CLC number: TP309
On-line Access: 2024-05-06
Received: 2022-10-25
Revision Accepted: 2024-05-06
Crosschecked: 2023-06-16
Cited: 0
Clicked: 302
Citations: Bibtex RefMan EndNote GB/T7714
Wenbo ZHANG, Tao WANG, Chaoyang ZHANG, Jingyu FENG. Securing multi-chain consensus against diverse miner behavior attacks in blockchain networks[J]. Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering,in press.https://doi.org/10.1631/FITEE.2200505 @article{title="Securing multi-chain consensus against diverse miner behavior attacks in blockchain networks", %0 Journal Article TY - JOUR
区块链网络中抗多样化矿工行为攻击的安全多链共识方案1西安邮电大学网络空间安全学院,中国西安市,710121 2中国邮政储蓄银行,中国西安市,710000 摘要:跨链技术的发展使得不同区块链间的互操作成为可能,多链共识在区块链网络中变得日益重要。然而,目前对单链共识方案的研究较多,涉及可信矿工的多链共识方案的探讨相对较少,这为恶意用户在不同链上发起多样化矿工行为(diverse miner behavior, DMB)攻击提供了机会。DMB攻击者可以在某些链(称为mask链)上表现友好并参与共识过程,以提升其信任值,而在其他链(称为kill链)上从事对网络具有破坏性的行为。本文提出一种名为Proof-of-DiscTrust(PoDT)的多链共识方案,旨在防范DMB攻击。该方案引入DiscTrust信任理念,用于评估每个用户在不同链上的信任值。用户的信任值被分为本地信任值和全局信任值。针对DMB攻击者通过在kill链上交替创建真实或虚假区块来维持其信任度的问题,设计了一种实施DiscTrust机制的动态行为预测方法。此外,针对多链环境,提出3个可信矿工选择算法,分别用于选择网络矿工、链矿工和链矿工领导者。实验结果表明,PoDT方案能够抵抗DMB攻击,并且在多链环境中比传统共识方案更为有效。 关键词组: Darkslateblue:Affiliate; Royal Blue:Author; Turquoise:Article
Reference[1]Alzahrani N, Bulusu N, 2018. Towards true decentralization: a blockchain consensus protocol based on game theory and randomness. Proc 9th Int Conf on Decision and Game Theory for Security, p.465-485. [2]Azaria A, Ekblaw A, Vieira T, et al., 2016. MedRec: using blockchain for medical data access and permission management. 2nd Int Conf on Open and Big Data, p.25-30. [3]Borkowski M, Sigwart M, Frauenthaler P, et al., 2019. Dextt: deterministic cross-blockchain token transfers. IEEE Access, 7:111030-111042. [4]Buchman E, 2016. Tendermint: Byzantine Fault Tolerance in the Age of Blockchains. PhD Thesis, The University of Guelph, Ontario, Canada. [5]Buterin V, 2022. Chain Interoperability. Available fromhttps://www.r3.com/reports/chain-interoperability [Accessed on Oct. 20, 2022]. [6]Castro M, Liskov B, 2002. Practical Byzantine fault tolerance and proactive recovery. ACM Trans Comput Syst, 20(4):398-461. [7]Chaudhary R, Jindal A, Aujla GS, et al., 2019. BEST: blockchain-based secure energy trading in SDN-enabled intelligent transportation system. Comput Secur, 85:288-299. [8]Chen CH, Chen X, Yu JS, et al., 2021. Impact of temporary fork on the evolution of mining pools in blockchain networks: an evolutionary game analysis. IEEE Trans Netw Sci Eng, 8(1):400-418. [9]Cheng HJ, Xie Z, Shi YS, et al., 2019. Multi-step data prediction in wireless sensor networks based on one-dimensional CNN and bidirectional LSTM. IEEE Access, 7:117883-117896. [10]Ding XJ, Guo JX, Li DY, et al., 2021. An incentive mechanism for building a secure blockchain-based Internet of Things. IEEE Trans Netw Sci Eng, 8(1):477-487. [11]Feng JY, Zhao XY, Chen KX, et al., 2020. Towards random-honest miners selection and multi-blocks creation: proof-of-negotiation consensus mechanism in blockchain networks. Fut Gener Comput Syst, 105:248-258. [12]Frankenfield J, 2023. What Does Proof-of-Stake (PoS) Mean in Crypto?Available fromhttps://www.investopedia.com/terms/p/proof-stake-pos.asp [Accessed on June 1, 2023]. [13]Gupta R, Tanwar S, Tyagi N, et al., 2019. HaBiTs: blockchain-based telesurgery framework for Healthcare 4.0. Int Conf on Computer, Information and Telecommunication Systems, p.1-5. [14]He HY, Luo Z, Wang Q, et al., 2020. Joint operation mechanism of distributed photovoltaic power generation market and carbon market based on cross-chain trading technology. IEEE Access, 8:66116-66130. [15]Herlihy M, 2018. Atomic cross-chain swaps. Proc ACM Symp on Principles of Distributed Computing, p.245-254. [16]Hewa TM, Kalla A, Nag A, et al., 2020. Blockchain for 5G and IoT: opportunities and challenges. IEEE 8th Int Conf on Communications and Networking, p.1-8. [17]Hou H, 2017. The application of blockchain technology in e-government in China. 26th Int Conf on Computer Communication and Networks, p.1-4. [18]Kumar P, Kumar R, Srivastava G, et al., 2021. PPSF: a privacy-preserving and secure framework using blockchain-based machine-learning for IoT-driven smart cities. IEEE Trans Netw Sci Eng, 8(3):2326-2341. [19]Liu DX, Huang C, Ni JB, et al., 2021. Blockchain-based smart advertising network with privacy-preserving accountability. IEEE Trans Netw Sci Eng, 8(3):2118-2130. [20]Nakamoto S, 2008. Bitcoin: a Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System. Available fromhttps://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf [Accessed on Oct. 20, 2022]. [21]Peters GW, Panayi E, Chapelle A, 2015. Trends in cryptocurrencies and blockchain technologies: a monetary theory and regulation perspective. J Finan Persp, 3(3):92-113. [22]Sharma PK, Kumar N, Park JH, 2019. Blockchain-based distributed framework for automotive industry in a smart city. IEEE Trans Ind Inform, 15(7):4197-4205. [23]Shi GH, Zhong H, Chen WG, 2008. Study on the models of cross-chain inventory collaboration in the cluster supply chain. IEEE Int Conf on Service Operations and Logistics, and Informatics, p.2114-2118. [24]Xiong NX, Vasilakos AV, Wu J, et al., 2012. A self-tuning failure detection scheme for cloud computing service. IEEE 26th Int Parallel and Distributed Processing Symp, p.668-679. [25]Zhang W, Zhu SW, Tang J, et al., 2018. A novel trust management scheme based on Dempster–Shafer evidence theory for malicious nodes detection in wireless sensor networks. J Supercomput, 74(4):1779-1801. [26]Zheng ZB, Xie SA, Dai HN, et al., 2018. Blockchain challenges and opportunities: a survey. Int J Web Grid Serv, 14(4):352-375. Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE, 38 Zheda Road, Hangzhou
310027, China
Tel: +86-571-87952783; E-mail: cjzhang@zju.edu.cn Copyright © 2000 - 2024 Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE |
Open peer comments: Debate/Discuss/Question/Opinion
<1>