Full Text:
<1456>
CLC number: R173
On-line Access: 2020-09-07
Received: 2020-05-20
Revision Accepted: 2020-08-18
Crosschecked: 2020-08-17
Cited: 0
Clicked: 2817
Retraction Note to: Ambient air pollution and adverse birth outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
| ||||||||||||||
Le-qian Guo, Yu Chen, Bai-bing Mi, Shao-nong Dang, Dou-dou Zhao, Rong Liu, Hong-li Wang, Hong Yan. Retraction Note to: Ambient air pollution and adverse birth outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University Science B, 2020, 21(9): 756-756.
@article{title="Retraction Note to: Ambient air pollution and adverse birth outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis",
author="Le-qian Guo, Yu Chen, Bai-bing Mi, Shao-nong Dang, Dou-dou Zhao, Rong Liu, Hong-li Wang, Hong Yan",
journal="Journal of Zhejiang University Science B",
volume="21",
number="9",
pages="756-756",
year="2020",
publisher="Zhejiang University Press & Springer",
doi="10.1631/jzus.B18r0122"
}
%0 Journal Article
%T Retraction Note to: Ambient air pollution and adverse birth outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
%A Le-qian Guo
%A Yu Chen
%A Bai-bing Mi
%A Shao-nong Dang
%A Dou-dou Zhao
%A Rong Liu
%A Hong-li Wang
%A Hong Yan
%J Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE B
%V 21
%N 9
%P 756-756
%@ 1673-1581
%D 2020
%I Zhejiang University Press & Springer
%DOI 10.1631/jzus.B18r0122
TY - JOUR
T1 - Retraction Note to: Ambient air pollution and adverse birth outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
A1 - Le-qian Guo
A1 - Yu Chen
A1 - Bai-bing Mi
A1 - Shao-nong Dang
A1 - Dou-dou Zhao
A1 - Rong Liu
A1 - Hong-li Wang
A1 - Hong Yan
J0 - Journal of Zhejiang University Science B
VL - 21
IS - 9
SP - 756
EP - 756
%@ 1673-1581
Y1 - 2020
PB - Zhejiang University Press & Springer
ER -
DOI - 10.1631/jzus.B18r0122
Abstract: Retraction Note to: J Zhejiang Univ-Sci B (Biomed & Biotechnol) 2019 20(3):238-252. https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.B1800122. The authors have retracted this article (Guo et al., 2019) because some data from the original literature had not been converted to appropriate units in the paper, which resulted in deviation of the meta-analysis results. For example, for the forest plot used to examine associations between PM10 exposure and the risk of adverse birth outcomes, the estimates from Brauer et al. (2008), Pedersen et al. (2013), Zhao et al. (2015), and Hansen et al. (2006) were on the originally reported scales of 1 µg/m3, 10 µg/m3, 10 µg/m3, and Inter Quartile Range, respectively. None of these estimates had been converted to 20 µg/m3 increase scale that was stated in the article. Similar problem exists in the analysis on associations between NO2 exposure and risk of adverse birth outcomes. Therefore, the results of the meta-analysis are misleading. All authors have agreed to this retraction and express their deepest apologies to the original authors, publishers, and readers.
[1]Brauer M, Lencar C, Tamburic L, et al., 2008. A cohort study of traffic-related air pollution impacts on birth outcomes. Environ Health Perspect, 116(5):680-686.
[2]Guo LQ, Chen Y, Mi BB, et al., 2019. Ambient air pollution and adverse birth outcomes: a systematic review and meta- analysis. J Zhejiang Univ-Sci B (Biomed & Biotechnol), 20(3):238-252.
[3]Hansen C, Neller A, Williams G, et al., 2006. Maternal exposure to low levels of ambient air pollution and preterm birth in Brisbane, Australia. BJOG, 113(8):935-941.
[4]Pedersen M, Giorgis-Allemand L, Bernard C, et al., 2013. Ambient air pollution and low birthweight: a European cohort study (ESCAPE). Lancet Respir Med, 1(9):695-704.
[5]Zhao N, Qiu J, Zhang YQ, et al., 2015. Ambient air pollutant PM10 and risk of preterm birth in Lanzhou, China. Environ Int, 76:71-77.
Open peer comments: Debate/Discuss/Question/Opinion
<1>