Full Text:   <1875>

CLC number: P315

On-line Access: 

Received: 2009-03-16

Revision Accepted: 2009-04-08

Crosschecked: 2009-04-09

Cited: 14

Clicked: 4096

Citations:  Bibtex RefMan EndNote GB/T7714

-   Go to

Article info.
1. Reference List
Open peer comments

Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE A 2009 Vol.10 No.5 P.619~634


Use of probabilistic and deterministic measures to identify unfavorable earthquake records

Author(s):  Abbas MOUSTAFA, Izuru TAKEWAKI

Affiliation(s):  Department of Urban and Environmental Engineering, Graduate School of Engineering, Kyoto University, Nishikyo-ku 615-8540, Japan; more

Corresponding email(s):   abbas.moustafa@yahoo.com, takewaki@archi.kyoto-u.ac.jp

Key Words:  Entropy rate, Dispersion index, Power spectral density function (PSDF), Frequency content, Unfavorable ground motion, Resonant acceleration, Critical accelerogram, Energy, Damage index

Share this article to: More |Next Article >>>

Abbas MOUSTAFA, Izuru TAKEWAKI. Use of probabilistic and deterministic measures to identify unfavorable earthquake records[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University Science A, 2009, 10(5): 619~634.

@article{title="Use of probabilistic and deterministic measures to identify unfavorable earthquake records",
author="Abbas MOUSTAFA, Izuru TAKEWAKI",
journal="Journal of Zhejiang University Science A",
publisher="Zhejiang University Press & Springer",

%0 Journal Article
%T Use of probabilistic and deterministic measures to identify unfavorable earthquake records
%J Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE A
%V 10
%N 5
%P 619~634
%@ 1673-565X
%D 2009
%I Zhejiang University Press & Springer
%DOI 10.1631/jzus.A0930001

T1 - Use of probabilistic and deterministic measures to identify unfavorable earthquake records
J0 - Journal of Zhejiang University Science A
VL - 10
IS - 5
SP - 619
EP - 634
%@ 1673-565X
Y1 - 2009
PB - Zhejiang University Press & Springer
ER -
DOI - 10.1631/jzus.A0930001

This study introduces measures to identify resonant (concentration of energy in a single or a few frequencies) or unfavorable earthquake ground motions. Probabilistic measures based on the entropy rate and the geometric properties of the power spectral density function (PSDF) of the ground acceleration are developed first. Subsequently, deterministic measures for the frequency content of the ground acceleration are also developed. These measures are then used for identifying resonance and criticality in stochastic earthquake models and 110 acceleration records measured at rock, stiff, medium and soft soil sites. The unfavorable earthquake record for a given structure is defined as the record having a narrow frequency content and dominant frequency close to the structure fundamental natural frequency. Accordingly, the measures developed in this study may provide a basis for selecting records that are capable of producing the highest structural response. Numerical verifications are provided on damage caused to structures by identified resonant records.

Darkslateblue:Affiliate; Royal Blue:Author; Turquoise:Article


[1] Abbas, A.M., 2002. Deterministic/Reliability-based Critical Earthquake Load Models for Linear/Nonlinear Structures. PhD Thesis, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore.

[2] Abbas, A.M., 2006. Critical seismic load inputs for simple inelastic structures. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 296(4-5):949-967.

[3] Abbas, A.M., Manohar, C.S., 2002. Investigations into critical earthquake excitations within deterministic and probabilistic frameworks. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 31(4):813-832.

[4] Abbas, A.M., Manohar, C.S., 2007. Reliability-based vector nonstationary random critical earthquake excitations for parametrically excited systems. Structural Safety, 29(1):32-48.

[5] Amiri, G.G., Dana, F.M., 2005. Introduction to the most suitable parameter for selection of critical earthquakes. Computers & Structures, 83(8-9):613-626.

[6] Anderson, J.C., Bertero, V.V., 1987. Uncertainties in establishing design earthquakes. Journal of Structural Engineerin, 113(8):1709-1724.

