CLC number:
On-line Access: 2023-08-18
Received: 2022-09-04
Revision Accepted: 2023-03-28
Crosschecked: 2023-08-18
Cited: 0
Clicked: 528
Guosong WU, Longjiang SHEN, Yuan YAO, Wensheng SONG, Jingchun HUANG. Determination of the dynamic characteristics of locomotive drive systems under re-adhesion conditions using wheel slip controller[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University Science A,in press.Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering,in press.https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.A2300158 @article{title="Determination of the dynamic characteristics of locomotive drive systems under re-adhesion conditions using wheel slip controller", %0 Journal Article TY - JOUR
黏着控制对机车再黏着性能及驱动系统动态特性影响机构:1西南交通大学,牵引动力重点实验室,中国成都,610031;2株洲电力机车有限公司,转向架研发部,中国株洲,412001;3株洲电力机车有限公司,大功率交流传动电力机车系统集成国家重点实验室,中国株洲,412001;4西南交通大学,电气工程学院,中国成都,610031 目的:大功率重载机车采用轮对空心轴架悬驱动系统降低轮轨动作用力,但采用六连杆空心轴联轴器导致驱动系统的扭转刚度相对较小,对轮对驱动系统黏滑振动不利。本文旨在研究黏着条件改变时,黏着控制对驱动系统动态特性以及机车再黏着性能的影响,从黏着控制与驱动系统参数合理匹配的角度提出提高机车黏着利用的措施。 创新点:1.通过建立机车牵引与黏着控制联合仿真模型,研究黏着控制对机车再黏着性能以及驱动系统黏滑振动影响;2.研究黏着控制器参数与机车驱动系统参数匹配不合理时导致的机电耦合振动。 方法:采用联合仿真方法,建立SIMPACK-MATLAB/SIMULINK联合仿真模型。在SIMPACK中建立包含完整驱动系统、齿轮传动系统、钩缓装置和轮轨蠕滑负斜率特性的机车牵引列车模型,在MATLAB/SIMULINK中建立黏着控制模型,通过动力学仿真研究黏着控制对驱动系统动态特性以及机车再黏着性能的影响。 结论:1.驱动系统发生黏滑振动时,轮对纵向振动与扭转振动通过切向力耦合;2.减小平均滑动率(再黏着控制)和动态滑动率(增加驱动系统刚度)是抑制驱动系统黏滑振动的有效措施;3.机车驱动系统与黏着控制需合理匹配,否则会导致驱动系统机电耦合振动。 关键词组: Darkslateblue:Affiliate; Royal Blue:Author; Turquoise:Article
Reference[1]FröhlingR, SpangenbergU, ReitmannE, 2019. Root cause analysis of locomotive wheel tread polygonisation. Wear, 432-433:102911. [2]HubbardPD, WardC, DixonR, et al., 2014. Models for estimation of creep forces in the wheel/rail contact under varying adhesion levels. Vehicle System Dynamics, 52(S1):370-386. [3]HussainI, MeiTX, RitchingsRT, 2013. Estimation of wheel–rail contact conditions and adhesion using the multiple model approach. Vehicle System Dynamics, 51(1):32-53. [4]KalousekJ, JohnsonKL, 1992. An investigation of short pitch wheel and rail corrugations on the Vancouver mass transit system. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, 206(2):127-135. [5]LewisR, Dwyer-JoyceRS, LewisSR, et al., 2012. Tribology of the wheel-rail contact: the effect of third body materials. International Journal of Railway Technology, 1(1):167-194. [6]MalvezziM, PugiL, PapiniS, et al., 2013. Identification of a wheel‒rail adhesion coefficient from experimental data during braking tests. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, 227(2):128-139. [7]MoreaD, EliaS, BoccalettiC, et al., 2021. Improvement of energy savings in electric railways using coasting technique. Energies, 14(23):8120. [8]NakazawaSI, HijikataD, 2017. Wheel slide protection system by the use of the tangential force in the macro slip area. Quarterly Report of RTRI, 58(3):196-203. [9]OlofssonU, SundvallK, 2004. Influence of leaf, humidity and applied lubrication on friction in the wheel-rail contact: pin-on-disc experiments. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, 218(3):235-242. [10]OnatA, VoltrP, 2020. Velocity measurement-based friction estimation for railway vehicles running on adhesion limit: swarm intelligence-based multiple models approach. Journal of Intelligent Transportation System, 24(1):93-107. [11]PolachO, 2001. Influence of locomotive tractive effort on the forces between wheel and rail. Vehicle System Dynamics, 35(Supplement):7-22. [12]PolachO, 2005. Creep forces in simulations of traction vehicles running on adhesion limit. Wear, 258(7-8):992-1000. [13]ShiZY, WangKY, GuoLR, et al., 2017. Effect of arc surfaces friction coefficient on coupler stability in heavy haul locomotives: simulation and experiment. Vehicle System Dynamics, 55(9):1368-1383. [14]SpiryaginM, ColeC, SunYQ, 2014. Adhesion estimation and its implementation for traction control of locomotives. International Journal of Rail Transportation, 2(3):187-204. [15]VollebregtEAH, 2014. Numerical modeling of measured railway creep versus creep-force curves with CONTACT. Wear, 314(1-2):87-95. [16]WangWJ, ShenP, SongJH, et al., 2011. Experimental study on adhesion behavior of wheel/rail under dry and water conditions. Wear, 271(9-10):2699-2705. [17]WuGS, ShenLJ, YaoY, 2023. Investigating the re-adhesion performance of locomotives with bogie frame suspension driving system. International Journal of Rail Transportation, 11(2):267-288. [18]YaoY, ZhangHJ, LiYM, et al., 2011. The dynamic study of locomotives under saturated adhesion. Vehicle System Dynamic, 49(8):1321-1338. [19]ZhangWH, ChenJZ, WuXJ, et al., 2002. Wheel/rail adhesion and analysis by using full scale roller rig. Wear, 253(1-2):82-88. [20]ZhaoXN, ChenGX, LvJZ, et al., 2019. Study on the mechanism for the wheel polygonal wear of high-speed trains in terms of the frictional self-excited vibration theory. Wear, 426-427:1820-1827. [21]ZhaoY, LiangB, 2013. Re-adhesion control for a railway single wheelset test rig based on the behaviour of the traction motor. Vehicle System Dynamics, 51(8):1173-1185. Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE, 38 Zheda Road, Hangzhou
310027, China
Tel: +86-571-87952783; E-mail: cjzhang@zju.edu.cn Copyright © 2000 - 2024 Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE |
Open peer comments: Debate/Discuss/Question/Opinion
<1>