CLC number: R73-3
On-line Access: 2019-04-01
Received: 2018-10-09
Revision Accepted: 2019-02-12
Crosschecked: 2019-03-01
Cited: 0
Clicked: 4863
Li-Ying Wang, shu-Sen Zheng. Advances in low-frequency ultrasound combined with microbubbles in targeted tumor therapy[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University Science B,in press.Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering,in press.https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.B1800508 @article{title="Advances in low-frequency ultrasound combined with microbubbles in targeted tumor therapy", %0 Journal Article TY - JOUR
肿瘤靶向治疗中低频超声联合微泡造影剂的研究新进展关键词组: Darkslateblue:Affiliate; Royal Blue:Author; Turquoise:Article
Reference[1]Bai WK, Zhang W, Hu B, et al., 2016. Liposome-mediated transfection of wild-type P53 DNA into human prostate cancer cells is improved by low-frequency ultrasound combined with microbubbles. Oncol Lett, 11(6):3829-3834. [2]Delalande A, Bastié C, Pigeon L, et al., 2017. Cationic gas-filled microbubbles for ultrasound-based nucleic acids delivery. Biosci Rep, 37(6):BSR20160619. [3]Feng R, 2004. Ultrasound cavitation and ultrasound medicine. Chin J Ultrasonogr, 13(1):63-65 (in Chinese). [4]Gangeh MJ, Hashim A, Giles A, et al., 2016. Computer aided prognosis for cell death categorization and prediction in vivo using quantitative ultrasound and machine learning techniques. Med Phys, 43(12):6439-6454. [5]Gramiak R, Shah PM, 1968. Echocardiography of the aortic root. Invest Radiol, 3(5):356-366. [6]Grieser F, Choi PK, Enomoto N, et al., 2015. Sonochemistry and the Acoustic Bubble. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, p.41-83. [7]Hodnett M, Zeqiri B, 2008. Toward a reference ultrasonic cavitation vessel: Part 2: investigating the spatial variation and acoustic pressure threshold of inertial cavitation in a 25 kHz ultrasound field. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control, 55(8):1809-1822. [8]Hou R, Xu YJ, Lu QJ, et al., 2017. Effect of low-frequency low-intensity ultrasound with microbubbles on prostate cancer hypoxia. Tumour Biol, 39(10):1010428317719275. [9]Ji YL, Han Z, Shao LM, et al., 2016. Evaluation of in vivo antitumor effects of low-frequency ultrasound-mediated miRNA-133a microbubble delivery in breast cancer. Cancer Med, 5(9):2534-2543. [10]Lagneaux L, de Meulenaer EC, Delforge A, et al., 2002. Ultrasonic low-energy treatment: a novel approach to induce apoptosis in human leukemic cells. Exp Hematol, 30(11):1293-1301. [11]Lavon I, Kost J, 2004. Ultrasound and transdermal drug delivery. Drug Discov Today, 9(15):670-676. [12]Li QY, Li HY, He CJ, et al., 2017. The use of 5-fluorouracil-loaded nanobubbles combined with low-frequency ultrasound to treat hepatocellular carcinoma in nude mice. Eur J Med Res, 22:48. [13]Lin HY, Chen JF, Chen CP, 2016. A novel technology: microfluidic devices for microbubble ultrasound contrast agent generation. Med Biol Eng Comput, 54(9):1317-1330. [14]Lin L, Baehrecke EH, 2015. Autophagy, cell death, and cancer. Mol Cell Oncol, 2(3):e985913. [15]Mariglia J, Momin S, Coe IR, et al., 2018. Analysis of the cytotoxic effects of combined ultrasound, microbubble and nucleoside analog combinations on pancreatic cells in vitro. Ultrasonics, 89:110-117. [16]Moon H, Kang J, Sim C, et al., 2015a. Multifunctional theranostic contrast agent for photoacoustics- and ultrasound-based tumor diagnosis and ultrasound-stimulated local tumor therapy. J Control Release, 218:63-71. [17]Moon H, Yoon C, Lee TW, et al., 2015b. Therapeutic ultrasound contrast agents for the enhancement of tumor diagnosis and tumor therapy. J Biomed Nanotechnol, 11(7):1183-1192. [18]Mulvana H, Browning RJ, Luan Y, et al., 2017. Characterization of contrast agent microbubbles for ultrasound imaging and therapy research. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control, 64(1):232-251. [19]Nguyen TT, Asakura Y, Koda S, et al., 2017. Dependence of cavitation, chemical effect, and mechanical effect thresholds on ultrasonic frequency. Ultrason Sonochem, 39:301-306. [20]Pétrier C, Francony A, 1997. Ultrasonic waste-water treatment: incidence of ultrasonic frequency on the rate of phenol and carbon tetrachloride degradation. Ultrason Sonochem, 4(4):295-300. [21]Qian LJ, Thapa B, Hong J, et al., 2018. The present and future role of ultrasound targeted microbubble destruction in preclinical studies of cardiac gene therapy. J Thorac Dis, 10(2):1099-1111. [22]https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd.2018.01.101 [23]Rebecca VW, Amaravadi RK, 2016. Emerging strategies to effectively target autophagy in cancer. Oncogene, 35(1):1-11. [24]Ren ST, Liao YR, Kang XN, et al., 2013. The antitumor effect of a new docetaxel-loaded microbubble combined with low-frequency ultrasound in vitro: preparation and parameter analysis. Pharm Res, 30(6):1574-1585. [25]Ren ST, Shen S, He XY, et al., 2016. The effect of docetaxel-loaded micro-bubbles combined with low-frequency ultrasound in H22 hepatocellular carcinoma-bearing mice. Ultrasound Med Biol, 42(2):549-560. [26]Sadeghi-Naini A, Stanisz M, Tadayyon H, et al., 2016. Low-frequency ultrasound radiosensitization and therapy response monitoring of tumors: an in vivo study. Proc 38th Annual Int Conf of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, p.3227-3230. [27]Schutt EG, Klein DH, Mattrey RM, et al., 2003. Injectable microbubbles as contrast agents for diagnostic ultrasound imaging: the key role of perfluorochemicals. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl, 42(28):3218-3235. [28]Shen YY, Pi ZK, Yan F, et al., 2017. Enhanced delivery of paclitaxel liposomes using focused ultrasound with microbubbles for treating nude mice bearing intracranial glioblastoma xenografts. Int J Nanomed, 12:5613-5629. [29]Shen ZY, Shen E, Zhang JZ, et al., 2013. Effects of low-frequency ultrasound and microbubbles on angiogenesis-associated proteins in subcutaneous tumors of nude mice. Oncol Rep, 30(2):842-850. [30]Shen ZY, Shen E, Diao XH, et al., 2014. Inhibitory effects of subcutaneous tumors in nude mice mediated by low-frequency ultrasound and microbubbles. Oncol Lett, 7(5):1385-1390. [31]Shen ZY, Liu C, Wu MF, et al., 2017. Spiral computed tomography evaluation of rabbit VX2 hepatic tumors treated with 20 kHz ultrasound and microbubbles. Oncol Lett, 14(3):3124-3130. [32]Shen ZY, Jiang YM, Zhou YF, et al., 2018. High-speed photographic observation of the sonication of a rabbit carotid artery filled with microbubbles by 20-kHz low frequency ultrasound. Ultrason Sonochem, 40:980-987. [33]Shi MM, Chen L, Wang YX, et al., 2018. Effect of low-frequency pulsed ultrasound on drug delivery, antibacterial efficacy, and bone cement degradation in vancomycin-loaded calcium phosphate cement. Med Sci Monit, 24: 797-802. [34]https://doi.org/10.12659/MSM.908776 [35]Shimizu S, Yoshida T, Tsujioka M, et al., 2014. Autophagic cell death and cancer. Int J Mol Sci, 15(2):3145-3153. [36]Shriki J, 2014. Ultrasound physics. Crit Care Clin, 30(1):1-24. [37]Tang H, Mitragotri S, Blankschtein D, et al., 2001. Theoretical description of transdermal transport of hydrophilic permeants: application to low-frequency sonophoresis. J Pharm Sci, 90(5):545-568. [38]Tezel A, Sens A, Mitragotri S, 2002. Investigations of the role of cavitation in low-frequency sonophoresis