Full Text:   <560>

Summary:  <127>

CLC number: TU45

On-line Access: 2018-04-04

Received: 2017-02-22

Revision Accepted: 2017-07-28

Crosschecked: 2018-03-07

Cited: 0

Clicked: 1281

Citations:  Bibtex RefMan EndNote GB/T7714

 ORCID:

Yu-chao Li

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3636-5007

-   Go to

Article info.
Open peer comments

Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE A 2018 Vol.19 No.4 P.277-288

10.1631/jzus.A1700097


Non-monotonic piezocone dissipation curves of backfills in a soil-bentonite slurry trench cutoff wall


Author(s):  Yu-chao Li, Xing Tong, Yun Chen, Han Ke, Yun-min Chen, Yi-duo Wen, Qian Pan

Affiliation(s):  MOE Key Laboratory of Soft Soils and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China; more

Corresponding email(s):   chenyunmin@zju.edu.cn

Key Words:  Piezocone, Dissipation test, Soil-bentonite cutoff wall, Coefficient of consolidation, Hydraulic conductivity


Yu-chao Li, Xing Tong, Yun Chen, Han Ke, Yun-min Chen, Yi-duo Wen, Qian Pan. Non-monotonic piezocone dissipation curves of backfills in a soil-bentonite slurry trench cutoff wall[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University Science A, 2018, 19(3): 277-288.

@article{title="Non-monotonic piezocone dissipation curves of backfills in a soil-bentonite slurry trench cutoff wall",
author="Yu-chao Li, Xing Tong, Yun Chen, Han Ke, Yun-min Chen, Yi-duo Wen, Qian Pan",
journal="Journal of Zhejiang University Science A",
volume="19",
number="4",
pages="277-288",
year="2018",
publisher="Zhejiang University Press & Springer",
doi="10.1631/jzus.A1700097"
}

%0 Journal Article
%T Non-monotonic piezocone dissipation curves of backfills in a soil-bentonite slurry trench cutoff wall
%A Yu-chao Li
%A Xing Tong
%A Yun Chen
%A Han Ke
%A Yun-min Chen
%A Yi-duo Wen
%A Qian Pan
%J Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE A
%V 19
%N 4
%P 277-288
%@ 1673-565X
%D 2018
%I Zhejiang University Press & Springer

TY - JOUR
T1 - Non-monotonic piezocone dissipation curves of backfills in a soil-bentonite slurry trench cutoff wall
A1 - Yu-chao Li
A1 - Xing Tong
A1 - Yun Chen
A1 - Han Ke
A1 - Yun-min Chen
A1 - Yi-duo Wen
A1 - Qian Pan
J0 - Journal of Zhejiang University Science A
VL - 19
IS - 4
SP - 277
EP - 288
%@ 1673-565X
Y1 - 2018
PB - Zhejiang University Press & Springer
ER -


Abstract: 
Pore pressure dissipation during piezocone testing provides a unique tool for estimating the hydraulic properties of in-situ backfills in soil-bentonite (SB) slurry trench cutoff walls. Six tests were performed in an SB slurry trench cutoff wall located in Jiangsu Province, China. The pore pressure dissipation curves obtained are non-monotonic, which, as far as the authors are aware, is reported for the first time in SB cutoff walls. The non-monotonic dissipation curves are attributed to the redistribution of excess pore pressures between the base soil clods and the rest of the backfill around the cone. Four existing interpretation methods are adopted to analyze the measured non-monotonic piezocone dissipation curves. The horizontal coefficients of consolidation (ch) of the backfills obtained by three methods are close to each other and in agreement with the results of fixed-ring consolidometer tests, while the other method gives a high overestimate. The hydraulic conductivities (kh) of the backfills are also estimated by four methods, three based on dissipation test results and one based on piezocone penetration data. kh estimated by consolidation theory are close to the results of flexible wall permeameter tests. Two empirical expressions for dissipation tests give relatively low kh, but the method based on penetration gives kh much larger than the laboratory test results.

This paper investigated the behavior of dissipation of pore water dissipation from piezocone test on backfills in a soil-bentonite slurry trench cutoff wall. The content of this manuscript is original and has the value to scientific study, which are interesting to researchers as well.

土-膨润土隔离墙孔压静力触探非单调消散曲线研究

目的:土-膨润土隔离墙的水力特性可通过孔压静力触探试验进行评价.本文旨在研究土-膨润土隔离墙中孔压消散试验产生非单调孔压消散曲线的原因,并对现有计算固结系数与渗透系数的方法在土-膨润土隔离墙中的适用性进行分析.
创新点:1. 首次在土-膨润土隔离墙中测得非单调的孔压消散曲线;2. 本文认为在土-膨润土隔离墙中测得非单调孔压消散曲线是由于探头贯入过程中在填料及其包裹的土块中产生的超孔压不一致引起的,并且由于填料的低渗透性,孔压上升的时间较长;3. 比较不同方法的分析结果,并推荐结果与实测相近的计算方法作为工程应用.
方法:1. 通过室内一维固结试验和柔性壁渗透试验,分别获得墙体材料的固结系数和渗透系数;2. 通过现场土-膨润土隔离墙的孔压静力触探试验与孔压消散试验,获得相应的力学参数与孔压消散曲线; 3. 分别采用不同方法对墙体材料的固结系数和渗透系数进行计算,并将计算结果与室内试验结果进行比较.
结论:1. 填料的非均质性导致探头贯入过程中产生的超孔压存在重分布,这使得土-膨润土隔离墙中产生了非单调孔压消散曲线,并且由于填料的低渗透性,测得孔压上升的时间较长;2. 四种计算固结系数的方法中,有三种结果与室内一维固结试验结果相近,另一种结果则明显偏大;3. 四种计算渗透系数的方法中,基于太沙基固结理论的关系式得到的结果与室内柔壁渗透试验结果相近,另两种经验公式得到的结果偏小,而基于探头贯入数据计算的渗透系数则偏大.

关键词:孔压静力触探;消散试验;土-膨润土隔离墙;固结系数;渗透系数

Darkslateblue:Affiliate; Royal Blue:Author; Turquoise:Article

Reference

[1]Abu-Farsakh MY, Nazzal MD, 2005. Reliability of piezocone penetration test methods for estimating the coefficient of consolidation of cohesive soils. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1913:62-76.

[2]Ansari Y, Merifield R, Sheng D, 2014. A piezocone dissipation test interpretation method for hydraulic conductivity of soft clays. Soils and Foundations, 54(6):1104-1116.

[3]ASTM (American Society for Testing and Materials), 2010. Standard Test Methods for Measurement of Hydraulic Conductivity of Saturated Porous Materials Using a Flexible Wall Permeameter, ASTM D5084-10. ASTM, West Conshohocken, USA.

[4]ASTM (American Society for Testing and Materials), 2011a. Standard Test Methods for One-dimensional Consolidation Properties of Soils Using Incremental Loading, ASTM D2435-11. ASTM, West Conshohocken, USA.

[5]ASTM (American Society for Testing and Materials), 2011b. Standard Practice for Classification of Soils for Engineering Purposes (Unified Soil Classification System), ASTM D2487-11. ASTM, West Conshohocken, USA.

[6]Baligh MM, Levadoux JN, 1980. Pore Pressure Dissipation after Cone Penetration. Department of Civil Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA.

[7]Baligh MM, Azzouz AS, Wissa AZE, et al., 1981. The piezocone penetrometer. Cone Penetration Testing and Experience: Proceedings of a Session Sponsored by the Geotechnical Engineering Division at the ASCE National Convention.

[8]Baxter DY, 2000. Mechanical Behavior of Soil-bentonite Cutoff Walls. PhD Thesis, Virginia Polytechnical Institute and State University, Blacksburg, USA.

[9]Bennert TA, Maher A, Jafari F, 2005. Piezocone evaluation of a shallow soil-bentonite slurry wall. Geo-Frontiers Congress, ASCE.

[10]Bol E, 2013. The influence of pore pressure gradients in soil classification during piezocone penetration test. Engineering Geology, 157:69-78.

[11]Britton JP, Filz GM, Herring WE, 2004. Measuring the hydraulic conductivity of soil–bentonite backfill. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 130(12):1250-1258.

[12]Burns SE, Mayne PW, 1998. Monotonic and dilatory pore-pressure decay during piezocone tests in clay. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 35(6):1063-1073.

[13]Burns SE, Mayne PW, 2002. Analytical cavity expansion-critical state model for piezocone dissipation in fine-grained soils. Soils and Foundations, 42(2):131-137.

[14]Cai GJ, Liu SY, Tong LY, et al., 2007. Study on consolidation and permeability properties of Lianyungang marine clay based on piezocone penetration test. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 26(4):846-852 (in Chinese).

[15]Cai GJ, Liu SY, Puppala AJ, 2011. Comparison of CPT charts for soil classification using PCPT data: example from clay deposits in Jiangsu Province, China. Engineering Geology, 121(1-2):89-96.

[16]Cai GJ, Liu SY, Puppala AJ, 2012. Predictions of coefficient of consolidation from CPTU dissipation tests in Quaternary clays. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 71(2):337-350.

[17]Chai JC, Agung PMA, Hino T, et al., 2011. Estimating hydraulic conductivity from piezocone soundings. Géotechnique, 61(8):699-708.

[18]Chai JC, Sheng DC, Carter JP, et al., 2012. Coefficient of consolidation from non-standard piezocone dissipation curves. Computers and Geotechnics, 41(4):13-22.

[19]Chai JC, Hossain MJ, Carter J, et al., 2014. Cone penetration-induced pore pressure distribution and dissipation. Computers and Geotechnics, 57(4):105-113.

[20]Chai JC, Hossain MJ, Yuan DJ, et al., 2016. Pore pressures induced by piezocone penetration. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 53(3):540-550.

[21]Chang MF, Teh CI, Cao LF, 2001. Undrained cavity expansion in modified Cam clay II: application to the interpretation of the piezocone test. Géotechnique, 51(4):335-350.

[22]Colreavy C, Oloughlin CD, Randolph MF, 2016. Estimating consolidation parameters from field piezoball tests. Géotechnique, 66(4):333-343.

[23]Coop MR, Wroth CP, 1989. Field studies of an instrumented model pile in clay. Géotechnique, 39(4):679-696.

[24]Davidson JL, 1985. Pore Pressure Generated during Cone Penetration Testing in Heavily Overconsolidated Clays. In Discussion Session 2D: Field Instrumentation and Field Measurements. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Found, 5:2699.

[25]Elsworth D, Lee DS, 2005. Permeability determination from on-the-fly piezocone sounding. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 131(5):643-653.

[26]Elsworth D, Lee DS, 2007. Limits in determining permeability from on-the-fly UCPT sounding. Géotechnique, 57(8):679-685.

[27]Filz GM, 1996. Consolidation stresses in soil-bentonite backfilled trenches. 2nd International Congress on Environmental Geotechnics, p.497-502.

[28]Ha TG, Jang IS, Choo YS, et al., 2014. Evaluation of coefficient of consolidation for dilatory dissipation in piezocone test in overconsolidated cohesive soils. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 18(2):475-487.

[29]Imre E, Rozsa P, Bates L, et al., 2010. Evaluation of monotonic and non-monotonic dissipation test results. Computers and Geotechnics, 37(7-8):885-904.

[30]Jones S, Spaulding C, Symth P, 2007. Design and construction of a deep soil-bentonite groundwater barrier wall at Newcastle, Australia. 10th Australian New Zealand Conference on Geomechanics Common Ground.

[31]Karakouzian M, Avar BB, Hudyma N, et al., 2003. Field measurements of shear strength of an underconsolidated marine clay. Engineering Geology, 67(3-4):233-242.

[32]Li YC, Cleall PJ, Wen YD, et al., 2015. Stresses in soil–bentonite slurry trench cut-off walls. Géotechnique, 65(10):843-850.

[33]Liu SY, Ju J, Cai GJ, et al., 2014. Stress history estimation method of underconsolidated soil by partial piezocone dissipation tests. Marine Georesources and Geotechnology, 32(4):368-378.

[34]Lunne T, Eidsmoen TE, Powell JJM, et al., 1986. Piezocone testing in overconsolidated clays. 39th Canadian Geotechnical Conference, p.209-218.

[35]Mahmoodzadeh H, Randolph MF, Wang D, 2014. Numerical simulation of piezocone dissipation test in clays. Géotechnique, 64(8):657-666.

[36]Malusis MA, Barben EJ, Evans JC, 2009. Hydraulic conductivity and compressibility of soil-bentonite backfill amended with activated carbon. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 135(5):664-672.

[37]National Research Council, 2007. Assessment of the Performance of Engineered Waste Containment Barriers. National Academies Press, Washington DC, USA.

[38]Parez L, Fauriel R, 1988. Le piezocone ameliorations apportees a la reconnaissance de sols. Revue Française de Géotechnique, 44:13-27 (in French).

[39]Robertson PK, Sully JP, Woeller DJ, et al., 1992. Estimating coefficient of consolidation from piezocone tests. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 29(4):539-550.

[40]Ruffing DG, Evans JC, 2010. In situ evaluation of a shallow soil bentonite slurry trench cutoff wall. Proceedings of the 6th International Congress on Environmental Geotechnics, p.756-763.

[41]Ruffing DG, Evans JC, Malusis MA, 2010. Prediction of earth pressures in soil-bentonite cutoff walls. GeoFlorida Conference, ASCE, p.2416-2425.

[42]Ruffing DG, Evans JC, Ryan CR, 2015. Strength and stress estimation in soil bentonite slurry trench cutoff walls using cone penetration test data. Proceedings of the International Foundations Congress and Equipment Expo, p.2567-2576.

[43]Ryan CR, Spaulding CA, 2008. Strength and permeability of a deep soil bentonite slurry wall. GeoCongress: Geotechnics of Waste Management and Remediation, ASCE, p.644-651.

[44]Shen SL, Wang JP, Wu HN, et al., 2015. Evaluation of hydraulic conductivity for both marine and deltaic deposit based on piezocone test. Ocean Engineering, 110(A):174-182.

[45]Sully JP, Robertson PK, Campanella RG, et al., 1999. An approach to evaluation of field CPTU dissipation data in overconsolidated fine-grained soils. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 36(2):369-381.

[46]Takai A, Inui T, Katsumi T, et al., 2013. Hydraulic Barrier Performance of Soil Bentonite Mixture Cutoff Wall. International Symposium on Coupled Phenomena in Environmental Geotechnics, p.707-714.

[47]Teh CI, Houlsby GT, 1991. An analytical study of the cone penetration test in clay. Géotechnique, 41(1):17-34.

[48]Terzaghi K, Peck RB, Mesri G, 1996. Soil Mechanics in Engineering Practice. Wiley, New York, USA.

[49]Wang JP, Xu YS, Ma L, et al., 2013. An approach to evaluate hydraulic conductivity of soil based on CPTU test. Marine Georesources and Geotechnology, 31(3):242-253.

[50]Wroth CP, 1984. The interpretation of in situ soil tests. Géotechnique, 34(4):449-489.

Open peer comments: Debate/Discuss/Question/Opinion

<1>

Please provide your name, email address and a comment





Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE, 38 Zheda Road, Hangzhou 310027, China
Tel: +86-571-87952783; E-mail: cjzhang@zju.edu.cn
Copyright © 2000 - Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE