CLC number:
On-line Access: 2022-02-17
Received: 2021-05-14
Revision Accepted: 2021-10-15
Crosschecked: 0000-00-00
Cited: 0
Clicked: 2761
Citations: Bibtex RefMan EndNote GB/T7714
Yingyi GENG, Xintong WU, Haipeng LIU, Dingchang ZHENG, Ling XIA. Index of microcirculatory resistance: state-of-the-art and potential applications in computational simulation of coronary artery disease[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University Science B,in press.Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering,in press.https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.B2100425 @article{title="Index of microcirculatory resistance: state-of-the-art and potential applications in computational simulation of coronary artery disease", %0 Journal Article TY - JOUR
微循环阻力指数(IMR):冠状动脉疾病计算仿真的最新和潜在应用关键词组: Darkslateblue:Affiliate; Royal Blue:Author; Turquoise:Article
Reference[1]AarnoudseW, FearonWF, ManoharanG, et al., 2004a. Epicardial stenosis severity does not affect minimal microcirculatory resistance. Circulation, 110(15):2137-2142. [2]AarnoudseW, van den BergP, van de VosseF, et al., 2004b. Myocardial resistance assessed by guidewire-based pressure-temperature measurement: in vitro validation. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 62(1):56-63. [3]AhmedB, 2014. New insights into the pathophysiology, classification, and diagnosis of coronary microvascular dysfunction. Coron Artery Dis, 25(5):439-449. [4]AhnSG, HungOY, LeeJW, et al., 2016. Combination of the thermodilution-derived index of microcirculatory resistance and coronary flow reserve is highly predictive of microvascular obstruction on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. JACC Cardiovasc Interv, 9(8):793-801. [5]AiH, FengYD, GongYJ, et al., 2020. Coronary angiography-derived index of microvascular resistance. Front Physiol, 11:605356. [6]CamiciPG, D'AmatiG, RimoldiO, 2015. Coronary microvascular dysfunction: mechanisms and functional assessment. Nat Rev Cardiol, 12(1):48-62. [7]CarpenterHJ, GholipourA, GhayeshMH, et al., 2020. A review on the biomechanics of coronary arteries. Int J Eng Sci, 147:103201. [8]CarrickD, HaigC, AhmedN, et al., 2016. Comparative prognostic utility of indexes of microvascular function alone or in combination in patients with an acute ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction. Circulation, 134(23):1833-1847. [9]ChamuleauSAJ, SiebesM, MeuwissenM, et al., 2003. Association between coronary lesion severity and distal microvascular resistance in patients with coronary artery disease. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, 285(5):H2194-H2200. [10]ClarkeJRD, KennedyR, LauFD, et al., 2020. Invasive evaluation of the microvasculature in acute myocardial infarction: coronary flow reserve versus the index of microcirculatory resistance. J Clin Med, 9(1):86. [11]CoverstoneE, ShapiroR, SinghJ, 2015. Current developments and future applications of intracoronary hemodynamics. Coron Artery Dis, 26(5):448-458. [12]CuissetT, QuiliciJ, PankertM, et al., 2011. Usefulness of index of microcirculatory resistance to detect microvascular dysfunction as a potential mechanism of stress-induced cardiomyopathy (tako-tsubo syndrome). Int J Cardiol, 153(3):E51-E53. [13]de WaardGA, TeunissenPF, KnaapenP, et al., 2015. TCT-302 comparison between thermodilution and doppler flow velocity derived quantification of microvascular function after acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol, 66(15):B119-B120. [14]de WaardGA, HollanderMR, RuiterD, et al., 2020. Downstream influence of coronary stenoses on microcirculatory remodeling: a histopathology study. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, 40(1):230-238. [15]di MarioC, StrikwerdaS, GilR, et al., 1994. Response of conductance and resistance coronary vessels to scalar concentrations of acetylcholine: assessment with quantitative angiography and intracoronary doppler echography in 29 patients with coronary artery disease. Am Heart J, 127(3):514-531. [16]DongJL, SunZH, InthavongK, et al., 2015. Fluid-structure interaction analysis of the left coronary artery with variable angulation. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng, 18(14):1500-1508. [17]Echavarría-PintoM, van de HoefTP, NijjerS, et al., 2017. Influence of the amount of myocardium subtended to a coronary stenosis on the index of microcirculatory resistance. Implications for the invasive assessment of microcirculatory function in ischaemic heart disease. EuroIntervention, 13(8):944-952. [18]EshtehardiP, LukeJ, McDanielMC, et al., 2011. Intravascular imaging tools in the cardiac catheterization laboratory: comprehensive assessment of anatomy and physiology. J Cardiovasc Trans Res, 4(4):393-403. [19]FearonWF, KobayashiY, 2017. Invasive assessment of the coronary microvasculature: the index of microcirculatory resistance. Circ Cardiovasc Interv, 10(12):e005361. [20]FearonWF, BalsamLB, FarouqueHMO, et al., 2003. Novel index for invasively assessing the coronary microcirculation. Circulation, 107(25):3129-3132. [21]FearonWF, AarnoudseW, PijlsNHJ, et al., 2004. Microvascular resistance is not influenced by epicardial coronary artery stenosis severity: experimental validation. Circulation, 109(19):2269-2272. [22]FearonWF, HirohataA, NakamuraM, et al., 2006. Discordant changes in epicardial and microvascular coronary physiology after cardiac transplantation: physiologic investigation for transplant arteriopathy II (PITA II) study. J Heart Lung Transplant, 25(7):765-771. [23]FearonWF, LowAF, YongAS, et al., 2013. Prognostic value of the index of microcirculatory resistance measured after primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Circulation, 127(24):2436-2441. [24]FujiiK, KawasakiD, OkaK, et al., 2011. The impact of pravastatin pre-treatment on periprocedural microcirculatory damage in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. JACC Cardiovasc Interv, 4(5):513-520. [25]HasanM, RubensteinDA, YinW, 2013. Effects of cyclic motion on coronary blood flow. J Biomech Eng, 135(12):121002. [26]HellerLI, SilverKH, VillegasBJ, et al., 1994. Blood flow velocity in the right coronary artery: assessment before and after angioplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol, 24(4):1012-1017. [27]HerrmannJ, KaskiJC, LermanA, 2012. Coronary microvascular dysfunction in the clinical setting: from mystery to reality. Eur Heart J, 33(22):2771-2783. [28]JavadzadeganA, YongASC, ChangM, et al., 2017. Haemodynamic assessment of human coronary arteries is affected by degree of freedom of artery movement. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng, 20(3):260-272. [29]JiaoY, WangJH, YangX, et al., 2021. Evaluation of the prognostic ability of serum uric acid for elderly acute coronary syndrome patients with diabetes mellitus: a prospective cohort study. J Zhejiang Univ-Sci B (Biomed & Biotechnol), 22(10):856-865. [30]KarmonikC, Müller-EschnerM, PartoviS, et al., 2013. Computational fluid dynamics investigation of chronic aortic dissection hemodynamics versus normal aorta. Vasc Endovascular Surg, 47(8):625-631. [31]KelseyLJ, MillerK, NormanPE, et al., 2016. The influence of downstream branching arteries on upstream haemodynamics. J Biomech, 49(13):3090-3096. [32]KernMJ, SamadyH, 2010. Current concepts of integrated coronary physiology in the catheterization laboratory. J Am Coll Cardiol, 55(3):173-185. [33]KitabataH, KuboT, IshibashiK, et al., 2013. Prognostic value of microvascular resistance index immediately after primary percutaneous coronary intervention on left ventricular remodeling in patients with reperfused anterior acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. JACC Cardiovasc Interv, 6(10):1046-1054. [34]KnaapenP, CamiciPG, MarquesKM, et al., 2009. Coronary microvascular resistance: methods for its quantification in humans. Basic Res Cardiol, 104(5):485-498. [35]KonstantinouK, KaramasisGV, DaviesJR, et al., 2020. Absolute microvascular resistance by continuous thermodilution predicts microvascular dysfunction after ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Int J Cardiol, 319:7-13. [36]LadisaJFJr, OlsonLE, MolthenRC, et al., 2005. Alterations in wall shear stress predict sites of neointimal hyperplasia after stent implantation in rabbit iliac arteries. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, 288(5):H2465-H2475. [37]LaylandJ, MacisaacAI, BurnsAT, et al., 2012. When collateral supply is accounted for epicardial stenosis does not increase microvascular resistance. Circ Cardiovasc Interv, 5(1):97-102. [38]LeeJ, SmithNP, 2012. The multi-scale modelling of coronary blood flow. Ann Biomed Eng, 40(11):2399-2413. [39]LeeJM, LaylandJ, JungJH, et al., 2015. Integrated physiologic assessment of ischemic heart disease in real-world practice using index of microcirculatory resistance and fractional flow reserve: insights from the international index of microcirculatory resistance registry. Circ Cardiovasc Interv, 8(11):e002857. [40]LeeJM, DohJH, NamCW, et al., 2018. Functional approach for coronary artery disease: filling the gap between evidence and practice. Korean Circ J, 48(3):179-190. [41]LeeSH, LeeJM, ParkJ, et al., 2020. Prognostic implications of resistive reserve ratio in patients with coronary artery disease. J Am Heart Assoc, 9(8):e015846. [42]LempelM, FrishmanWH, 2019. Cardiac applications of dual-energy computed tomography. Cardiol Rev, 27(4):208-210. [43]LiY, ZhangXG, DaiQM, et al., 2020. Coronary flow reserve and microcirculatory resistance in patients with coronary tortuosity and without atherosclerosis. J Int Med Res, 48(9):300060520955060. [44]LiYC, WangKQ, LiQ, et al., 2020. Biological pacemaker: from biological experiments to computational simulation. J Zhejiang Univ-Sci B (Biomed & Biotechnol), 21(7):524-536. [45]LiangX, XenosM, AlemuY, et al., 2013. Biomechanical factors in coronary vulnerable plaque risk of rupture: intravascular ultrasound-based patient-specific fluid-structure interaction studies. Coron Artery Dis, 24(2):75-87. [46]LinC, ZhangP, XueYJ, et al., 2017. Link of renal microcirculatory dysfunction to increased coronary microcirculatory resistance in hypertensive patients. Cardiol J, 24(6):623-632. [47]LinE, AlessioA, 2009. What are the basic concepts of temporal, contrast, and spatial resolution in cardiac CT? J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr, 3(6):403-408. [48]LiuHP, GongYL, LengXY, et al., 2018. Estimating current and long-term risks of coronary artery in silico by fractional flow reserve, wall shear stress and low-density lipoprotein filtration rate. Biomed Phys Eng Express, 4(2):025006. [49]LiuHP, OuSX, LiuPL, et al., 2020a. Effect of microcirculatory resistance on coronary blood flow and instantaneous wave-free ratio: a computational study. Comput Methods Programs Biomed, 196:105632. [50]LiuHP, WangDF, LengXY, et al., 2020b. State-of-the-art computational models of circle of willis with physiological applications: a review. IEEE Access, 8:156261-156273. [51]LongM, HuangZB, ZhuangXD, et al., 2017. Association of inflammation and endothelial dysfunction with coronary microvascular resistance in patients with cardiac syndrome X. Arq Bras Cardiol, 109(5):397-403. [52]LuoCF, LongM, HuX, et al., 2014. Thermodilution-derived coronary microvascular resistance and flow reserve in patients with cardiac syndrome X. Circ Cardiovasc Interv, 7(1):43-48. [53]MangiacapraF, PeaceAJ, di SerafinoL, et al., 2013. Intracoronary enalaprilat to reduce microvascular damage during percutaneous coronary intervention (ProMicro) study. J Am Coll Cardiol, 61(6):615-621. [54]MartinezGJ, YongASC, FearonWF, et al., 2015. The index of microcirculatory resistance in the physiologic assessment of the coronary microcirculation. Coron Artery Dis, 26(S1):e15-e26. [55]McGeochRJ, OldroydKG, 2008. Pharmacological options for inducing maximal hyperaemia during studies of coronary physiology. Cathet Cardiovasc Interv, 71(2):198-204. [56]MeierB, LuethyP, FinciL, et al., 1987. Coronary wedge pressure in relation to spontaneously visible and recruitable collaterals. Circulation, 75(5):906-913. [57]MelikianN, VercauterenS, FearonWF, et al., 2010. Quantitative assessment of coronary microvascular function in patients with and without epicardial atherosclerosis. EuroIntervention, 5(8):939-945. [58]MezaD, RubensteinDA, YinW, 2018. A fluid-structure interaction model of the left coronary artery. J Biomech Eng, 140(12):121006. [59]MorrisPD, NarracottA, von Tengg-KobligkH, et al., 2016. Computational fluid dynamics modelling in cardiovascular medicine. Heart, 102(1):18-28. [60]MuraiT, LeeT, YonetsuT, et al., 2013. Variability of microcirculatory resistance index and its relationship with fractional flow reserve in patients with intermediate coronary artery lesions. Circ J, 77(7):1769-1776. [61]MuraiT, LeeT, KanajiY, et al., 2016. The influence of elective percutaneous coronary intervention on microvascular resistance: a serial assessment using the index of microcirculatory resistance. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, 311(3):H520-H531. [62]MuraiT, KanajiY, YonetsuT, et al., 2017. Preprocedural fractional flow reserve and microvascular resistance predict increased hyperaemic coronary flow after elective percutaneous coronary intervention. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 89(2):233-242. [63]MuraiT, YonetsuT, KanajiY, et al., 2018. Prognostic value of the index of microcirculatory resistance after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 92(6):1063-1074. [64]NgMKC, YeungAC, FearonWF, 2006. Invasive assessment of the coronary microcirculation: superior reproducibility and less hemodynamic dependence of index of microcirculatory resistance compared with coronary flow reserve. Circulation, 113(17):2054-2061. [65]NgMKC, YongASC, HoM, et al., 2012. The index of microcirculatory resistance predicts myocardial infarction related to percutaneous coronary intervention. Circ Cardiovasc Interv, 5(4):515-522. [66]ParkSD, BaekYS, LeeMJ, et al., 2016. Comprehensive assessment of microcirculation after primary percutaneous intervention in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: insight from thermodilution-derived index of microcirculatory resistance and coronary flow reserve. Coron Artery Dis, 27(1):34-39. [67]PatelB, FisherM, 2010. Therapeutic advances in myocardial microvascular resistance: unravelling the enigma. Pharmacol Ther, 127(2):131-147. [68]PennatiG, CorsiniC, HsiaTY, et al., 2013. Computational fluid dynamics models and congenital heart diseases. Front Pediatr, 1:4. [69]PijlsNHJ, de BruyneB, SmithL, et al., 2002. Coronary thermodilution to assess flow reserve: validation in humans. Circulation, 105(21):2482-2486. [70]RadaelliAG, AugsburgerL, CebralJR, et al., 2008. Reproducibility of haemodynamical simulations in a subject-specific stented aneurysm model—a report on the Virtual Intracranial Stenting Challenge 2007. J Biomech, 41(10):2069-2081. [71]RampatR, WilliamsT, Hildick-SmithD, et al., 2019. The effect of elective implantation of the ABSORB bioresorbable vascular scaffold on coronary microcirculation: serial assessment using the index of microcirculatory resistance. Microcirculation, 26(3):e12521. [72]ResarJR, PrewittKC, WolffMR, et al., 1994. Coronary angioplasty through a new 6 french guiding catheter. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn, 32(3):268-273. [73]SambucetiG, MarzilliM, FedeleS, et al., 2001. Paradoxical increase in microvascular resistance during tachycardia downstream from a severe stenosis in patients with coronary artery disease: reversal by angioplasty. Circulation, 103(19):2352-2360. [74]SerruysPW, di MarioC, MeneveauN, et al., 1993. Intracoronary pressure and flow velocity with sensor-tip guidewires: a new methodologic approach for assessment of coronary hemodynamics before and after coronary interventions. Am J Cardiol, 71(14):D41-D53. [75]SinclairMD, LeeJ, CooksonAN, et al., 2015. Measurement and modeling of coronary blood flow. WIREs Syst Biol Med, 7(6):335-356. [76]SmithNP, 2004. A computational study of the interaction between coronary blood flow and myocardial mechanics. Physiol Meas, 25(4):863-877. [77]SolbergOG, RagnarssonA, KvarsnesA, et al., 2014. Reference interval for the index of coronary microvascular resistance. EuroIntervention, 9(9):1069-1075. [78]TebaldiM, LeoneAM, BiscagliaS, et al., 2020. Index of microcirculatory resistance assessment in patients with new diagnosis of left ventricular dilatation without significant coronary artery lesions: IMPAIRED pilot trial. Eur J Heart Fail, 22(3):561-563. [79]TescheC, de CeccoCN, AlbrechtMH, et al., 2017. Coronary CT angiography-derived fractional flow reserve. Radiology, 285(1):17-33. [80]VisMA, SipkemaP, WesterhofN, 1995. Modeling pressure-area relations of coronary blood vessels embedded in cardiac muscle in diastole and systole. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, 268(6):H2531-H2543. [81]WilliamsRP, de WaardGA, de SilvaK, et al., 2018. Doppler versus thermodilution-derived coronary microvascular resistance to predict coronary microvascular dysfunction in patients with acute myocardial infarction or stable angina pectoris. Am J Cardiol, 121(1):1-8. [82]WuZH, LiuYL, TongL, et al., 2021. Current progress of computational modeling for guiding clinical atrial fibrillation ablation. J Zhejiang Univ-Sci B (Biomed & Biotechnol), 22(10):805-817. [83]YongA, HoM, ShahM, et al., 2011. The index of microcirculatory resistance predicts myocardial infarction related to percutaneous coronary intervention. Heart Lung Circ, 20(S2):S3. [84]YongAS, LaylandJ, FearonWF, et al., 2013. Calculation of the index of microcirculatory resistance without coronary wedge pressure measurement in the presence of epicardial stenosis. JACC Cardiovasc Interv, 6(1):53-58. [85]YongASC, HoM, ShahMG, et al., 2012. Coronary microcirculatory resistance is independent of epicardial stenosis. Circ Cardiovasc Interv, 5(1):103-108. [86]YouW, YangZJ, YeF, 2019. Value of index of microcirculatory resistance for early prediction of periprocedural myocardial microcirculatory injury after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with coronary heart disease. Chin J Cardiol, 47(11):894-900 (in Chinese). Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE, 38 Zheda Road, Hangzhou
310027, China
Tel: +86-571-87952783; E-mail: cjzhang@zju.edu.cn Copyright © 2000 - 2024 Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE |
Open peer comments: Debate/Discuss/Question/Opinion
<1>