Abstract: We investigate the aerodynamic performance and flow field synergy of an externally tilted hex-rotor unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) in hovering mode, aiming to enhance its hovering efficiency through tailored flow interactions. Experimental measurements and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations are combined to examine the effects of rotor spacing ratio (i=0.50–0.83) and tilt angle (θ=0°–40°) on thrust, power consumption, figure of merit (FM), and power loading (PL), with particular emphasis on the underlying aerodynamic coupling mechanisms. The results demonstrate that the optimal configuration (i=0.56, θ=24°) achieves a 5.43% thrust increase, a 2.73% power reduction, an 11.15% improvement in FM, and a 3.77% enhancement in PL compared to a conventional planar configuration. Flow field analyses reveal that moderate tilting (θ=24°) promotes downwash convergence and strengthens vortex coupling, thereby increasing the effective flow velocity while minimizing the inter-rotor turbulent interference. Furthermore, the spacing ratio of i=0.56 effectively balances the reduction of detrimental flow interference with the promotion of beneficial flow interactions, as evidenced by stabilized primary vortex structures and constrained recirculation zones in the CFD simulations. This work highlights how the aerodynamic optimization of non-planar rotor configurations is critically dependent on the synergistic control of tilt-induced flow deflection and spacing-dependent interference, and establishes a theoretical framework for understanding multi-rotor flow dynamics; as such, the findings may aid the design of efficient rotor systems for UAVs.

具有外偏转构型的六旋翼飞行器悬停气动优化

[1]Arellano-QuintanaVM, Portilla-FloresEA, Merchán-CruzEA, 2018. Multi-objective design optimization of a hexa-rotor with disturbance rejection capability using an evolutionary algorithm. IEEE Access, 6:69064-69074.

[2]BanguraM, MelegaM, NaldiR, et al., 2016. Aerodynamics of rotor blades for quadrotors. arXiv:1601.00733.

[3]BohorquezF, RankinsF, BaederJD, et al., 2003. Hover performance of rotor blades at low Reynolds numbers for rotary wing micro air vehicles. An experimental and CFD study. 21st AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, p.2003-3930.

[4]CernyM, BreitsamterC, 2020. Investigation of small-scale propellers under non-axial inflow conditions. Aerospace Science and Technology, 106:106048.

[5]ChenK, ShiZW, TongSX, et al., 2019. Aerodynamic interference test of quad tilt rotor aircraft in wind tunnel. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 233(12):5553-5566.

[6]DetersRW, KleinkeS, SeligMS, 2017. Static testing of propulsion elements for small multirotor unmanned aerial vehicles. 35th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, p.3743.

[7]FrachettiMD, BernerJ, LiuXY, et al., 2024. Large-scale medieval urbanism traced by UAV–lidar in highland Central Asia. Nature, 634(8036):1118-1124.

[8]Garofano-SoldadoA, Sanchez-CuevasPJ, HerediaG, et al., 2022. Numerical-experimental evaluation and modelling of aerodynamic ground effect for small-scale tilted propellers at low Reynolds numbers. Aerospace Science and Technology, 126:107625.

[9]Garofano-SoldadoA, HerediaG, OlleroA, 2023. Aerodynamic interactions of non-planar rotor pairs and model derivation in ground approach. Aerospace Science and Technology, 142:108672.

[10]GerdroodbaryMB, ShiryanpoorI, SalavatidezfouliS, et al., 2024. Optimizing aerodynamic stability in compressible flow around a vibrating cylinder with deep reinforcement learning. Physics of Fluids, 36(12):124143.

[11]IbukiT, YoshiokaH, SampeiM, 2022. Robust pose tracking control for a fully-actuated hexarotor UAV based on Gaussian processes. SICE Journal of Control, Measurement, and System Integration, 15(2):201-210.

[12]JaroslawskiT, ForteM, MoschettaJM, et al., 2022. Characterisation of boundary layer transition over a low Reynolds number rotor. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, 130:110485.

[13]JiangN, WangKR, PengXK, et al., 2023. Anti-UAV: a large-scale benchmark for vision-based UAV tracking. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 25:486-500.

[14]LeiY, JiYX, WangCW, 2018. Optimization of aerodynamic performance for co-axial rotors with different rotor spacings. International Journal of Micro Air Vehicles, 10(4):362-369.

[15]LeiY, WangJD, YangWJ, 2021. Aerodynamic performance of a coaxial hex-rotor MAV in hover. Aerospace, 8(12):378.

[16]LiCZ, XueC, BaiY, 2019. Experimental investigation on aerodynamics of nonplanar rotor pairs in a multi-rotor UAV. 14th IEEE Conference on Industrial Electronics and Applications, p.911-915.

[17]LuanCF, LeiY, 2025. Aerodynamic study of dihedral angle configurations on a hexacopter during horizontal airflow disturbances. Physics of Fluids, 37(10):105108.

[18]LuoJL, ZhuLF, YanGR, 2015. Novel quadrotor forward-flight model based on wake interference. AIAA Journal, 53(12):3522-3533.

[19]LuoYW, AiTF, HeYH, et al., 2023. Numerical investigation on unsteady characteristics of ducted fans in ground effect. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 36(9):79-95.

[20]MaistoG, GarofanoA, AcanforaV, et al., 2025. Redesigning UAV vertical tail structures with lightweight eco-friendly carbon-reinforced polymers: a generative design-based approach. Journal of Composites Science, 9(10):517.

[21]MarrisE, 2013. Drones in science: fly, and bring me data. Nature, 498(7453):156-158.

[22]MenterF, KuntzM, LangtryRB, 2003. Ten years of industrial experience with the SST turbulence model. In: HanjalićK, Nagano Y, Tummers MJ (Eds.), Turbulence, Heat and Mass Transfer 4. Begell House, Inc., Turkey, p.625-632.

[23]MuZH, QinY, YuCC, et al., 2023. Adaptive cropping shallow attention network for defect detection of bridge girder steel using unmanned aerial vehicle images. Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE A, 24(3):243-256.

[24]PiccininiR, TugnoliM, ZanottiA, 2020. Numerical investigation of the rotor-rotor aerodynamic interaction for eVTOL aircraft configurations. Energies, 13(22):5995.

[25]PrabhuA, LiuX, SpasojevicI, et al., 2024. UAVs for forestry: metric-semantic mapping and diameter estimation with autonomous aerial robots. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 208:111050.

[26]RostamiM, FarajollahiAH, 2021. Aerodynamic performance of mutual interaction tandem propellers with ducted UAV. Aerospace Science and Technology, 108:106399.

[27]RussellC, ConleyS, 2020. The multirotor test bed—a new NASA test capability for advanced VTOL rotorcraft configurations. Proceedings of the Vertical Flight Society 76th Annual Forum, p.1-12.

[28]SheidaniA, SalavatidezfouliS, StabileG, et al., 2023. Assessment of icing effects on the wake shed behind a vertical axis wind turbine. Physics of Fluids, 35(9):095135.

[29]SinaN, AmiriP, DaneshM, 2021. Optimal path planning and control of a hexarotor with mass uncertainty in the presence of dynamic obstacles and wind using sliding mode and adaptive PSO algorithm. 29th Iranian Conference on Electrical Engineering, p.695-701.

[30]SuJY, ZhuXY, LiSH, et al., 2023. AI meets UAVs: a survey on AI empowered UAV perception systems for precision agriculture. Neurocomputing, 518:242-270.

[31]WangYT, SuZ, BenslimaneA, et al., 2024. Collaborative honeypot defense in UAV networks: a learning-based game approach. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, 19:1963-1978.

[32]WangZY, HenricksQ, ZhuangM, et al., 2019. Impact of rotor–airframe orientation on the aerodynamic and aeroacoustic characteristics of small unmanned aerial systems. Drones, 3(3):56.

[33]YangCS, YangZ, 2017. Adaptive command filtered backstepping trajectory tracking control of hexarotor UAV. Proceedings of the International Conference on Applied Mathematics, Modelling and Statistics Application, p.403-409.

[34]YaoC, KrieglsteinJ, JanschekK, 2018. Modeling and sliding mode control of a fully-actuated multirotor with tilted propellers. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 51(22):115-120.

Similar articles