Full Text:   <1999>

CLC number: X511

On-line Access: 

Received: 2006-12-19

Revision Accepted: 2007-02-14

Crosschecked: 0000-00-00

Cited: 7

Clicked: 3554

Citations:  Bibtex RefMan EndNote GB/T7714

-   Go to

Article info.
1. Reference List
Open peer comments

Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE A 2007 Vol.8 No.11 P.1816~1825

http://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.2007.A1816


Environmental damage costs from fossil electricity generation in China, 2000~2003


Author(s):  ZHANG Qing-yu, WEI Yu-mei, CHEN Ying-xu, GUO Hui

Affiliation(s):  Department of Environmental Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China

Corresponding email(s):   qy_zhang@zju.edu.cn

Key Words:  Environmental damage costs, Fossil electricity generation, Emission inventory, Uncertainty analysis


ZHANG Qing-yu, WEI Yu-mei, CHEN Ying-xu, GUO Hui. Environmental damage costs from fossil electricity generation in China, 2000~2003[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University Science A, 2007, 8(11): 1816~1825.

@article{title="Environmental damage costs from fossil electricity generation in China, 2000~2003",
author="ZHANG Qing-yu, WEI Yu-mei, CHEN Ying-xu, GUO Hui",
journal="Journal of Zhejiang University Science A",
volume="8",
number="11",
pages="1816~1825",
year="2007",
publisher="Zhejiang University Press & Springer",
doi="10.1631/jzus.2007.A1816"
}

%0 Journal Article
%T Environmental damage costs from fossil electricity generation in China, 2000~2003
%A ZHANG Qing-yu
%A WEI Yu-mei
%A CHEN Ying-xu
%A GUO Hui
%J Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE A
%V 8
%N 11
%P 1816~1825
%@ 1673-565X
%D 2007
%I Zhejiang University Press & Springer
%DOI 10.1631/jzus.2007.A1816

TY - JOUR
T1 - Environmental damage costs from fossil electricity generation in China, 2000~2003
A1 - ZHANG Qing-yu
A1 - WEI Yu-mei
A1 - CHEN Ying-xu
A1 - GUO Hui
J0 - Journal of Zhejiang University Science A
VL - 8
IS - 11
SP - 1816
EP - 1825
%@ 1673-565X
Y1 - 2007
PB - Zhejiang University Press & Springer
ER -
DOI - 10.1631/jzus.2007.A1816


Abstract: 
Electricity consumption increases rapidly with the rapid development of China. The environmental damage costs of electricity generation are very important for both policy analysis and the proper management of the environment. A method was developed in this work to estimate gross environmental damage costs according to emission inventory and environmental cost factors, and to extend the costs from provincial to national level with population density. In this paper, sulfur dioxide (SO2), nitrogen oxides (NOx), particulate matter less than 10 μm in diameter (PM10), and carbon dioxide (CO2) from fossil fired power plants over 6000 kW were selected as index pollutants to quantify the environmental costs of damages on human health and global warming. With the new developed method, environmental damage costs, caused by 3 types of fired power plants in 30 provinces and 6 economic sectors during the years 2000 to 2003, were evaluated and analyzed. It can be seen that the calculated total national environmental damage costs of electricity have rapidly increased from 94930.87×106 USD in 2000 to about 141041.39×106 USD in 2003, with an average annual growth rate of 14.11%. environmental damage costs of SO2, NOx, PM10, and CO2 are 69475.69×106, 30079.29×106, 28931.84×106, and 12554.57×106 USD and account for 49.26%, 21.33%, 20.51%, and 8.90% of total environmental costs in fossil electricity generation, respectively. With regard to regional distribution, external costs caused by fossil electricity generation are mainly concentrated in the more populated and industrialized areas of China, i.e., the Eastern Central and Southeastern areas.

Darkslateblue:Affiliate; Royal Blue:Author; Turquoise:Article

Reference

[1] CEPC (China Electric Power Committee), 2001. China Electric Power Yearbook 2001. China Electric Power Publishing House, Beijing, China (in Chinese).

[2] CEPC (China Electric Power Committee), 2002. China Electric Power Yearbook 2002. China Electric Power Publishing House, Beijing, China (in Chinese).

[3] CEPC (China Electric Power Committee), 2003. China Electric Power Yearbook 2003. China Electric Power Publishing House, Beijing, China (in Chinese).

[4] CEPC (China Electric Power Committee), 2004. China Electric Power Yearbook 2004. China Electric Power Publishing House, Beijing, China (in Chinese).

[5] Chae, Y., Hope, C., 2003. Integrated assessment of CO2 and SO2 policies in North East Asia. Climate Policy 3(S1):S57-S79.

[6] DITSNBS (Department of Industry and Transport Statistics National Bureau of Statistics, People’s Republic of China), 1995. China Energy Statistical Yearbook. China Statistics Press, Beijing, China (in Chinese).

[7] El-Kordy, M.N., Badr, M.A., Abed, K.A., Ibrahim, S.M.A., 2002. Economical evaluation of electricity generation considering externalities. Renewable Energy, 25(2):317-328.

[8] European Commission, 1995. Externalities of fuel cycles ExternE project. Report No.2—Methodology. European Commission DG XII. Science Research and Development. JOULE. EUR 16521 EN. Brussels Luxembourg.

[9] European Commission, 2003. External Costs Research Results on Socio-environmental Damages Due to Electricity and Transport External Cost. Http://www.wind-energie.de/fileadmin/dokumente/Themen_A-Z/Externe%20Kosten/Studie_ExternE.pdf

[10] Hao, J.M., Tian, H.Z., Lu, Y.Q., 2002. Emission inventories of NOx from commercial energy consumption in China, 1995-1998. Environ. Sci. Technol, 36(4):552-560.

[11] Hu, X.L., 2005. China’s electricity production and environmental problems. Energy of China, 27(11):10-17 (in Chinese).

[12] IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change), 1995. IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. IPCC, Bracknell, UK.

[13] Kato, N., Akimoto, H., 1992. Anthropogenic emissions of SO2 and NOx in Asia: emission inventories. Atmospheric Environment, 26(16):2997-3017.

[14] Kim, S.H., 2007. Evaluation of negative environmental impacts of electricity generation: neoclassical and institutional approaches. Energy Policy, 35(1):413-423.

[15] Krewitt, W., Nitsch, J., 2003. The German Renewable Energy Sources Act—an investment into the future pays off already today. Renewable Energy, 28(4):533-542.

[16] Krewitt, W., Heck, T., Trukenműller, A., Friedrich, R., 1999. Environmental damage costs from fossil electricity generation in Germany and Europe. Energy Policy, 27(3):173-183.

[17] Kuang, J.X., Long, T., Huang, Q.F., Jian, J.Y., 2001. Study of emission factor for burning fuel. Environmental Monitoring in China, 17(6):27-29 (in Chinese).

[18] Kuprianov, V.I., Tanetsakunvatana, V., 2006. Assessment of gaseous, PM and trace element emissions from a 300-MW lignite-fired boiler unit for various fuel qualities. Fuel, 85(14-15):2171-2179.

[19] Kypreos, S., Krakowski, R., 2005. An Assessment of the Power-Generation Sector of China. Http://eem.web.psi.ch/Presentations/2005-04-07_Taiwan_Kypreos_Krakowski.pdf

[20] Lechón, Y., Cabal, H., Sa’ez, R.M., Hallberg, B., Aquilonius, K., Schneider, T., Lepicard, S., Ward, D., Hamacher, T., Korhonen, R., 2003. External costs of silicon carbide fusion power plants compared to other advanced generation technologies. Fusion Engineering and Design, 69(1-4):683-688.

[21] Li, C.D., Li, Y.B., Dai, Q.H., 2004. Application of DEA method in efficiency evaluation of thermal power plants and its units. Modern Electric Power, 21(4):1-5 (in Chinese).

[22] López, M.T., Zuk, M., Garibay, V., Tzintzun, G., Iniestra, R., Fernández, A., 2005. Health impacts from power plant emissions in Mexico. Atmospheric Environment, 39(7):1199-1209.

[23] Lu, H., Zhou, H., 2004. The environmental costs analysis of power generation plant. Environmental Protection, 4:51-54 (in Chinese).

[24] NBSC (National Bureau of Statistics of China), 2001. China Statistical Yearbook 2001. China Statistics Press, Beijing, China (in Chinese).

[25] NBSC (National Bureau of Statistics of China), 2002. China Statistical Yearbook 2002. China Statistics Press, Beijing, China (in Chinese).

[26] NBSC (National Bureau of Statistics of China), 2003. China Statistical Yearbook 2003. China Statistics Press, Beijing, China (in Chinese).

[27] NBSC (National Bureau of Statistics of China), 2004. China Statistical Yearbook 2004. China Statistics Press, Beijing, China (in Chinese).

[28] Olivier, J.G.J., Peters, J.A.H.W., 2005. CO2 from non-energy use of fuels: A global, regional and national perspective based on the IPCC Tier 1 approach. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 45(3):210-225.

[29] Ottinger, R.L., Wooley, D.R., Robinson, N.A., Hodas, D.R., Babb, S.E., 1991. Environmental Costs of Electricity. Pace University Center for Environmental Legal Studies, Ocean Publications, New York.

[30] Roth, I.F., Ambs, L.L., 2004. Incorporating externalities into a full cost approach to electric power generation life-cycle costing. Energy, 29(12-15):2125-2144.

[31] Rowe, R.D., Lang, C.M., Chestnut, L.G., 1996. Critical factors in computing externalities for electricity resources. Resource and Energy Economics, 18(4):363-394.

[32] Smekens, K., Zwaan, B.V.D., 2006. Atmospheric and geological CO2 damage costs in energy scenarios. Environmental Science & Policy, 9(3):217-227.

[33] Soderholm, P., Sundqvist, T., 2003. Pricing environmental externalities in the power sector: ethical limits and implications for social choice. Ecological Economics, 46(3):333-350.

[34] Spalding-Fecher, R., Matibe, D.K., 2003. Electricity and externalities in South Africa. Energy Policy, 31(8):721-734.

[35] Steen, B., Borg, G., 2002. An estimation of the cost of sustainable production of metal concentrates from the earth’s crust. Ecological Economics, 42(3):401-413.

[36] Sun, K., 2004. Environmental cost analysis and research of different power plants. Energy Engineering, 3:23-26 (in Chinese).

[37] Tian, H.Z., Lu, Y.Q., Hao, J.M., Wang, S.X., Xue, Z.G., 2001. Control course and progress of acid rain and SO2 pollution in China. Electric Power, 34(3):51-56 (in Chinese).

[38] Vrhovcak, M.B., Tomsic, Z., Debrecin, N., 2005. External costs of electricity production: case study Croatia. Energy Policy, 33(11):1385-1395.

[39] Wang, Z.X., 2002. Countermeasures and suggestions oil SO2 discharge control for thermal power plants in China. Electric Power, 35(1):60-63 (in Chinese).

[40] Wang, W.X., Wang, W., Zhang, W.H., Hong, S.X., 1996. Geographical distribution of SO2 and NOx emission intensities and trends in China. China Environmental Science, 16(3):161-167 (in Chinese).

[41] Wei, F.Y., Cao, H.X., Wang, L.P., 2003. Climatic warming process during 1980s-1990s in China. Journal of Applied Meteorological Science, 14(1):79-86 (in Chinese).

[42] Xu, F.G., 2005. The challenge and opportunity of Chinese desulfuration industry. Metallurgy Environmental Protection, 3:20-23 (in Chinese).

[43] Yang, Y.F., Liu, B., 2001. Main uncertainties in calculating greenhouse gas emissions and its impact on clean development mechanism. Shanghai Environmental Sciences, 20(2):75-77 (in Chinese).

[44] Zhang, R.J., Wang, M.X., Zheng, X.H., Li, J., Wang, Y.S., Liu, X.Y., Li, Y., Wang, B.Z., Chen, Z.L., 2001. Analysis on present emission status of carbon dioxide in China. Climatic and Environmental Research, 6(3):321-327 (in Chinese).

[45] Zhang, Q., Klimont, Z., Streets, D.G., Huo, H., He, K.B., 2006. Emission model of PM sourced from human activities in China and emission inventory in 2001. Progress in Natural Science, 16(2):223-231 (in Chinese).

[46] Zhu, F.H., Zheng, Y.F., Guo, X.L., Wang, S., 2005. Environmental impacts and benefits of regional power grid interconnections for China. Energy Policy, 33(14):1797-1805.

Open peer comments: Debate/Discuss/Question/Opinion

<1>

Please provide your name, email address and a comment





Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE, 38 Zheda Road, Hangzhou 310027, China
Tel: +86-571-87952783; E-mail: cjzhang@zju.edu.cn
Copyright © 2000 - Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE