Full Text:
<2626>
CLC number: TN919.8
On-line Access:
Received: 2005-12-02
Revision Accepted: 2006-02-28
Crosschecked: 0000-00-00
Cited: 4
Clicked: 4877
Video over IP using standard-compatible multiple description coding: an IETF proposal
| |||||||||||||
Vitali Andrea L., Borneo Antonio, Fumagalli Marco, Rinaldo Roberto. Video over IP using standard-compatible multiple description coding: an IETF proposal[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University Science A, 2006, 7(5): 668-676.
@article{title="Video over IP using standard-compatible multiple description coding: an IETF proposal",
author="Vitali Andrea L., Borneo Antonio, Fumagalli Marco, Rinaldo Roberto",
journal="Journal of Zhejiang University Science A",
volume="7",
number="5",
pages="668-676",
year="2006",
publisher="Zhejiang University Press & Springer",
doi="10.1631/jzus.2006.A0668"
}
%0 Journal Article
%T Video over IP using standard-compatible multiple description coding: an IETF proposal
%A Vitali Andrea L.
%A Borneo Antonio
%A Fumagalli Marco
%A Rinaldo Roberto
%J Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE A
%V 7
%N 5
%P 668-676
%@ 1673-565X
%D 2006
%I Zhejiang University Press & Springer
%DOI 10.1631/jzus.2006.A0668
TY - JOUR
T1 - Video over IP using standard-compatible multiple description coding: an IETF proposal
A1 - Vitali Andrea L.
A1 - Borneo Antonio
A1 - Fumagalli Marco
A1 - Rinaldo Roberto
J0 - Journal of Zhejiang University Science A
VL - 7
IS - 5
SP - 668
EP - 676
%@ 1673-565X
Y1 - 2006
PB - Zhejiang University Press & Springer
ER -
DOI - 10.1631/jzus.2006.A0668
Abstract: Standard-compatible multiple description coding (MDC) and layered coding (LC) are efficient ways to ensure erasure resilient, scalable transmission of encoded multimedia sources via RTP, allowing a gradual degradation of the application quality with increasing packet loss rate and decreasing bandwidth/throughput on the network. In this paper we review the standard-compatible framework proposed to IETF. Alternative techniques such as robust source coding and channel coding techniques (ARQ: automatic repeat request, FEC: forward error correction) are presented; their integration into the proposed framework is also discussed. The performances of MDC and LC either coupled with channel coding or not, are summarized by reference to current literature. Typical cases and examples are illustrated.
[1] Bernardini, R., Durigon, M., Rinaldo, R., Zontone, P., Vitali, A., 2004. Multiple Description Coding of Video Streams Using Frames and the H.264/AVC Standard. Proc. ICIP 2004. Singapore.
[2] Bernardini, R., Durigon, M., Rinaldo, R., Vitali, A., 2005. Comparison between Multiple Description and Single Description Video Coding with Forward Error Correction. MMSP.
[3] Franchi, N., Fumagalli, M., Lancini, R., 2002. Flexible Redundancy Insertion in a Polyphase Down-Sampling Multiple Description Image Coding. Proc. ICME 2002. Lausanne, Switzerland, p.26-29.
[4] Franchi, N., Fumagalli, M., Lancini, R., Tubaro, S., 2005. Multiple description video coding for scalable and robust transmission over IP. IEEE Trans. on CSVT, 15(3):321-334.
[5] Gallant, M., Kossentini, F., 2001. Rate-distortion optimized layered coding with unequal error protection for robust internet video. IEEE Trans. CSVT, 11(3):357-372.
[6] Goyal, V.K., 2001. Multiple description coding: compression meets the network. IEEE Signal Proc. Mag., 18(5):74-93.
[7] Jiang, W., Ortega, A., 1999. Multiple Description Coding via Polyphase Transform and Selective Quantization. Proc. VCIP 99.
[8] Lee, Y.C., Kim, J., Altunbasak, Y., Mersereau, R.M., 2003. Layered coded vs. multiple description coded video over error-prone networks. Signal Processing: Image Communication, 18(5):337-356.
[9] Mao, S., Lin, S., Wang, Y., Panwar, S., 2001. Reliable Transmission of Video over Ad-hoc Networks Using Automatic Repeat Request and Multi-Path Transport. Proc. of VTC.
[10] Orchard, M., Wang, Y., Vaishampayan, V., Reibman, A., 1997. Redundancy Rate Distortion Analysis of Multiple Description Image Coding Using Pairwise Correlating Transforms. Proc. of IEEE ICIP 1997. Santa Barbara, CA.
[11] Reibman, A.R., Jafarkhani, H., Orchard, M.T., Wang, Y., 1999. Performance of Multiple Description Coders on a Real Channel. Proc. of the ICASSP.
[12] Reibman, A.R., Wang, Y., Qiu, X., Jiang, Z., Chawla, K., 2000. Transmission of Multiple Description and Layered Video over an EGPRS Wireless Network. Proc. of ICIP.
[13] Shirani, S., Gallant, M., Kossentini, F., 2000. Multiple Description Image Coding Using Pre- and Post-Processing. International TCC. Las Vegas, Nevada, USA.
[14] Singh, R., Ortega, A., Perret, L., Jiang, W., 2000. Comparison of Multiple Description Coding and Layered Coding Based on Network Simulations. Proc. of the SPIE VCIP.
[15] Tang, X., Zakhor, X.A., 2001. Matching Pursuits Multiple Description Coding for Wireless Video. Proc. ICIP 2001. Thessaloniki, Greece.
[16] Vaishampayan, V.A., 1993. Design of multiple description scalar quantizer. IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, 39(3):821-834.
[17] Vitali, A., Fumagalli, M., 2005. Standard-compatible Multiple-Description Coding (MDC) and Layered Coding (LC) of Audio/Video Streams. Http://www.ietf.org, draft-vitali-ietf-avt-mdc-lc-00.txt.
[18] Wang, Y., Lin, S., 2002. Error-resilient video coding using multiple description motion compensation. Trans. on CSVT, 12(6):438-452.
[19] Wang, Y., Orchard, M.T., Vaishampayan, V.A., Reibman, A.R., 2001. Multiple description coding using pairwise correlating transforms. IEEE Trans. on Image Processing, 10(3):351-366.
[20] Wang, Y., Panwar, S., Lin, S., Mao, S., 2002. Wireless Video Transport Using Path Diversity: Multiple Description vs. Layered Coding. Proc. ICIP.
[21] Yang, X., Ramchandran, K., 1998. Optimal Multiple Description Subband Coding. Proc. of IEEE ICIP 1998. Chicago, IL.
Open peer comments: Debate/Discuss/Question/Opinion
<1>