using acoustic spectroscopy. J Pharm Sci, 91(2):444-453. [39]Ueda H, Mutoh M, Seki T, et al., 2009. Acoustic cavitation as an enhancing mechanism of low-frequency sonophoresis for transdermal drug delivery. Biol Pharm Bull, 32(5):916-920. [40]Upadhyay A, Dalvi SV, 2019. Microbubble formulations: synthesis, stability, modeling and biomedical applications. Ultrasound Med Biol, 45(2):301-343. [41]Wang P, Yin TH, Li JG, et al., 2016. Ultrasound-responsive microbubbles for sonography-guided siRNA delivery. Nanomedicine, 12(4):1139-1149. [42]Wang Y, 2015. Researches in Vitro About Mechanism of Increased Chemotherapeutic Effect of Prostate Cancer Cells by Low-frequency and Low-power Ultrasound Combined with Microbubble. PhD Dissemination, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China (in Chinese). [43]Wu BL, Qiao Q, Han X, et al., 2016. Targeted nanobubbles in low-frequency ultrasound-mediated gene transfection and growth inhibition of hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Tumour Biol, 37(9):12113-12121. [44]Wu JR, Nyborg WL, 2008. Ultrasound, cavitation bubbles and their interaction with cells. Adv Drug Deliv Rev, 60(10):1103-1116. [45]Wu YQ, Liu XB, Qin ZZ, et al., 2018. Low-frequency ultrasound enhances chemotherapy sensitivity and induces autophagy in PTX-resistant PC-3 cells via the endoplasmic reticulum stress-mediated PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling pathway. Oncol Targets Ther, 11:5621-5630. [46]Xiao NN, Liu JH, Liao LL, et al., 2018. Ultrasound combined with microbubbles increase the delivery of doxorubicin by reducing the interstitial fluid pressure. Ultrasound Quart, in press. [47]Yang Y, Bai WK, Chen YN, et al., 2015a. Low-frequency and low-intensity ultrasound-mediated microvessel disruption enhance the effects of radiofrequency ablation on prostate cancer xenografts in nude mice. Mol Med Rep, 12(5):7517-7525. [48]Yang Y, Bai WK, Chen YN, et al., 2015b. Optimization of low-frequency low-intensity ultrasound-mediated microvessel disruption on prostate cancer xenografts in nude mice using an orthogonal experimental design. Oncol Lett, 10(5):2999-3007. [49]Yang Y, Bai WK, Chen YN, et al., 2016. Low-frequency ultrasound-mediated microvessel disruption combined with docetaxel to treat prostate carcinoma xenografts in nude mice: a novel type of chemoembolization. Oncol Lett, 12(2):1011-1018. [50]Zarzynska JM, 2014. The importance of autophagy regulation in breast cancer development and treatment. Biomed Res Int, 2014:710345. [51]Zhang L, Yin TH, Li B, et al., 2018. Size-modulable nanoprobe for high-performance ultrasound imaging and drug delivery against cancer. ACS Nano, 12(4):3449-3460. [52]Zhang W, Shou WD, Xu YJ, et al., 2017. Low-frequency ultrasound-induced VEGF suppression and synergy with dendritic cell-mediated anti-tumor immunity in murine prostate cancer cells in vitro. Sci Rep, 7:5778. [53]Zhao L, Feng Y, Shi AW, et al., 2015. Apoptosis induced by microbubble-assisted acoustic cavitation in k562 cells: the predominant role of the cyclosporin A-dependent mitochondrial permeability transition pore. Ultrasound Med Biol, 41(10):2755-2764. [54]Zhao RR, Liang XL, Zhao B, et al., 2018. Ultrasound assisted gene and photodynamic synergistic therapy with multifunctional FOXA1-siRNA loaded porphyrin microbubbles for enhancing therapeutic efficacy for breast cancer. Biomaterials, 173:58-70. Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE, 38 Zheda Road, Hangzhou
310027, China
Tel: +86-571-87952783; E-mail: cjzhang@zju.edu.cn Copyright © 2000 - 2024 Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE |
Open peer comments: Debate/Discuss/Question/Opinion
<1>