Similar articles

Abstract: Leakage currents, tiny currents flowing from an everyday-life appliance through the body to the ground, can cause a non-adequate perception (called electrocutaneous sensation, ECS) or even pain and should be avoided. Safety standards for low-frequency range are based on experimental results of current thresholds of electrocutaneous sensations, which however show a wide range between about 50 μA (rms) and 1000 μA (rms). In order to be able to explain these differences, the perception threshold was measured repeatedly in experiments with test persons under identical experimental setup, but by means of different methods (measuring strategies), namely: direct adjustment, classical threshold as amperage of 50% perception probability, and confidence rating procedure of signal detection theory. The current is injected using a 1 cm² electrode at the highly touch sensitive part of the index fingertip. These investigations show for the first time that the threshold of electrocutaneous sensations is influenced both by adaptation to the non-adequate stimulus and individual, emotional factors. Therefore, classical methods, on which the majority of the safety investigations are based, cannot be used to determine a leakage current threshold. The confidence rating procedure of the modern signal detection theory yields a value of 179.5 μA (rms) at 50 Hz power supply net frequency as the lower end of the 95% confidence range considering the variance in the investigated group. This value is expected to be free of adaptation influences, and is distinctly lower than the European limits and supports the stricter regulations of Canada and USA.

[1] Dalziel, C.F., 1954. The threshold of perception currents. AIEE Trans. Power Apparatus Syst., 73:990-996.

[2] Dalziel, C.F., Mansfield, T.H., 1950. Effect of frequency on perception currents. AIEE Trans., 69:1162-1168.

[3] Gescheider, G.A., 1976. Psychophysics: Method and Theory. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, New Jersey.

[4] Irnich, W., Batz, L., 1989. The perception threshold for 50 Hz alternating voltage and current. Biomed. Tech. (Berl.), 34(9):207-209.

[5] Johansson, R.S., Vallbo, A.B., 1979. Tactile sensibility in the human hand: relative and absolute densities of four types of mechanoreceptive units in glabrous skin. J. Physiol. (Lond), 286:283-300.

[6] Kaczmarek, K.A., Webster, J.G., Bach-y-Rita, P., Tompkins, W.J., 1991. Electrotactile and vibrotactile displays for sensory substitution systems. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., 38(1):1-16.

[7] Leitgeb, N., Schrottner, J., 2001. Risk from electric current greater than assumed. Biomed. Tech. (Berl.), 46(11):307-310 (in German).

[8] Levin, M., 1991. Perception of chassis leakage current. Biomed. Instrum. Technol., 25(2):135-140.

[9] Macmillan, N.A., Creelman, C.D., 1991. Detection Theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

[10] Patino, J., Korneluk, J.E., Tracy, J.L., 2006. Apparatus and Method for Stimulating One or More Areas on a Wearer. United States Patent Application 20060084480.

[11] Schmidt, R.F., Thews, G., 1995. Physiologie des Menschen, 26th Ed. Springer, Heidelberg.

[12] Sorkin, R.D., 1999. Spreadsheet signal detection. Behav. Res. Methods Instrum. Comput., 31(1):46-54.

[13] Southwood, W.F.W., 1955. The thickness of the skin. Plast. Reconstr. Surg., 15(1):423-429.

[14] Stanislaw, H., Todorov, N., 1999. Calculation of signal detection theory measures. Behav. Res. Methods Instrum. Comput., 31(1):137-149.

[15] Tan, K.S., Johnson, D.L., 1990. Threshold of sensation for 60-Hz leakage current: results of a survey. Biomed. Instrum. Technol., 24(3):207-211.

[16] Tursky, B., O'Connell, D., 1972. Reliability and interjudgment predictability of subjective judgments of electrocutaneous stimulation. Psychophysiology, 9(3):290-295.

[17] Vallbo, A.B., Johansson, R.S., 1984. Properties of cutaneous mechanoreceptors in the human hand related to touch sensation. Hum. Neurobiol., 3(1):3-14.

[18] Whitton, J.T., 1973. New values for epidermal thickness and their importance. Health Phys., 24(1):1-8.

[19] Whitton, J.T., Everall, J.D., 1973. The thickness of the epidermis. Br. J. Dermatol., 89(5):467-476.