[7] Arias, A., 1970. A Measure of Earthquake Intensity. Seismic Design of Nuclear Power Plants. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, p.438-468.

[8] Dhakal, R.P., Mander, J.B., Mashiko, N., 2006. Identification of critical ground motions for seismic performance assessment of structures. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 35(8):989-1008.

[9] Kanai, K., 1957. Semi-empirical formula for the seismic characteristics of the ground. Bulletin of Earthquake Research Institute, University of Tokyo, 35:309-325.

[10] Kapur, J.N., 1993. Maximum Entropy Models in Science and Engineering. Wiley Eastern, New Delhi.

[11] Lin, Y.K., 1967. Probabilistic Theory of Structural Dynamics. McGraw-Hill, NY.

[12] Manohar, C.S., Sarkar, A., 1995. Critical earthquake input power spectral density function models for engineering structures. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 24:1549-1566.

[13] Moustafa, A., 2008. Discussion of a new approach of selecting real input ground motions for seismic design: the most unfavorable real seismic design ground motions. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics (in press).

[14] Moustafa, A., 2009. Discussion of ‘‘The effect of energy concentration of earthquake ground motions on the nonlinear response of RC structures’’ by H. Cao, M.I. Friswell. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 29(7):1181-1183.

[15] Nigam, N.C., Narayanan, S., 1994. Applications of Random Vibrations. Narosa Publishing House, New Delhi.

[16] Papoulis, A., 1991. Probability, Random Variables and Stochastic Processes. McGraw-Hill, NY.

[17] Park, Y.J., Ang, A.H.S., 1985. Mechanistic seismic damage model for reinforced concrete. Journal of Structural Engineering, 111(4):722-739.

[18] PEER, 2005. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center. Available from: http://peer.berkeley.edu (Accessed 2008)

[19] Shannon, C., 1948. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal, 27:623-656.

[20] Tajimi, H., 1960. A Statistical Method of Determining the Maximum Response of a Building Structure during Earthquakes. Proc. 2nd WCEE, Tokyo, 2:781-797.

[21] Takewaki, I., 2001. Resonance and criticality measure of ground motions via probabilistic critical excitation method. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 21(8):645-659.

[22] Takewaki, I., 2002. Seismic critical excitation method for robust design: A review. Journal of Structural Engineering, 128(5):665-672.

[23] Takewaki, I., 2004. Bound of earthquake input energy. Journal of Structural Engineering, 130(9):1289-1297.

[24] Takewaki, I., 2007. Critical Excitation Methods in Earthquake Engineering. Elsevier, Amsterdam, p.1-22.

[25] Trifunac, M.D, Brady, A.G., 1975. A study on the duration of strong earthquake ground motion. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 65(3):581-626.

[26] Uang, C.M., Bertero, V.V., 1988. Implications of Recorded Earthquake Ground Motions on Seismic Design of Building Structures. Report No. UCB/EERC-88/13, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Berkeley, CA.

[27] Vanmarcke, E.H., 1972. Properties of spectral moments with applications to random vibration. Journal of the Engineering Mechanics Division, 98(2):425-446.

[28] Vanmarcke, E.H., 1976. Structural Response to Earthquakes. In: Lomnitz, C., Rosenbluth, E. (Eds.), Seismic Risk and Engineering Decisions. Elsevier, NY.

[29] Zhai, C.H., Xie, L.L., 2007. A new approach of selecting real input ground motions for seismic design: The most unfavourable real seismic design ground motions. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 36(8):1009-1027.

Open peer comments: Debate/Discuss/Question/Opinion



2010-01-29 10:43:17

This study develops measures to identify resonance of earthquake ground motions. Usefulness measures!!

Please provide your name, email address and a comment

Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE, 38 Zheda Road, Hangzhou 310027, China
Tel: +86-571-87952783; E-mail: cjzhang@zju.edu.cn
Copyright © 2000 - Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE