Similar articles

Abstract: Interfacing and compatibility are the most challenging issues that affect the performance of polymer modified asphalt. Mechanisms of interfacial enhancement among four base asphalt components (asphaltenes, resins, aromatics, and saturate), styrene-butadiene-styrene (SBS), and carbon nanotubes (CNTs) were investigated by molecular dynamics simulation, with the aim of understanding the key parameters that control the compatibility of CNTs and interphase behavior on the molecular scale. The compatibility of SBS-modified asphalt (SBSMA) was simulated based on self-assembly theory using indexes of binding energy, mean square displacement, diffusion coefficient, and relative concentration distribution. The interphase behavior and microstructure were observed by fluorescence microscopy and scanning electron microscopy. In addition, a rutting experiment was used to verify the molecular dynamics simulation based on macroscopic performance. The results showed that after adding CNTs, the binding energy of the SBS and aromatics increased from 301.8343 to 327.1102 kcal/mol. The diffusion coefficient of the SBS and asphaltenes decreased more than 3.2×10⁻¹¹ m²/s, and the correlation coefficients between the diffusion coefficient and the molecular weight, surface area and volume were all lower than 0.3. Relative concentration distribution curves indicated that CNTs promote the ability of SBS to swell. Microscopic observations demonstrated that the swelling ability of SBS was increased by CNTs. Overall, the interphase of SBSMA was improved by the additional reinforcement, swelling, and diffusion provided by CNTs. Finally, the rutting experiment found that no matter what the temperature, the rutting factor of CNT/SBSMA is higher than that of SBSMA, which corroborates the findings from the molecular dynamics simulations.

碳纳米管/苯乙烯-丁二烯-苯乙烯复合改性沥青相容性的分子动力学模拟和微观观察

[1]AASHTO (American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials), 2008. Standard Method of Test for Determining the Rheological Properties of Asphalt Binder Using a Dynamic Shear Rheometer (DSR), AASHTO T 315-08. AASHTO, USA.

[2]ASTM (American Society for Testing and Materials), 2003. Standard Test Method for Density of Semi-solid Bituminous Materials, ASTM D70-03. ASTM International, USA.

[3]ASTM (American Society for Testing and Materials), 2006. Standard Test Method for Softening Point of Bitumen (Ring-and-Ball Apparatus), ASTM D36-06. ASTM International, USA.

[4]ASTM (American Society for Testing and Materials), 2009. Standard Test Method for Separation of Asphalt into Four Fractions, ASTM D4124-09. ASTM International, USA.

[5]ASTM (American Society for Testing and Materials), 2012. Standard Test Method for Viscosity Determination of Asphalt at Elevated Temperatures Using a Rotational Viscometer, ASTM D4402/D4402M-12. ASTM International, USA.

[6]ASTM (American Society for Testing and Materials), 2013. Standard Test Method for Penetration of Bituminous Materials, ASTM D5/D5M-13. ASTM International, USA.

[7]ASTM (American Society for Testing and Materials), 2017. Standard Test Method for Ductility of Asphalt Materials, ASTM D113-17. ASTM International, USA.

[8]Bhasin A, Bommavaram R, Greenfield ML, et al., 2011. Use of molecular dynamics to investigate self-healing mechanisms in asphalt binders. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 23(4):485-492.

[9]Davis C, Castorena C, 2015. Implications of physico–chemical interactions in asphalt mastics on asphalt microstructure. Construction and Building Materials, 94:83-89.

[10]Fu YZ, Liao LQ, Yang LX, et al., 2013. Molecular dynamics and dissipative particle dynamics simulations for prediction of miscibility in polyethylene terephthalate/ polylactide blends. Molecular Simulation, 39(5):415-422.

[11]Hansen JS, Lemarchand CA, Nielsen E, et al., 2013. Four-component united-atom model of bitumen. Journal of Chemical Physics, 138(9):094508.

[12]Hu K, Yu CH, Yang QL, et al., 2021. Multi-scale enhancement mechanisms of graphene oxide on styrene–butadiene– styrene modified asphalt: an exploration from molecular dynamics simulations. Materials & Design, 208:109901.

[13]Khanal LR, Sundararajan JA, Qiang Y, 2020. Advanced nanomaterials for nuclear energy and nanotechnology. Energy Technology, 8(3):1901070.

[14]Lemarchand CA, Greenfield ML, Dyre JC, et al., 2018. ROSE bitumen: mesoscopic model of bitumen and bituminous mixtures. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 149(21):214901.

[15]Li DD, Greenfield ML, 2014. Chemical compositions of improved model asphalt systems for molecular simulations. Fuel, 115:347-356.

[16]Liao RJ, Zhu MZ, Zhou X, et al., 2012. Molecular dynamics study of the disruption of H-bonds by water molecules and its diffusion behavior in amorphous cellulose. Modern Physics Letters B, 26(14):1250088.

[17]Liu SJ, Zhou SB, Peng AH, 2020. Analysis of moisture susceptibility of foamed warm mix asphalt based on cohesion, adhesion, bond strength, and morphology. Journal of Cleaner Production, 277:123334.

[18]Pan JL, Tarefder RA, 2016. Investigation of asphalt aging behaviour due to oxidation using molecular dynamics simulation. Molecular Simulation, 42(8):667-678.

[19]Polacco G, Filippi S, Merusi F, et al., 2015. A review of the fundamentals of polymer-modified asphalts: asphalt/ polymer interactions and principles of compatibility. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science, 224:72-112.

[20]Slebi-Acevedo CJ, Lastra-González P, Pascual-Muñoz P, et al., 2019. Mechanical performance of fibers in hot mix asphalt: a review. Construction and Building Materials, 200: 756-769.

[21]Sun DQ, Lin TB, Zhu XY, et al., 2016. Indices for self-healing performance assessments based on molecular dynamics simulation of asphalt binders. Computational Materials Science, 114:86-93.

[22]Sun W, Wang H, 2020. Moisture effect on nanostructure and adhesion energy of asphalt on aggregate surface: a molecular dynamics study. Applied Surface Science, 510: 145435.

[23]Wang H, Lin EQ, Xu GJ, 2017. Molecular dynamics simulation of asphalt-aggregate interface adhesion strength with moisture effect. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 18(5):414-423.

[24]Wang P, Dong ZJ, Tan YQ, et al., 2015. Investigating the interactions of the saturate, aromatic, resin, and asphaltene four fractions in asphalt binders by molecular simulations. Energy & Fuels, 29(1):112-121.

[25]Wang P, Dong ZJ, Tan YQ, et al., 2017a. Identifying the rheological properties of polymer-modified bitumen based on its morphology. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 18(S3):249-258.

[26]Wang P, Dong ZJ, Liu ZY, 2017b. Influence of carbon nanotubes on morphology of asphalts modified with styrene-butadiene-styrene. Transportation Research Record, 2632(1):130-139.

[27]Xu GJ, Wang H, 2016. Study of cohesion and adhesion properties of asphalt concrete with molecular dynamics simulation. Computational Materials Science, 112:161-169.

[28]Xu GJ, Wang H, 2017. Molecular dynamics study of oxidative aging effect on asphalt binder properties. Fuel, 188:1-10.

[29]Xu GJ, Wang H, 2018. Diffusion and interaction mechanism of rejuvenating agent with virgin and recycled asphalt binder: a molecular dynamics study. Molecular Simulation, 44(17):1433-1443.

[30]Xu M, Yi JY, Feng DH, et al., 2016. Analysis of adhesive characteristics of asphalt based on atomic force microscopy and molecular dynamics simulation. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 8(19):12393-12403.

[31]Yao H, Dai QL, You ZP, 2015. Chemo-physical analysis and molecular dynamics (MD) simulation of moisture susceptibility of nano hydrated lime modified asphalt mixtures. Construction and Building Materials, 101:536-547.

[32]Yao H, Dai QL, You ZP, 2016. Molecular dynamics simulation of physicochemical properties of the asphalt model. Fuel, 164:83-93.

[33]Yu CH, Hu K, Yang QL, et al., 2021. Analysis of the storage stability property of carbon nanotube/recycled polyethylene-modified asphalt using molecular dynamics simulations. Polymers, 13(10):1658.

[34]Zeng Q, Liu QC, Liu P, et al., 2020. Study on modification mechanism of nano-ZnO/polymerised styrene butadiene composite-modified asphalt using density functional theory. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 21(5):1426-1438.

[35]Zhang DM, Chen ZH, Zhang HL, et al., 2018. Rheological and anti-aging performance of SBS modified asphalt binders with different multi-dimensional nanomaterials. Construction and Building Materials, 188:409-416.

[36]Zhang HL, Su MM, Zhao SF, et al., 2016. High and low temperature properties of nano-particles/polymer modified asphalt. Construction and Building Materials, 114:323-332.

[37]Zhang HL, Gao Y, Guo GH, et al., 2018. Effects of ZnO particle size on properties of asphalt and asphalt mixture. Construction and Building Materials, 159:578-586.

[38]Zhang LQ, Greenfield ML, 2007. Analyzing properties of model asphalts using molecular simulation. Energy & Fuels, 21(3):1712-1716.

[39]Zhang LQ, Greenfield ML, 2008. Effects of polymer modification on properties and microstructure of model asphalt systems. Energy & Fuels, 22(5):3363-3375.

[40]Zhou XX, Zhang GF, Liu RM, et al., 2014. Molecular simulations of anti-aging mechanisms on nano-LDHs modified asphalt. Key Engineering Materials, 599:198-202.