
CLC number:
On-line Access: 2024-08-27
Received: 2023-10-17
Revision Accepted: 2024-05-08
Crosschecked: 2024-01-15
Cited: 0
Clicked: 3425
Zichao YIN, Yesha NI, Lin LI, Tong WANG, Jiafeng WU, Zhe LI, Dapeng TAN. Numerical modeling and experimental investigation of a two-phase sink vortex and its fluid–solid vibration characteristics[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University Science A,in press.Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering,in press.https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.A2200014 @article{title="Numerical modeling and experimental investigation of a two-phase sink vortex and its fluid–solid vibration characteristics", %0 Journal Article TY - JOUR
两相汇流漩涡及流固耦合振动特性的模拟与研究机构:1浙江工业大学,机械工程学院,中国杭州,310014;2浙江大学,流体动力与机电系统国家重点实验室,中国杭州,310058 目的:汇流旋涡的实时监测可有效促进冶金精炼、燃料系统、水力发电等工业场景的提质增效。本文旨在建立两相旋涡流固耦合模型,获取壁面冲击振动信号和提取旋涡贯穿特征,以期为工业防涡和抑涡提供理论参考与技术支持。 创新点:1.建立了涡流力学模型,得到了临界贯入状态的规律;2.建立了流固耦合模型,得到了涡激振动信号;3.提出了一种基于四方程的振动响应求解方法。 方法:1.采用水平集方法,建立自由汇流旋涡模型来研究气液两相作用机理;2.建立流固耦合动力学模型,研究冲击振动特性,并揭示临界流动状态的转变机理;3.搭建实验观测平台,验证数值计算结果的准确性。 结论:1.涡流耦合能量引起的压力振荡是流固冲击振动产生的根本原因;2.旋涡达到临界穿透状态时,两相耦合引起的压力振荡导致各频率信号显著增强,且高频波段尤为明显;3.根据流体动力学相似理论搭建的实验平台可基于冲击振动特性实现对汇流旋涡的实时监测。 关键词组: Darkslateblue:Affiliate; Royal Blue:Author; Turquoise:Article
Reference[1]AndersenA, BohrT, StenumB, et al., 2003. Anatomy of a bathtub vortex. Physical Review Letters, 91(10):104502. ![]() [2]AndersenA, BohrT, StenumB, et al., 2006. The bathtub vortex in a rotating container. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 556:121-146. ![]() [3]BalcázarN, LehmkuhlO, JofreL, et al., 2015. Level-set simulations of buoyancy-driven motion of single and multiple bubbles. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, 56:91-107. ![]() [4]CaoLX, LiuJ, LuC, et al., 2022. Efficient inverse method for structural identification considering modeling and response uncertainties. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 35(1):75. ![]() [5]ChenJL, XuF, TanDP, et al., 2015. A control method for agricultural greenhouses heating based on computational fluid dynamics and energy prediction model. Applied Energy, 141:106-118. ![]() [6]CristofanoL, NobiliM, RomanoGP, et al., 2016. Investigation on bathtub vortex flow field by particle image velocimetry. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, 74:130-142. ![]() [7]FanXH, TanDP, LiL, et al., 2021. Modeling and solution method of gas-liquid-solid three-phase flow mixing. Acta Physica Sinica, 70(12):124501 (in Chinese). ![]() [8]GeJQ, JiSM, TanDP, 2018. A gas-liquid-solid three-phase abrasive flow processing method based on bubble collapsing. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 95(1-4):1069-1085. ![]() [9]JeongJT, 2012. Free-surface deformation due to spiral flow owing to a source/sink and a vortex in Stokes flow. Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics, 26(1):93-103. ![]() [10]JiSM, WengXX, TanDP, 2012. Analytical method of softness abrasive two-phase flow field based on 2D model of LSM. Acta Physica Sinica, 61(1):010205 (in Chinese). ![]() [11]KaiserJWJ, AdamiS, AkhatovIS, et al., 2020. A semi-implicit conservative sharp-interface method for liquid-solid phase transition. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 155:119800. ![]() [12]KinzelMP, LindauJW, KunzRF, 2018. A multiphase level-set approach for all-Mach numbers. Computers & Fluids, 167:1-16. ![]() [13]KoriaSC, KanthU, 1994. Model studies of slag carry-over during drainage of metallurgical vessels. Steel Research, 65(1):8-14. ![]() [14]LiHX, WangQ, JiangJW, et al., 2016. Analysis of factors affecting free surface vortex formation during steel teeming. ISIJ International, 56(1):94-102. ![]() [15]LiL, QiH, YinZC, et al., 2020. Investigation on the multiphase sink vortex Ekman pumping effects by CFD-DEM coupling method. Powder Technology, 360:462-480. ![]() [16]LiL, TanDP, YinZC, et al., 2021. Investigation on the multiphase vortex and its fluid-solid vibration characters for sustainability production. Renewable Energy, 175:887-909. ![]() [17]LiL, TanYF, XuWX, et al., 2023a. Fluid-induced transport dynamics and vibration patterns of multiphase vortex in the critical transition states. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 252:108376. ![]() [18]LiL, XuWX, TanYF, et al., 2023b. Fluid-induced vibration evolution mechanism of multiphase free sink vortex and the multi-source vibration sensing method. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 189:110058. ![]() [19]LiL, LuB, XuWX, et al., 2023c. Mechanism of multiphase coupling transport evolution of free sink vortex. Acta Physica Sinica, 72(3):034702 (in Chinese). ![]() [20]LiL, GuZH, XuWX, et al., 2023d. Mixing mass transfer mechanism and dynamic control of gas-liquid-solid multiphase flow based on VOF-DEM coupling. Energy, 272:127015. ![]() [21]LinQL, LiuL, ZhuWQ, 2022. Formation mechanism of precursor films at high temperatures: a review. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 35(1):21. ![]() [22]LuJF, WangT, LiL, et al., 2020. Dynamic characteristics and wall effects of bubble bursting in gas-liquid-solid three-phase particle flow. Processes, 8(7):760. ![]() [23]LundgrenTS, 1985. The vortical flow above the drain-hole in a rotating vessel. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 155:381-412. ![]() [24]LuoK, ShaoCX, YangY, et al., 2015. A mass conserving level set method for detailed numerical simulation of liquid atomization. Journal of Computational Physics, 298:495-519. ![]() [25]LyuHP, ZhangLB, TanDP, et al., 2023. A collaborative assembly for low-voltage electrical apparatuses. Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering, 24(6):890-905. ![]() [26]MikotaG, MikotaJ, 2020. Energy related model correlation criteria for modal analysis of fluid-structure interaction systems. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 483:115480. ![]() [27]MoralesRD, Dávila-MaldonadoO, CalderónI, et al., 2013. Physical and mathematical models of vortex flows during the last stages of steel draining operations from a ladle. ISIJ International, 53(5):782-791. ![]() [28]PanY, JiSM, TanDP, et al., 2020. Cavitation-based soft abrasive flow processing method. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 109(9-12):2587-2602. ![]() [29]SamP, AntoninC, RichartzM, et al., 2018. Black hole quasibound states from a draining bathtub vortex flow. Physical Review Letters, 121(6):061101. ![]() [30]SangalliLA, BraunAL, 2020. A fluid-structure interaction model for numerical simulation of bridge flutter using sectional models with active control devices. Preliminary results. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 477:115338. ![]() [31]SleitiAK, 2020. Isobaric expansion engines powered by low-grade heat—working fluid performance and selection database for power and thermomechanical refrigeration. Energy Technology, 8(11):2000613. ![]() [32]TanDP, LiPY, JiYX, et al., 2013. SA-ANN-based slag carry-over detection method and the embedded WME platform. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 60(10):4702-4713. ![]() [33]TanDP, YangT, ZhaoJ, et al., 2016. Free sink vortex Ekman suction-extraction evolution mechanism. Acta Physica Sinica, 65(5):054701 (in Chinese). ![]() [34]TanDP, NiYS, ZhangLB, 2017. Two-phase sink vortex suction mechanism and penetration dynamic characteristics in ladle teeming process. Journal of Iron and Steel Research International, 24(7):669-677. ![]() [35]TanDP, LiL, ZhuYL, et al., 2018. An embedded cloud database service method for distributed industry monitoring. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 14(7):2881-2893. ![]() [36]TanDP, LiL, ZhuYL, et al., 2019. Critical penetration condition and Ekman suction-extraction mechanism of a sink vortex. Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE A (Applied Physics & Engineering), 20(1):61-72. ![]() [37]TanDP, LiL, YinZC, et al., 2020. Ekman boundary layer mass transfer mechanism of free sink vortex. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 150:119250. ![]() [38]TurkyilmazogluM, 2011. Wall stretching in magnetohydrodynamics rotating flows in inertial and rotating frames. Journal of Thermophysics and Heat Transfer, 25(4):606-613. ![]() [39]TurkyilmazogluM, 2018. Flow and heat due to a surface formed by a vortical source. European Journal of Mechanics-B/Fluids, 68:76-84. ![]() [40]WangT, WangCY, YinYX, et al., 2023. Analytical approach for nonlinear vibration response of the thin cylindrical shell with a straight crack. Nonlinear Dynamics, 111(12):10957-10980. ![]() [41]WangYY, ZhangYL, TanDP, et al., 2021. Key technologies and development trends in advanced intelligent sawing equipments. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 34(1):30. ![]() [42]YuanSY, TangHW, XiaoY, et al., 2016. Turbulent flow structure at a 90-degree open channel confluence: accounting for the distortion of the shear layer. Journal of Hydro-Environment Research, 12:130-147. ![]() [43]ZhengSH, YuYK, QiuMZ, et al., 2021. A modal analysis of vibration response of a cracked fluid-filled cylindrical shell. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 91:934-958. ![]() Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE, 38 Zheda Road, Hangzhou
310027, China
Tel: +86-571-87952783; E-mail: cjzhang@zju.edu.cn Copyright © 2000 - 2026 Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE | ||||||||||||||



ORCID:
Open peer comments: Debate/Discuss/Question/Opinion
<1>