Full Text:   <966>

Summary:  <71>

CLC number: B82-057

On-line Access: 2019-01-07

Received: 2018-12-16

Revision Accepted: 2018-12-23

Crosschecked: 2018-12-29

Cited: 0

Clicked: 1055

Citations:  Bibtex RefMan EndNote GB/T7714

 ORCID:

Jing-ru Li

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4484-4320

Xin-qing Zhang

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8225-3516

-   Go to

Article info.
Open peer comments

Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE B 2019 Vol.20 No.1 P.32-38

10.1631/jzus.B1800624


Experiments that led to the first gene-edited babies: the ethical failings and the urgent need for better governance


Author(s):  Jing-ru Li, Simon Walker, Jing-bao Nie, Xin-qing Zhang

Affiliation(s):  Bioethics Center, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin 9016, New Zealand; more

Corresponding email(s):   xqzhang@pumc.edu.cn

Key Words:  Jian-kui HE, Human germline gene editing, Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR)-Cas9, Ethical review


Jing-ru Li, Simon Walker, Jing-bao Nie, Xin-qing Zhang. Experiments that led to the first gene-edited babies: the ethical failings and the urgent need for better governance[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University Science B, 2019, 20(4): 32-38.

@article{title="Experiments that led to the first gene-edited babies: the ethical failings and the urgent need for better governance",
author="Jing-ru Li, Simon Walker, Jing-bao Nie, Xin-qing Zhang",
journal="Journal of Zhejiang University Science B",
volume="20",
number="1",
pages="32-38",
year="2019",
publisher="Zhejiang University Press & Springer",
doi="10.1631/jzus.B1800624"
}

%0 Journal Article
%T Experiments that led to the first gene-edited babies: the ethical failings and the urgent need for better governance
%A Jing-ru Li
%A Simon Walker
%A Jing-bao Nie
%A Xin-qing Zhang
%J Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE B
%V 20
%N 1
%P 32-38
%@ 1673-1581
%D 2019
%I Zhejiang University Press & Springer

TY - JOUR
T1 - Experiments that led to the first gene-edited babies: the ethical failings and the urgent need for better governance
A1 - Jing-ru Li
A1 - Simon Walker
A1 - Jing-bao Nie
A1 - Xin-qing Zhang
J0 - Journal of Zhejiang University Science B
VL - 20
IS - 1
SP - 32
EP - 38
%@ 1673-1581
Y1 - 2019
PB - Zhejiang University Press & Springer
ER -


Abstract: 
The rapid developments of science and technology in China over recent decades, particularly in biomedical research, have brought forward serious challenges regarding ethical governance. Recently, jian-kui HE, a Chinese scientist, claimed to have “created” the first gene-edited babies, designed to be naturally immune to the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). The news immediately triggered widespread criticism, denouncement, and debate over the scientific and ethical legitimacy of HE’s genetic experiments. China’s guidelines and regulations have banned germline genome editing on human embryos for clinical use because of scientific and ethical concerns, in accordance with the international consensus. HE’s human experimentation has not only violated these Chinese regulations, but also breached other ethical and regulatory norms. These include questionable scientific value, unreasonable risk-benefit ratio, illegitimate ethics review, invalid informed consent, and regulatory misconduct. This series of ethical failings of HE and his team reveal the institutional failure of the current ethics governance system which largely depends on scientist’s self-regulation. The incident highlights the need for urgent improvement of ethics governance at all levels, the enforcement of technical and ethical guidelines, and the establishment of laws relating to such bioethical issues.

Darkslateblue:Affiliate; Royal Blue:Author; Turquoise:Article

Reference

[1]Allers K, Hütter G, Hofmann J, et al., 2011. Evidence for the cure of HIV infection by CCR5Δ32/Δ32 stem cell transplantation. Blood, 117(10):2791-2799.

[2]Bauer G, Anderson JS, 2014. Gene Therapy for HIV. Springer, New York, NY.

[3]Baumann M, 2016. CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing—new and old ethical issues arising from a revolutionary technology. Nanoethics, 10(2):139-159.

[4]de Miguel Beriain I, del Cano AMM, 2018. Chapter 12 Gene editing in human embryos. A comment on the ethical issues involved. In: Soniewicka M (Ed.), The Ethics of Reproductive Genetics: Between Utility, Principles, and Virtues. Springer, Cham, p.173-183.

[5]Dunbar CE, High KA, Joung JK, et al., 2018. Gene therapy comes of age. Science, 359(6372):eaan4672.

[6]Kim D, Bae S, Park J, et al., 2015. Digenome-seq: genome-wide profiling of CRISPR-Cas9 off-target effects in human cells. Nat Methods, 12(3):237-243.

[7]Li YJ, Han Y, Xie J, et al., 2014. CRF01_AE subtype is associated with X4 tropism and fast HIV progression in Chinese patients infected through sexual transmission. AIDS, 28(4):521-530.

[8]Liang PP, Xu YW, Zhang XY, et al., 2015. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene editing in human tripronuclear zygotes. Protein Cell, 6(5):363-372.

[9]Liu SJ, Kong CJ, Wu J, et al., 2012. Effect of CCR532 heterozygosity on HIV-1 susceptibility: a meta-analysis. PLoS ONE, 7(4):e35020.

[10]Nie JB, Fitzgerald RP, 2016. Connecting the east and the west, the local and the universal: the methodological elements of a transcultural approach to bioethics. Kennedy Inst Ethics J, 26(3):219-247.

[11]Qiu RZ, 2016. Debating ethical issues in genome editing technology. Asian Bioeth Rev, 8(4):307-326.

[12]SinaTech, 2018. The first human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) immune gene-edited babies were born in China. https://tech.sina.cn/d/bk/2018-11-26/detail-ihmutuec3688779.d.html [Accessed on Nov. 26, 2018] (in Chinese).

[13]Tebas P, Stein D, Tang WW, et al., 2014. Gene editing of CCR5 in autologous CD4 T cells of persons infected with HIV. N Engl J Med, 370(10):901-910.

[14]Wang C, Zhai XM, Zhang XQ, et al., 2018. Gene-edited babies: Chinese academy of medical sciences’ response and action. Lancet, in press.

[15]Wu YX, Liang D, Wang YH, et al., 2013. Correction of a genetic disease in mouse via use of CRISPR-Cas9. Cell Stem Cell, 13(6):659-662.

[16]Zhang XQ, 2016. Risk-benefit analysis of CRISPR-Cas germline editing clinical research on human embryos and its ethical governance. Sci Soc, 6(3):12-21 (in Chinese).

Open peer comments: Debate/Discuss/Question/Opinion

<1>

Please provide your name, email address and a comment





Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE, 38 Zheda Road, Hangzhou 310027, China
Tel: +86-571-87952276/87952783; E-mail: jzus@zju.edu.cn
Copyright © 2000 - Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE