Full Text:   <716>

Summary:  <216>

CLC number: 

On-line Access: 2023-04-25

Received: 2022-09-01

Revision Accepted: 2022-12-29

Crosschecked: 2023-04-25

Cited: 0

Clicked: 1808

Citations:  Bibtex RefMan EndNote GB/T7714

 ORCID:

Shuangxi LIU

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1422-1096

Binbin YAN

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1082-8808

-   Go to

Article info.
Open peer comments

Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE A 2023 Vol.24 No.5 P.387-403

http://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.A2200423


Current status and prospects of terminal guidance laws for intercepting hypersonic vehicles in near space: a review


Author(s):  Shuangxi LIU, Binbin YAN, Wei HUANG, Xu ZHANG, Jie YAN

Affiliation(s):  Unmanned System Research Institute, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xian 710072, China; more

Corresponding email(s):   yanbinbin@nwpu.edu.cn, gladrain2001@163.com

Key Words:  Hypersonic vehicles, Guidance law, Cooperative guidance, Near space


Share this article to: More |Next Article >>>

Shuangxi LIU, Binbin YAN, Wei HUANG, Xu ZHANG, Jie YAN. Current status and prospects of terminal guidance laws for intercepting hypersonic vehicles in near space: a review[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University Science A, 2023, 24(5): 387-403.

@article{title="Current status and prospects of terminal guidance laws for intercepting hypersonic vehicles in near space: a review",
author="Shuangxi LIU, Binbin YAN, Wei HUANG, Xu ZHANG, Jie YAN",
journal="Journal of Zhejiang University Science A",
volume="24",
number="5",
pages="387-403",
year="2023",
publisher="Zhejiang University Press & Springer",
doi="10.1631/jzus.A2200423"
}

%0 Journal Article
%T Current status and prospects of terminal guidance laws for intercepting hypersonic vehicles in near space: a review
%A Shuangxi LIU
%A Binbin YAN
%A Wei HUANG
%A Xu ZHANG
%A Jie YAN
%J Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE A
%V 24
%N 5
%P 387-403
%@ 1673-565X
%D 2023
%I Zhejiang University Press & Springer
%DOI 10.1631/jzus.A2200423

TY - JOUR
T1 - Current status and prospects of terminal guidance laws for intercepting hypersonic vehicles in near space: a review
A1 - Shuangxi LIU
A1 - Binbin YAN
A1 - Wei HUANG
A1 - Xu ZHANG
A1 - Jie YAN
J0 - Journal of Zhejiang University Science A
VL - 24
IS - 5
SP - 387
EP - 403
%@ 1673-565X
Y1 - 2023
PB - Zhejiang University Press & Springer
ER -
DOI - 10.1631/jzus.A2200423


Abstract: 
The unique performance advantages of hypersonic vehicles represent a critical challenge for existing defense systems. To facilitate defensive operations against hypersonic vehicles in near space, this paper systematically discusses both the advantages of these vehicles and the difficulties in intercepting them. Focusing on the state-of-the-art terminal guidance laws for intercepting hypersonic vehicles in near space, we examine research progress in the area of single- and multi-interceptor cooperative guidance laws and summarize their advantages and disadvantages. We also highlight future research directions for developing an effective terminal guidance law for multi-interceptor cooperative interception of hypersonic vehicles, based on four aspects: the information domain, space domain, physical domain, and effect-cost ratio. The findings provide a reference for further research into near-space interceptor terminal guidance technologies.

拦截临近空间高超声速飞行器末制导律研究进展与展望

作者:刘双喜1,闫斌斌2,黄伟3,张旭1,闫杰1
机构:1西北工业大学,无人系统技术研究院,中国西安,710072;2西北工业大学,航天学院,中国西安,710072;3国防科技大学,空天科学学院,中国长沙,410073
概要:临近空间高超声速飞行器是指在临近空间能够以大于5马赫速度飞行的一类飞行器,具有飞行速度快、突防能力强、作战半径大和响应迅速等特点。凭借其优异的性能优势,高超声速飞行器逐渐成为各个国家新的空天博弈焦点,给现有防御体系带来巨大挑战。为满足临近空间高超声速飞行器防御需求,本文系统性地梳理高超声速飞行器的"五大优势"及拦截高超声速飞行器的"四大难点"。其次,针对现阶段高超声速飞行器拦截制导律,对基于单弹制导律和多弹协同制导律进行综述,并归纳其优缺点。最后,从"信息域"、"空间域"、"物理域"和"效费比"四个方面对协同拦截高超声速飞行器未来发展方向进行了展望,为临近空间拦截制导技术研究提供参考。

关键词:高超声速飞行器;制导律;协同制导;临近空间

Darkslateblue:Affiliate; Royal Blue:Author; Turquoise:Article

Reference

[1]ActonJM, 2015. Hypersonic boost-glide weapons. Science & Global Security, 23(3):191-219.

[2]AiXL, WangLL, YuJQ, et al., 2019. Field-of-view constrained two-stage guidance law design for three-dimensional salvo attack of multiple missiles via an optimal control approach. Aerospace Science and Technology, 85:334-346.

[3]AnK, GuoZY, HuangW, et al., 2022a. A cooperative guidance approach based on the finite-time control theory for hypersonic vehicles. International Journal of Aeronautical and Space Sciences, 23(1):169-179.

[4]AnK, GuoZY, HuangW, et al., 2022b. Leap trajectory tracking control based on sliding mode theory for hypersonic gliding vehicle. Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE A (Applied Physics & Engineering), 23(3):‍188-207.

[5]BanasikM, 2021. Global challenges and threats of hypersonic weapons: the Russian context. Safety & Defense, 7(2):40-50.

[6]BianZ, LiJT, GuoLX, 2020. Simulation and feature extraction of the dynamic electromagnetic scattering of a hypersonic vehicle covered with plasma sheath. Remote Sensing, 12(17):2740.

[7]BianZ, LiJT, GuoLX, et al., 2021. Analyzing the electromagnetic scattering characteristics of a hypersonic vehicle based on the inhomogeneity zonal medium model. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, 69(2):‍971-982.

[8]BolenderMA, DomanDB, 2007. Nonlinear longitudinal dynamical model of an air-breathing hypersonic vehicle. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 44(2):374-387.

[9]BorrieJ, DowlerA, PodvigP, 2019. Hypersonic Weapons: a Challenge and Opportunity for Strategic Arms Control. United Nations Office for Disarmament Affairs, United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research, New York, USA.

[10]ChalangaA, KamalS, FridmanLM, et al., 2016. Implementation of super-twisting control: super-twisting and higher order sliding-mode observer-based approaches. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 63(6):3677-3685.

[11]ChenF, HeGJ, HeQF, 2019. A finite-time-convergent composite guidance law with strong fault-tolerant performance. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 233(9):3120-3130.

[12]ChenK, LiangWC, ZengCZ, et al., 2021. Multi-geomagnetic-component assisted localization algorithm for hypersonic vehicles. Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE A (Applied Physics & Engineering), 22(5):357-368.

[13]ChenK, ZengCZ, PeiSS, et al., 2022. Normal gravity model for inertial navigation of a hypersonic boost-glide vehicle. Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE A (Applied Physics & Engineering), 23(10):55-67.

[14]ChenXT, WangJZ, 2019. Optimal control based guidance law to control both impact time and impact angle. Aerospace Science and Technology, 84:454-463.

[15]ChenYD, WangJA, ShanJY, et al., 2021. Cooperative guidance for multiple powered missiles with constrained impact and bounded speed. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 44(4):825-841.

[16]ChengL, WangZB, JiangFH, et al., 2021. Adaptive neural network control of nonlinear systems with unknown dynamics. Advances in Space Research, 67(3):1114-1123.

[17]CottrellRG, VincentTL, SadatiSH, 1996. Minimizing interceptor size using neural networks for terminal guidance law synthesis. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 19(3):557-562.

[18]DavisS, 2020. Hypersonic Weapons–a Technological Challenge for Allied Nations and NATO? NATO Parliamentary Assembly.

[19]DimirovskiGM, DeskovskiSM, GacovskiZM, 2004. Classical and fuzzy-system guidance laws in homing missiles systems. 2004 IEEE Aerospace Conference Proceedings, p.3032-3047.

[20]DingYB, YueXK, ChenGS, et al., 2022. Review of control and guidance technology on hypersonic vehicle. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 35(7):1-18.

[21]DongWQ, HeF, 2021. Hierarchical and distributed generation of information interaction topology for large scale UAV formation. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 42(6):324380 (in Chinese).

[22]DrakesJA, HiersIII RS, ReedRA, 1992. Doppler shift effects on infrared band models. Journal of Thermophysics and Heat Transfer, 6(1):44-47.

[23]DumitrescuC, CiotirnaeP, VizitiuC, 2021. Fuzzy logic for intelligent control system using soft computing applications. Sensors, 21(8):2617.

[24]EkmektsioglouE, 2015. Hypersonic weapons and escalation control in East Asia. Strategic Studies Quarterly, 9(2):43-68.

[25]ElhalwagyYZ, TarbouchiM, 2004. Fuzzy logic sliding mode control for command guidance law design. ISA Transactions, 43(2):231-242.

[26]FangF, CaiYL, JabbariF, 2019. 3D optimal defensive guidance strategy with safe distance. Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control, 41(15):4285-4300.

[27]FedericiL, BenedikterB, ZavoliA, 2021. Deep learning techniques for autonomous spacecraft guidance during proximity operations. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 58(6):1774-1785.

[28]FuQ, FanCL, WangG, et al., 2017. Research on multi-sensor cooperative tracking mission planning of aerospace hypersonic vehicles. The 2nd International Conference on Control, Automation and Artificial Intelligence, p.201-206.

[29]GengZJ, McCulloughCL, 1997. Missile control using fuzzy cerebellar model arithmetic computer neural networks. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 20(3):557-565.

[30]GengZJ, XuR, McCulloughCL, 1995. Missile control using the fuzzy CMAC neural networks. Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference, p.901.

[31]GuWJ, ZhaoHC, ZhangRC, 2008. A three-dimensional proportional guidance law based on RBF neural network. The 7th World Congress on Intelligent Control and Automation, p.6978-6982.

[32]GubrudM, 2015. Going too fast: time to ban hypersonic missile tests? A US response. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 71(5):1-4.

[33]GuoY, YaoY, WangSC, et al., 2013. Maneuver control strategies to maximize prediction errors in ballistic middle phase. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 36(4):1225-1234.

[34]GutmanS, 1979. On optimal guidance for homing missiles. Journal of Guidance and Control, 2(4):296-300.

[35]HanT, HuQL, ShinHS, et al., 2021. Sensor-based robust incremental three-dimensional guidance law with terminal angle constraint. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 44(11):2016-2030.

[36]HanT, ShinHS, HuQL, et al., 2022a. Differentiator-based incremental three-dimensional terminal angle guidance with enhanced robustness. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 58(5):4020-4032.

[37]HanT, HuQL, XinM, 2022b. Three-dimensional approach angle guidance under varying velocity and field-of-view limit without using line-of-sight rate. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 52(11):7148-7159.

[38]HassanL, SadatiSH, KarimiJ, 2013. Integrated fuzzy guidance law for high maneuvering targets based on proportional navigation guidance. Iranian Journal of Electrical & Electronic Engineering, 9(4):204-214.

[39]HuQL, HanT, XinM, 2018. New impact time and angle guidance strategy via virtual target approach. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 41(8):1755-1765.

[40]HuYD, GaoCS, LiJL, et al., 2021. Novel trajectory prediction algorithms for hypersonic gliding vehicles based on maneuver mode on-line identification and intent inference. Measurement Science and Technology, 32(11):115012.

[41]HuaWH, ChenXL, 2011. Nonlinear bounded-control differential game guidance law for variable-speed missiles. Control and Decision, 26(12):1886-1890 (in Chinese).

[42]HuaWH, LiuY, ChenXL, et al., 2011. Linear quadratic differential game guidance law with terminal constraints. Acta Armamentarii, 32(12):1448-1455 (in Chinese).

[43]HuaWH, MengQL, ZhangJP, et al., 2016. Differential game guidance law for dual and bounded controlled missiles. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 42(9):1851-1856 (in Chinese).

[44]HuiYL, NanY, ChenSD, et al., 2015. Research on cooperative multiple-missile intercepting strategy for near-space vehicles. Journal of Projectiles, Rockets, Missiles and Guidance, 35(5):149-154 (in Chinese).

[45]IzzoD, ÖztürkE, 2021. Real-time guidance for low-thrust transfers using deep neural networks. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 44(2):315-327.

[46]KumarA, OjhaA, PadhyPK, 2017. Anticipated trajectory based proportional navigation guidance scheme for intercepting high maneuvering targets. International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems, 15(3):1351-1361.

[47]LawsonRA, McDermottLC, 1987. Student understanding of the work-energy and impulse-momentum theorems. American Journal of Physics, 55(9):811-817.

[48]LiKB, LiangYG, SuWS, et al., 2018. Performance of 3D TPN against true-arbitrarily maneuvering target for exoatmospheric interception. Science China Technological Sciences, 61(8):1161-1174.

[49]LiQC, ZhangWS, HanG, et al., 2015. Finite time convergent wavelet neural network sliding mode control guidance law with impact angle constraint. International Journal of Automation and Computing, 12(6):588-599.

[50]LiQC, ZhangWS, HanG, et al., 2016. Fuzzy sliding mode control guidance law with terminal impact angle and acceleration constraints. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 27(3):664-679.

[51]LiWH, MengYS, 2020. Missile weapon system boost the development of war. Tactical Missile Technology, (4):161-166 (in Chinese).

[52]LiZJ, XiaYQ, SuCY, et al., 2015. Missile guidance law based on robust model predictive control using neural-network optimization. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 26(8):1803-1809.

[53]LinCL, ChenYY, 2000. Design of fuzzy logic guidance law against high-speed target. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 23(1):17-25.

[54]LiuDX, WangJL, XuK, et al., 2019. Task-driven relay assignment in distributed UAV communication networks. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 68(11):11003-11017.

[55]LiuSX, YanBB, ZhangT, et al., 2021. Guidance law with desired impact time and FOV constrained for antiship missiles based on equivalent sliding mode control. International Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 2021:9923332.

[56]LiuSX, YanBB, LiuRF, et al., 2022a. Cooperative guidance law for intercepting a hypersonic target with impact angle constraint. The Aeronautical Journal, 126(1300):1026-1044.

[57]LiuSX, YanBB, ZhangT, et al., 2022b. Coverage-based cooperative guidance law for intercepting hypersonic vehicles with overload constraint. Aerospace Science and Technology, 126:107651.

[58]LiuSX, YanBB, ZhangX, et al., 2022c. Fractional-order sliding mode guidance law for intercepting hypersonic vehicles. Aerospace, 9(2):53.

[59]LiuSX, WangYC, ZhuMJ, et al., 2022d. Research on differential game guidance law for intercepting hypersonic vehicles with small missile-to-target speed ratio. Air & Space Defense, 5(2):49-57 (in Chinese).

[60]LiuSX, YanBB, ZhangT, et al., 2022e. Three-dimensional cooperative guidance law for intercepting hypersonic targets. Aerospace Science and Technology, 129:107815.

[61]LiuSX, YanBB, ZhangT, et al., 2022f. Three-dimensional coverage-based cooperative guidance law with overload constraints to intercept a hypersonic vehicle. Aerospace Science and Technology, 130:107908.

[62]LiuYC, ZhuQD, FanX, 2023. Event-triggered adaptive fuzzy control for stochastic nonlinear time-delay systems. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 452:42-60.

[63]MishraSK, SarmaIG, SwamyKN, 1994. Performance evaluation of two fuzzy-logic-based homing guidance schemes. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 17(6):1389-1391.

[64]MitchellIM, BayenAM, TomlinCJ, 2005. A time-dependent Hamilton-Jacobi formulation of reachable sets for continuous dynamic games. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 50(7):947-957.

[65]NagappaR, 2015. Going too fast: time to ban hypersonic missile tests? An Indian response. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 71(5):9-12.

[66]NielsenJN, 1988. Missile Aerodynamics. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc., Reston, USA.

[67]OshmanY, RadDA, 2006. Differential-game-based guidance law using target orientation observations. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 42(1):‍316-326.

[68]ParkBG, KimTH, TahkMJ, 2013. Optimal impact angle control guidance law considering the seeker’s field-of-view limits. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 227(8):1347-1364.

[69]PastrickHL, SeltzerSM, WarrenME, 1981. Guidance laws for short-range tactical missiles. Journal of Guidance and Control, 4(2):98-108.

[70]RiazU, AminAA, TayyebM, 2022. Design of active fault-tolerant control system for air-fuel ratio control of internal combustion engines using fuzzy logic controller. Science Progress, 105(2):00368504221094723.

[71]SaylerKM, 2019. Hypersonic Weapons: Background and Issues for Congress. Congressional Research Service, USA. https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/R/R45811/19

[72]ShiL, ZhuCY, ZhaoL, et al., 2020. Fast Doppler shift acquisition method for hypersonic vehicle communications. IET Communications, 14(3):474-479.

[73]SongJH, SongSM, XuSL, 2017. Three-dimensional cooperative guidance law for multiple missiles with finite-time convergence. Aerospace Science and Technology, 67:193-205.

[74]SunJL, LiuCS, 2017. An overview on the adaptive dynamic programming based missile guidance law. Acta Automatica Sinica, 43(7):1101-1113 (in Chinese).

[75]SunJL, LiuCS, 2019. Distributed fuzzy adaptive backstepping optimal control for nonlinear multimissile guidance systems with input saturation. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 27(3):447-461.

[76]SziroczakD, SmithH, 2016. A review of design issues specific to hypersonic flight vehicles. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 84:1-28.

[77]TanSL, LeiHM, WangB, 2019. Cooperative guidance law for hypersonic targets with constrained impact angle. Transactions of Beijing Institute of Technology, 39(6):597-602 (in Chinese).

[78]TangJW, HuangZW, ZhuYD, et al., 2022. Neural network compensation control of magnetic levitation ball position based on fuzzy inference. Scientific Reports, 12(1):1795.

[79]WaldmannJ, 2002. Line-of-sight rate estimation and linearizing control of an imaging seeker in a tactical missile guided by proportional navigation. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 10(4):556-567.

[80]WangL, LiuK, YaoY, et al., 2022. A design approach for simultaneous cooperative interception based on area coverage optimization. Drones, 6(7):156.

[81]WangYL, TangSJ, ShangW, et al., 2018. Adaptive fuzzy sliding mode guidance law considering available acceleration and autopilot dynamics. International Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 2018:6081801.

[82]WeiXQ, YangJY, FanXR, 2021. Variational method-based distributed optimal guidance laws for multi-attackers’ simultaneous attack. Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control, 43(9):1868-1879.

[83]WeissM, ShimaT, 2019. Linear quadratic optimal control-based missile guidance law with obstacle avoidance. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 55(1):205-214.

[84]WilkeningD, 2019. Hypersonic weapons and strategic stability. Survival, 61(5):129-148.

[85]WilliamsonJ, WirtzJJ, 2021. Hypersonic or just hype? Assessing the Russian hypersonic weapons program. Comparative Strategy, 40(5):468-481.

[86]WorkRO, GrantG, 2019. Beating the Americans at Their Own Game: an Offset Strategy with Chinese Characteristics. Center for a New American Security, Washington, USA, p.195-260.

[87]WuG, ZhangK, 2021. A novel guidance law for intercepting a highly maneuvering target. International Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 2021:2326323.

[88]WuG, ZhangK, HanZ, 2022. Three-dimensional finite-time guidance law based on sliding mode adaptive RBF neural network against a highly manoeuvering target. The Aeronautical Journal, 126(1301):1124-1143.

[89]XieY, LiuLH, TangGJ, et al., 2011. Weaving maneuver trajectory design for hypersonic glide vehicles. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 32(12):2174-2181 (in Chinese).

[90]XuB, ShiZK, 2015. An overview on flight dynamics and control approaches for hypersonic vehicles. Science China Information Sciences, 58(7):1-19.

[91]YanBB, DaiP, LiuRF, et al., 2019. Adaptive super-twisting sliding mode control of variable sweep morphing aircraft. Aerospace Science and Technology, 92:198-210.

[92]YangB, JingWX, GaoCS, 2020. Three-dimensional cooperative guidance law for multiple missiles with impact angle constraint. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 31(6):1286-1296.

[93]YangCD, YangCC, 1996a. Analytical solution of 3D true proportional navigation. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 32(4):1509-1522.

[94]YangCD, YangCC, 1996b. Analytical solution of three-dimensional realistic true proportional navigation. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 19(3):569-577.

[95]YeJK, LeiHM, LiJ, 2017. Novel fractional order calculus extended PN for maneuvering targets. International Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 2017:5931967.

[96]YouH, ZhaoFJ, 2020. Distributed synergetic guidance law for multiple missiles with angle-of-attack constraint. The Aeronautical Journal, 124(1274):533-548.

[97]ZhangC, 2019. Interpretation of the UN report “hypersonic weapons–a challenge and opportunity for strategic arms control”. Tactical Missile Technology, (3):7-11 (in Chinese).

[98]ZhangJB, XiongJJ, LanXH, et al., 2022. Trajectory prediction of hypersonic glide vehicle based on empirical wavelet transform and attention convolutional long short-term memory network. IEEE Sensors Journal, 22(5):4601-4615.

[99]ZhangKQ, YangSC, 2018. Fast convergent nonsingular terminal sliding mode guidance law with impact angle constraint. The 37th Chinese Control Conference, p.2963-2968.

[100]ZhangTT, YanXT, HuangW, et al., 2021a. Design and analysis of the air-breathing aircraft with the full-body wave-ride performance. Aerospace Science and Technology, 119:107133.

[101]ZhangTT, YanXT, HuangW, et al., 2021b. Multidisciplinary design optimization of a wide speed range vehicle with waveride airframe and RBCC engine. Energy, 235:121386.

[102]ZhangX, YanJ, LiuSX, et al., 2022. Enhancing the take-off performance of hypersonic vehicles using the improved chimp optimisation algorithm. The Aeronautical Journal, in press.

[103]ZhangZH, MaKM, ZhangGP, et al., 2022. Virtual target approach-based optimal guidance law with both impact time and terminal angle constraints. Nonlinear Dynamics, 107(4):3521-3541.

[104]ZhaoBQ, DongXW, LiQD, et al., 2020. A combined guidance law for intercepting hypersonic large maneuvering targets. 2020 Chinese Automation Congress, p.1425-1430.

[105]ZhaoJ, ZhouR, JinXL, 2014. Progress in reentry trajectory planning for hypersonic vehicle. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 25(4):627-639.

[106]ZhaoJB, YangSX, 2017. Review of multi-missile cooperative guidance. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 38(1):020256 (in Chinese).

[107]ZhaoQL, ChenJ, DongXW, et al., 2016. Cooperative guidance law for heterogeneous missiles intercepting hypersonic weapon. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 37(3):936-948 (in Chinese).

[108]ZhaoT, 2015. Going too fast: time to ban hypersonic missile tests? A Chinese response. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 71(5):5-8.

[109]ZhongQ, ZhangB, BaoHM, et al., 2019. Analysis of pressure and flow compound control characteristics of an independent metering hydraulic system based on a two-level fuzzy controller. Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE A (Applied Physics & Engineering), 20(3):184-200.

[110]ZhouJ, WangY, ZhaoB, 2016. Impact-time-control guidance law for missile with time-varying velocity. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2016:7951923.

[111]ZhuCQ, 2021. Design of finite-time guidance law based on observer and head-pursuit theory. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 235(13):1791-1802.

[112]ZhuCQ, GuoZY, 2019. Design of head-pursuit guidance law based on backstepping sliding mode control. International Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 2019:8214042.

[113]ZhuCY, ShiL, LiXP, et al., 2018. Lock threshold deterioration induced by antenna vibration and signal coupling effects in hypersonic vehicle carrier tracking system of Ka band. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 31(4):776-781.

Open peer comments: Debate/Discuss/Question/Opinion

<1>

Please provide your name, email address and a comment





Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE, 38 Zheda Road, Hangzhou 310027, China
Tel: +86-571-87952783; E-mail: cjzhang@zju.edu.cn
Copyright © 2000 - 2024 Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE