Similar articles

Abstract: The theoretical derivation from Part I (Jiang et al., 2015) has obtained the core contact force and the bending moment distribution of the external member in the single-wave core deformation mode. In addition, the design criteria of the external member and the strengthened core region (SCR) have also been obtained based on the understanding of the mechanical characteristics of the buckling-restrained brace (BRB). Based on the theoretical results from Part I, this study conducts the corresponding finite element (FE) numerical verification, and the BRB parameter analysis is also performed when the core deforms as a single-wave deformation. The influence of nine parameters on the core contact force and the external member stress is investigated. These parameters include the flexural rigidity of external member, the initial imperfection of external member, the core thickness and its width-to-thickness ratio, the pinned connector length, the external member length, the length of restrained strengthened core region with uniform section and the height of the wing-plate of the SCR, as well as the gap between the core and the external member. Lastly, the 12 examples of BRBs that are designed according to the proposed design criteria are analyzed using FE simulation, and the reliability of the theoretical derivation is also verified.

On the basis of the theoretical derivation results from Part I, this study performs a numerical verification. The influence of nine parameters on the core contact force and the external member stress is investigated. These parameters include the flexural rigidity of external member, the initial imperfection of external member, the core thickness and its width-to-thickness ratio, the pinned connector length, the external member length, the length of restrained strengthened core region with uniform section and height of wing-plate of SCR, as well as the gap between the core and the external member. Finally, twelve examples of BRBs that are designed according to the proposed design criteria are analyzed by FE simulation, and the rationality of the theoretical derivation is verified.

内核外伸铰接防屈曲支撑设计理论研究. 第二部分：数值验证

[1]Black, C.J., Makris, N., Aiken, I.D., 2004. Component testing, seismic evaluation and characterization of buckling-restrained braces. Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 130(6):880-894.

[2]Chen, C.C., Chen, S.Y., Liaw, J.J., 2001. Application of low yield strength steel on controlled plastification ductile concentrically braced frames. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 28(5):823-836.

[3]Chen, J., 2005. Principles of Steel Structure Design. Science Press, Beijing, p.210-213 (in Chinese).

[4]Chou, C., Chen, S., 2010. Subassemblage tests and finite element analyses of sandwiched buckling-restrained braces. Engineering Structures, 32(8):2108-2121.

[5]Di Sarno, L., Manfredi, G., 2010. Seismic retrofitting with buckling restrained braces: application to an existing non-ductile RC framed building. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 30(11):1279-1297.

[6]Di Sarno, L., Manfredi, G., 2012. Experimental tests on full-scale RC unretrofitted frame and retrofitted with buckling restrained braces. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 41(2):315-333.

[7]Di Sarno, L., Chiodi, R., Manfredi, G., et al., 2013. Probabilistic assessment of seismic behaviour of an existing RC building retrofitted with BRBs. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Structural Safety & Reliability (ICOSSAR), New York, USA.

[8]Fahnestock, L.A., Ricles, J.M., Sause, R., 2007. Experimental evaluation of a large-scale buckling-restrained braced frame. Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 133(9):1205-1214.

[9]Guo, Y.L., Jiang, L.X., 2010. Behavior and application of buckling-restrained braces assembled with section steels. Building Structure, 40(1):30-37 (in Chinese).

[10]Inoue, K., Sawaisumi, S., 1992. Bracing design criterion of the reinforced concrete panel including unbonded steel diagonal braces. Journal of Structural and Construction Engineering, 432(3):41-49 (in Japanese).

[11]Iwata, M., Murai, M., 2006. Buckling-restrained brace using steel mortar planks; performance evaluation as a hysteretic damper. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 35(14):1807-1818.

[12]Jiang, Z.Q., Guo, Y.L., Wang, X.A., et al., 2015. Design method of the pinned external integrated buckling-restrained braces with extended core. Part I: theoretical derivation. Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE A (Applied Physics & Engineering), 16(10):781-792.

[13]Ju, Y.K., Kim, M., Kim, J., et al., 2009. Component tests of buckling-restrained braces with unconstrained length. Engineering Structures, 31(2):507-516.

[14]Nagao, T., Takahashi, S., 1991. A study on the elasto-plastic behavior of unbonded composite bracing (Part 2: analytical studies). Journal of Structural Construction Engineering, 422(4):45-56 (in Japanese).

[15]Qiang, X., 2005. Status of the art of buckling-restrained braces in Asia. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 61(11):727-748.

[16]Tremblay, R., Bolduc, P., Neville, R., et al., 2006. Seismic testing and performance of buckling-restrained bracing systems. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 33(2):183-198.

[17]Tsai, K., Hsiao, P., 2008. Pseudo-dynamic test of a full-scale CFT/BRB frame—Part II: seismic performance of buckling-restrained braces and connections. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 37(7):1099-1115.

[18]Wigle, V.R., Fahnestock, L.A., 2010. Buckling-restrained braced frame connection performance. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 66(1):65-74.

[19]Zhao, J., Wu, B., Ou, J., 2011. A novel type of angle steel buckling-restrained brace: cyclic behavior and failure mechanism. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 40(10):1083-1102.

[20]Zhao, J., Wu, B., Ou, J., 2012a. Effect of brace end rotation on the global buckling behavior of pin-connected buckling-restrained braces with end collars. Engineering Structures, 40(5):240-253.

[21]Zhao, J., Wu, B., Ou, J., 2012b. Flexural demand on pin-connected buckling-restrained braces and design recommendations. Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 138(11):1398-1415.