CLC number: TP212.9
On-line Access: 2024-08-27
Received: 2023-10-17
Revision Accepted: 2024-05-08
Crosschecked: 2023-02-27
Cited: 0
Clicked: 2369
Citations: Bibtex RefMan EndNote GB/T7714
Yunpu ZHANG, Qiang FU, Ganlin SHAN. A multi-sensor-system cooperative scheduling method for ground area detection and target tracking[J]. Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering, 2023, 24(2): 245-258.
@article{title="A multi-sensor-system cooperative scheduling method for ground area detection and target tracking",
author="Yunpu ZHANG, Qiang FU, Ganlin SHAN",
journal="Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering",
volume="24",
number="2",
pages="245-258",
year="2023",
publisher="Zhejiang University Press & Springer",
doi="10.1631/FITEE.2200121"
}
%0 Journal Article
%T A multi-sensor-system cooperative scheduling method for ground area detection and target tracking
%A Yunpu ZHANG
%A Qiang FU
%A Ganlin SHAN
%J Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering
%V 24
%N 2
%P 245-258
%@ 2095-9184
%D 2023
%I Zhejiang University Press & Springer
%DOI 10.1631/FITEE.2200121
TY - JOUR
T1 - A multi-sensor-system cooperative scheduling method for ground area detection and target tracking
A1 - Yunpu ZHANG
A1 - Qiang FU
A1 - Ganlin SHAN
J0 - Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering
VL - 24
IS - 2
SP - 245
EP - 258
%@ 2095-9184
Y1 - 2023
PB - Zhejiang University Press & Springer
ER -
DOI - 10.1631/FITEE.2200121
Abstract: A multi-sensor-system cooperative scheduling method for multi-task collaboration is proposed in this paper. We studied the method for application in ground area detection and target tracking. The aim of sensor scheduling is to select the optimal sensors to complete the assigned combat tasks and obtain the best combat benefits. First, an area detection model was built, and the method of calculating the detection risk was proposed to quantify the detection benefits in scheduling. Then, combining the information on road constraints and the doppler blind zone, a ground target tracking model was established, in which the posterior Carmér-Rao lower bound was applied to evaluate future tracking accuracy. Finally, an objective function was developed which considers the requirements of detection, tracking, and energy consumption control. By solving the objective function, the optimal sensor-scheduling scheme can be obtained. Simulation results showed that the proposed sensor-scheduling method can select suitable sensors to complete the required combat tasks, and provide good performance in terms of area detection, target tracking, and energy consumption control.
[1]Beard M, Vo BT, Vo BN, et al., 2015. Sensor control for multi-target tracking using Cauchy-Schwarz divergence. Proc 18th Int Conf on Information Fusion, p.937-944.
[2]Chhetri AS, Morrell D, Papandreou-Suppappola A, 2006. Nonmyopic sensor scheduling and its efficient implementation for target tracking applications. EURASIP J Adv Signal Process, 2006(1):031520.
[3]Fosbury AM, Crassidis JL, Singh T, et al., 2007. Ground target tracking using terrain information. Proc 10th Int Conf on Information Fusion, p.1-8.
[4]Habibi J, Mahboubi H, Aghdam AG, 2016. Distributed coverage control of mobile sensor networks subject to measurement error. IEEE Trans Autom Contr, 61(11):3330-3343.
[5]Hernandez M, Benavoli A, Graziano A, et al., 2011. Performance measures and MHT for tracking move-stop-move targets with MTI sensors. IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst, 47(2):996-1025.
[6]Katsilieris F, Driessen H, Yarovoy A, 2015. Threat-based sensor management for target tracking. IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst, 51(4):2772-2785.
[7]Li D, Sun PC, Chen W, 2016. A multi-sensor management method based on particle swarm algorithm. IEEE Information Technology, Networking, Electronic and Automation Control Conf, p.766-770.
[8]Li Y, Krakow LW, Chong EKP, et al., 2009. Approximate stochastic dynamic programming for sensor scheduling to track multiple targets. Dig Signal Process, 19(6):978-989.
[9]Liang QL, 2008. Automatic target recognition using waveform diversity in radar sensor networks. Patt Recogn Lett, 29(3):377-381.
[10]Luo JH, Tian YX, Chen Y, et al., 2021. Low altitude and small target tracking based on IMM L-M cubature Kalman filter. Proc 24th Int Conf on Information Fusion, p.1-8.
[11]Mertens M, Nickel U, 2011. GMTI tracking in the presence of Doppler and range ambiguities. Proc 14th Int Conf on Information Fusion, p.1369-1376.
[12]Misra S, Singh A, Chatterjee S, et al., 2015. QoS-aware sensor allocation for target tracking in sensor-cloud. Ad Hoc Netw, 33:140-153.
[13]Oh H, Kim S, Tsourdos A, 2015. Road-map–assisted standoff tracking of moving ground vehicle using nonlinear model predictive control. IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst, 51(2):975-986.
[14]Pang C, Shan GL, 2019. Risk-based sensor scheduling for target detection. Comput Electron Eng, 77:179-190.
[15]Shan GL, Zhang ZN, 2017. Non-myopic sensor scheduling for low radiation risk tracking using mixed POMDP. Trans Inst Meas Contr, 39(2):230-243.
[16]Shan GL, Xu GG, Qiao CL, 2020. A non-myopic scheduling method of radar sensors for maneuvering target tracking and radiation control. Def Technol, 16(1):242-250.
[17]Shi K, Chen HS, Lin Y, 2015. Probabilistic coverage based sensor scheduling for target tracking sensor networks. Inform Sci, 292:95-110.
[18]Song D, Tharmarasa R, Florea MC, et al., 2019. Multi-vehicle tracking with microscopic traffic flow model-based particle filtering. Automatica, 105:28-35.
[19]Ulmke M, Erdinc O, Willett P, 2010. GMTI tracking via the Gaussian mixture cardinalized probability hypothesis density filter. IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst, 46(4):1821-1833.
[20]Wan KF, Gao XG, Li B, et al., 2018. Using approximate dynamic programming for multi-ESM scheduling to track ground moving targets. J Syst Eng Electron, 29(1):74-85.
[21]Wang Y, Hussein II, Erwin RS, 2011. Risk-based sensor management for integrated detection and estimation. American Control Conf, p.3633-3638.
[22]Wang Y, Wang XG, Shan YZ, et al., 2020. Quantized genetic resampling particle filtering for vision-based ground moving target tracking. Aerosp Sci Technol, 103:105925.
[23]Wu WH, Liu WJ, Jiang J, et al., 2016. GM-PHD filter-based multi-target tracking in the presence of Doppler blind zone. Dig Signal Process, 52:1-12.
[24]Wu WH, Sun HM, Cai YC, et al., 2020a. MM-GLMB filter-based sensor control for tracking multiple maneuvering targets hidden in the Doppler blind zone. IEEE Trans Signal Process, 68:4555-4567.
[25]Wu WH, Sun HM, Cai YC, et al., 2020b. Tracking multiple maneuvering targets hidden in the DBZ based on the MM-GLMB filter. IEEE Trans Signal Process, 68:2912-2924.
[26]Wu WH, Sun HM, Huang ZL, et al., 2021a. Multi-GMTI fusion for Doppler blind zone suppression using PHD fusion. Signal Process, 183:108024.
[27]Wu WH, Sun HM, Huang WP, et al., 2021b. Multi-GMTI decentralized tracking via consensus LMB density fusion. Int Conf on Control, Automation and Information Sciences, p.122-129.
[28]Xu GG, Shan GL, Duan XS, 2019. Non-myopic scheduling method of mobile sensors for manoeuvring target tracking. IET Radar Sonar Navig, 13(11):1899-1908.
[29]Yang C, Blasch E, Patrick J, et al., 2010. Ground target track bias estimation using opportunistic road information. IEEE National Aerospace & Electronics Conf, p.156-163.
[30]Yu M, Oh H, Chen WH, 2016. An improved multiple model particle filtering approach for manoeuvring target tracking using airborne GMTI with geographic information. Aerosp Sci Technol, 52:62-69.
[31]Zhang S, Bar-Shalom Y, 2011. Track segment association for GMTI tracks of evasive move-stop-move maneuvering targets. IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst, 47(3):1899-1914.
[32]Zheng JH, Gao MG, 2018. Tracking ground targets with a road constraint using a GMPHD filter. Sensors, 18(8):2723.
[33]Zhou GJ, Guo ZK, Li KY, et al., 2021. Motion modeling and state estimation in Range-Doppler plane. Aerosp Sci Technol, 115:106792.
Open peer comments: Debate/Discuss/Question/Opinion
<1>