206-210.

[12]Munsat T, Zweben SJ, 2006. Derivation of time-dependent two-dimensional velocity field maps for plasma turbulence studies. Rev Sci Instrum, 77(10):103501.

[13]Odstrcil M, Mlynár J, Weinzettl V, et al., 2013. Dust observation in the compass Tokamak using fast camera. 22^nd Annual Conf of Doctoral Students, p.73-79.

[14]Perek P, 2013. High-performance image processing system for plasma diagnostics. Int PhD Workshop OWD, p.328-331.

[15]Pironti A, Walker M, 2005. Fusion, Tokamaks, and plasma control: an introduction and tutorial. IEEE Contr Syst, 25(5):30-43.

[16]Qi P, Li Q, Luo GN, 2008. Application of infrared thermography in NDT of plasma-facing components for Tokamaks. 17^th World Conf on Non-destructive Testing, p.1-8.

[17]Xue E, Luo J, Shu S, et al., 2011. Plasma edge detection and tracking in the east superconducting Tokamak discharge. 3^rd Int Conf on Measuring Technology and Mechatronics Automation, p.865-868.

[18]Zhang Z, 2000. A flexible new technique for camera calibration. IEEE Trans Patt Anal Mach Intell, 22(11):1330-1334.

[19]Zhu Y, Xie J, Liu WD, et al., 2016. The general optics structure of millimeter-wave imaging diagnostic on Tokamak. J Instrum, 11(1):P01004.

[20]Zweben SJ, McChesney J, Gould RW, 2011. Optical imaging of edge turbulence in the Caltech Tokamak. Nucl Fus, 23(6):825-830.