Full Text:   <916>

Summary:  <519>

CLC number: C36; TP301

On-line Access: 2018-12-28

Received: 2018-09-11

Revision Accepted: 2018-12-02

Crosschecked: 2019-12-21

Cited: 0

Clicked: 2094

Citations:  Bibtex RefMan EndNote GB/T7714


Yu-xian Liu


Ronald Rousseau


-   Go to

Article info.
Open peer comments

Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering  2020 Vol.21 No.4 P.635-648


Dynamic aspects of domination networks



Corresponding email(s): 

Key Words:  Domination, Power structure, Digraphs, Network dynamics

Share this article to: More <<< Previous Article|

sorry,no result found

sorry,no result found

sorry,no result found

sorry,no result found

A dynamic quantitative theory and measurement of power or dominance structures are proposed. Such power structures are represented as directed networks. A graph somewhat similar to the Lorenz curve for inequality measurement is introduced. The changes in the graph resulting from network dynamics are studied. Dynamics are operationalized in terms of added nodes and links. Study of dynamic aspects of networks is essential for potential applications in many fields such as business management, politics, and social interactions. As such, we provide examples of a dominance structure in a directed, acyclic network. We calculate the change in the D-measure, which is a measure expressing the degree of dominance in a network when nodes are added to an existing simple network.


刘玉仙1,2,Ronald ROUSSEAU3,4



Darkslateblue:Affiliate; Royal Blue:Author; Turquoise:Article


[1]Chase ID, 1982. Dynamics of hierarchy formation: the sequential development of dominance relationships. Behaviour, 80(3-4):218-239.

[2]Clark BR, 1987. The Academic Life: Small Worlds, Different Worlds. The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, Princeton, USA.

[3]Dalton H, 1920. The measurement of the inequality of incomes. Econ J, 30(119):348-361.

[4]Egghe L, 2002. Development of hierarchy theory for digraphs using concentration theory based on a new type of Lorenz curve. Math Comput Model, 36(4-5):587-602.

[5]Egghe L, Rousseau R, 2004. A local hierarchy theory for acyclic digraphs. Math Comput Model, 39(1):107-117.

[6]Gutiérrez L, Oh HJ, Gillmore MR, 2000. Toward an understanding of (em)power(ment) for HIV/AIDS prevention with adolescent women. Sex Roles, 42(7-8):581-611.

[7]Liu YX, Rousseau R, 2017. Further examples of dominance structure measurement. Proc 16th Conf on Scientometrics & Informetrics, p.1024-1034.

[8]Liu YX, Rousseau R, 2019. Ego citation networks considered as domination networks. J Sci Res, 8(1):1-8.

[9]Liu YX, Liu L, Rousseau R, et al., 2013. Dynamics and interactions of blog-based science communication: a case study of blogging activities in China related to 2011 Japanese seismic and nuclear power crisis. Chin J Libr Inform Sci, 6(1):33-51.

[10]Liu YX, Rousseau R, Egghe L, 2017. Partial orders for zero- sum arrays with applications to network theory. J Inform, 11(1):257-274.

[11]Lorenz MO, 1905. Methods of measuring the concentration of wealth. Publ Am Stat Assoc, 9(70):209-219.

[12]Lu YF, Lu YB, Wang B, et al., 2015. Acceptance of government- sponsored agricultural information systems in China: the role of government social power. Inform Syst e-Bus Manag, 13(2):329-354.

[13]Marshall AW, Olkin I, Arnold BC, 2011. Inequalities: Theory of Majorization and Its Applications (2nd). Springer, New York, USA.

[14]Montgomery K, Oliver AL, 2007. A fresh look at how professions take shape: dual-directed networking dynamics and social boundaries. Organ Stud, 28(5):661-687.

[15]Nijssen D, Rousseau R, van Hecke P, 1998. The Lorenz curve: a graphical representation of evenness. Coenoses, 13:33-38.

[16]Nord JH, Lee TR, Cetin F, et al., 2016. Examining the impact of social technologies on empowerment and economic development. Int J Inform Manag, 36(6):1101-1110.

[17]Oreglia E, Srinivasan J, 2016. ICT, intermediaries, and the transformation of gendered power structures. MIS Quart, 40(2):501-510.

[18]Pacardo-Mercado AB, 2013. Women at work: women on a “balance beam”―the case of selected women workers in San Pascual, Batangas Province, Philippines. Asia Life Sci, 22(2):605-634.

[19]Rousseau R, 2011. Lorenz curves determine partial orders for comparing network structures. DESIDOC J Libr Inform Technol, 31(5):340-347.

[20]Sales A, 1991. The private, the public and civil society: social realms and power structures. Int Pol Sci Rev, 12(4):295- 312.

[21]Shizuka D, McDonald DB, 2012. A social network perspective on measurements of dominance hierarchies. Anim Behav, 83(4):925-934.

[22]Toth N, Gulyás L, Legendi RO, et al., 2013. The importance of centralities in dark network value chains. Eur Phys J Spec Top, 222(6):1413-1439.

[23]Truex D, Cuellar M, Takeda H, 2009. Assessing scholarly influence: using the Hirsch indices to reframe the discourse. J Assoc Inform Syst, 10(7):560-594.

[24]van de Graaff JH, Clark BR, Furth D, et al., 1978. Academic Power: Patterns of Authority in Seven National Systems of Higher Education. Praeger, New York, USA.

[25]Wei L, 2009. Filter blogs vs. personal journals: understanding the knowledge production gap on the Internet. J Comput Med Commun, 14(3):532-558.

Open peer comments: Debate/Discuss/Question/Opinion


Please provide your name, email address and a comment

Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE, 38 Zheda Road, Hangzhou 310027, China
Tel: +86-571-87952783; E-mail: cjzhang@zju.edu.cn
Copyright © 2000 - Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE