CLC number:
On-line Access: 2024-01-02
Received: 2023-03-21
Revision Accepted: 2023-04-28
Crosschecked: 2024-01-02
Cited: 0
Clicked: 728
Xiaojian JIANG, Lihong LEI, Weilian SUN, Yingming WEI, Jiayin HAN, Shuaiqi ZHONG, Xianyan YANG, Zhongru GOU, Lili CHEN. Bioceramic scaffolds with two-step internal/external modification of copper-containing polydopamine enhance antibacterial and alveolar bone regeneration capability[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University Science B, 2024, 25(1): 65-82.
@article{title="Bioceramic scaffolds with two-step internal/external modification of copper-containing polydopamine enhance antibacterial and alveolar bone regeneration capability",
author="Xiaojian JIANG, Lihong LEI, Weilian SUN, Yingming WEI, Jiayin HAN, Shuaiqi ZHONG, Xianyan YANG, Zhongru GOU, Lili CHEN",
journal="Journal of Zhejiang University Science B",
volume="25",
number="1",
pages="65-82",
year="2024",
publisher="Zhejiang University Press & Springer",
doi="10.1631/jzus.B23d0004"
}
%0 Journal Article
%T Bioceramic scaffolds with two-step internal/external modification of copper-containing polydopamine enhance antibacterial and alveolar bone regeneration capability
%A Xiaojian JIANG
%A Lihong LEI
%A Weilian SUN
%A Yingming WEI
%A Jiayin HAN
%A Shuaiqi ZHONG
%A Xianyan YANG
%A Zhongru GOU
%A Lili CHEN
%J Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE B
%V 25
%N 1
%P 65-82
%@ 1673-1581
%D 2024
%I Zhejiang University Press & Springer
%DOI 10.1631/jzus.B23d0004
TY - JOUR
T1 - Bioceramic scaffolds with two-step internal/external modification of copper-containing polydopamine enhance antibacterial and alveolar bone regeneration capability
A1 - Xiaojian JIANG
A1 - Lihong LEI
A1 - Weilian SUN
A1 - Yingming WEI
A1 - Jiayin HAN
A1 - Shuaiqi ZHONG
A1 - Xianyan YANG
A1 - Zhongru GOU
A1 - Lili CHEN
J0 - Journal of Zhejiang University Science B
VL - 25
IS - 1
SP - 65
EP - 82
%@ 1673-1581
Y1 - 2024
PB - Zhejiang University Press & Springer
ER -
DOI - 10.1631/jzus.B23d0004
Abstract: Magnesium-doped calcium silicate (CS) bioceramic scaffolds have unique advantages in mandibular defect repair; however, they lack antibacterial properties to cope with the complex oral microbiome. Herein, for the first time, the CS scaffold was functionally modified with a novel copper-containing polydopamine (PDA(Cu2+)) rapid deposition method, to construct internally modified (*P), externally modified (@PDA), and dually modified (*P@PDA) scaffolds. The morphology, degradation behavior, and mechanical properties of the obtained scaffolds were evaluated in vitro. The results showed that the CS*P@PDA had a unique micro-/nano-structural surface and appreciable mechanical resistance. During the prolonged immersion stage, the release of copper ions from the CS*P@PDA scaffolds was rapid in the early stage and exhibited long-term sustained release. The in vitro evaluation revealed that the release behavior of copper ions ascribed an excellent antibacterial effect to the CS*P@PDA, while the scaffolds retained good cytocompatibility with improved osteogenesis and angiogenesis effects. Finally, the PDA(Cu2+)-modified scaffolds showed effective early bone regeneration in a critical-size rabbit mandibular defect model. Overall, it was indicated that considerable antibacterial property along with the enhancement of alveolar bone regeneration can be imparted to the scaffold by the two-step PDA(Cu2+) modification, and the convenience and wide applicability of this technique make it a promising strategy to avoid bacterial infections on implants.
[1]BangSM, MoonHJ, KwonYD, et al., 2014. Osteoblastic and osteoclastic differentiation on SLA and hydrophilic modified SLA titanium surfaces. Clin Oral Implants Res, 25(7):831-837.
[2]de AlmeidaMS, de Oliveira FernandesGV, de OliveiraAM, et al., 2018. Calcium silicate as a graft material for bone fractures: a systematic review. J Int Med Res, 46(7):2537-2548.
[3]de Azambuja CarvalhoPH, dos Santos TrentoG, MouraLB, et al., 2019. Horizontal ridge augmentation using xenogenous bone graft—systematic review. Oral Maxillofac Surg, 23(3):271-279.
[4]DongYF, DuanHB, ZhaoNR, et al., 2018. Three-dimensional printing of β-tricalcium phosphate/calcium silicate composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Bio-Des Manuf, 1(2):146-156.
[5]DoolittleML, Ackert-BicknellCL, JonasonJH, 2021. Isolation and culture of neonatal mouse calvarial osteoblasts. In: Hilton MJ (Ed.), Skeletal Development and Repair. Humana, New York, p.425-436.
[6]EwaldA, KäppelC, VorndranE, et al., 2012. The effect of Cu(II)-loaded brushite scaffolds on growth and activity of osteoblastic cells. J Biomed Mater Res Part A, 100A(9):2392-2400.
[7]FanYJ, PhamMT, HuangCJ, 2019. Development of antimicrobial and antifouling universal coating via rapid deposition of polydopamine and zwitterionization. Langmuir, 35(5):1642-1651.
[8]FilipowskaJ, TomaszewskiKA, NiedźwiedzkiŁ, et al., 2017. The role of vasculature in bone development, regeneration and proper systemic functioning. Angiogenesis, 20(3):291-302.
[9]GaoXY, WeiMT, MaDC, et al., 2021. Engineering of a hollow-structured Cu2-xS nano-homojunction platform for near infrared-triggered infected wound healing and cancer therapy. Adv Funct Mater, 31(52):2106700.
[10]GittensRA, McLachlanT, Olivares-NavarreteR, et al., 2011. The effects of combined micron-/submicron-scale surface roughness and nanoscale features on cell proliferation and differentiation. Biomaterials, 32(13):3395-3403.
[11]HongR, KangTY, MichelsCA, et al., 2012. Membrane lipid peroxidation in copper alloy-mediated contact killing of Escherichia coli. Appl Environ Microbiol, 78(6):1776-1784.
[12]HouYH, WangWG, BartoloP, 2022. Application of additively manufactured 3D scaffolds for bone cancer treatment: a review. Bio-Des Manuf, 5(3):556-579.
[13]HuJF, YangL, YangP, et al., 2020. Polydopamine free radical scavengers. Biomater Sci, 8(18):4940-4950.
[14]International Organization for Standardization, 2012. Biological evaluation of medical devices—Part 12: Sample preparation and reference materials. ISO 10993-12:2012. International Organization for Standardization, Switzerland.
[15]JungUW, LeeJS, ParkWY, et al., 2011. Periodontal regenerative effect of a bovine hydroxyapatite/collagen block in one-wall intrabony defects in dogs: a histometric analysis. J Periodontal Implant Sci, 41(6):285-292.
[16]KassebaumNJ, BernabéE, DahiyaM, et al., 2014. Global burden of severe periodontitis in 1990‒2010: a systematic review and meta-regression. J Dent Res, 93(11):1045-1053.
[17]KaushikN, Nhat NguyenL, KimJH, et al., 2020. Strategies for using polydopamine to induce biomineralization of hydroxyapatite on implant materials for bone tissue engineering. Int J Mol Sci, 21(18):6544.
[18]KimY, NowzariH, RichSK, 2013. Risk of prion disease transmission through bovine-derived bone substitutes: a systematic review. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 15(5):645-653.
[19]KongN, LinKL, LiHY, et al., 2014. Synergy effects of copper and silicon ions on stimulation of vascularization by copper-doped calcium silicate. J Mater Chem B, 2(8):1100-1110.
[20]LeeH, DellatoreSM, MillerWM, et al., 2007. Mussel-inspired surface chemistry for multifunctional coatings. Science, 318(5849):426-430.
[21]LeiLH, YuYY, KeT, et al., 2019. The application of three-dimensional printing model and platelet-rich fibrin technology in guided tissue regeneration surgery for severe bone defects. J Oral Implantol, 45(1):35-43.
[22]LeiLH, HanJY, WenJH, et al., 2020a. Biphasic ceramic biomaterials with tunable spatiotemporal evolution for highly efficient alveolar bone repair. J Mater Chem B, 8(35):8037-8049.
[23]LeiLH, WeiYM, WangZX, et al., 2020b. Core-shell bioactive ceramic robocasting: tuning component distribution beneficial for highly efficient alveolar bone regeneration and repair. ACS Biomater Sci Eng, 6(4):2376-2387.
[24]LiB, ShuR, DaiWY, et al., 2022. Bioheterojunction-engineered polyetheretherketone implants with diabetic infectious micromilieu twin-engine powered disinfection for boosted osteogenicity. Small, 18(45):2203619.
[25]LinZJ, LiuLZ, WangW, et al., 2021. The role and mechanism of polydopamine and cuttlefish ink melanin carrying copper ion nanoparticles in antibacterial properties and promoting wound healing. Biomater Sci, 9(17):5951-5964.
[26]LiuA, SunM, ShaoHF, et al., 2016. The outstanding mechanical response and bone regeneration capacity of robocast dilute magnesium-doped wollastonite scaffolds in critical size bone defects. J Mater Chem B, 4(22):3945-3958.
[27]LiuH, QuX, TanHQ, et al., 2019. Role of polydopamine’s redox-activity on its pro-oxidant, radical-scavenging, and antimicrobial activities. Acta Biomater, 88:181-196.
[28]LiuZY, HuYX, LiuCF, et al., 2016. Surface-independent one-pot chelation of copper ions onto filtration membranes to provide antibacterial properties. Chem Commun, 52(82):12245-12248.
[29]LuWY, ShiY, XieZJ, 2023. Novel structural designs of 3D-printed osteogenic graft for rapid angiogenesis. Bio-Des Manuf, 6(1):51-73.
[30]MertensC, BraunS, KrisamJ, et al., 2019. The influence of wound closure on graft stability: an in vitro comparison of different bone grafting techniques for the treatment of one-wall horizontal bone defects. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 21(2):284-291.
[31]NemţoiA, TrandafirV, PaşcaAS, et al., 2017. Osseointegration of chemically modified sandblasted and acid-etched titanium implant surface in diabetic rats: a histological and scanning electron microscopy study. Rom J Morphol Embryol, 58(3):881-886.
[32]QinHL, WeiYM, HanJY, et al., 2022. 3D printed bioceramic scaffolds: adjusting pore dimension is beneficial for mandibular bone defects repair. J Tissue Eng Regen Med, 16(4):409-421.
[33]SantoCE, TaudteN, NiesDH, et al., 2008. Contribution of copper ion resistance to survival of Escherichia coli on metallic copper surfaces. Appl Environ Microbiol, 74(4):977-986.
[34]SantoCE, QuarantaD, GrassG, 2012. Antimicrobial metallic copper surfaces kill Staphylococcus haemolyticus via membrane damage. MicrobiologyOpen, 1(1):46-52.
[35]Sanz-SánchezI, Sanz-MartínI, Ortiz-VigónA, et al., 2022. Complications in bone-grafting procedures: classification and management. Periodontol 2000, 88(1):86-102.
[36]SteevesAJ, AtwalA, SchockSC, et al., 2016. Evaluation of the direct effects of poly(dopamine) on the in vitro response of human osteoblastic cells. J Mater Chem B, 4(18):3145-3156.
[37]SuTS, ZhengA, CaoLY, et al., 2022. Adhesion-enhancing coating embedded with osteogenesis-promoting PDA/HA nanoparticles for peri-implant soft tissue sealing and osseointegration. Bio-Des Manuf, 5(2):233-248.
[38]SunM, LiuA, ShaoHF, et al., 2016. Systematical evaluation of mechanically strong 3D printed diluted magnesium doping wollastonite scaffolds on osteogenic capacity in rabbit calvarial defects. Sci Rep, 6:34029.
[39]SunXY, LiLH, ZhangH, et al., 2021. Near-infrared light-regulated drug-food homologous bioactive molecules and photothermal collaborative precise antibacterial therapy nanoplatform with controlled release property. Adv Healthc Mater, 10(16):2100546.
[40]WangXJ, MolinoBZ, PitkänenS, et al., 2019. 3D scaffolds of polycaprolactone/copper-doped bioactive glass: architecture engineering with additive manufacturing and cellular assessments in a coculture of bone marrow stem cells and endothelial cells. ACS Biomater Sci Eng, 5(9):4496-4510.
[41]WangXL, LiuSX, LiM, et al., 2016. The synergistic antibacterial activity and mechanism of multicomponent metal ions-containing aqueous solutions against Staphylococcus aureus. J Inorg Biochem, 163:214-220.
[42]WarnesSL, KeevilCW, 2011. Mechanism of copper surface toxicity in vancomycin-resistant enterococci following wet or dry surface contact. Appl Environ Microbiol, 77(17):6049-6059.
[43]WeiYM, WangZX, HanJY, et al., 2022. Modularized bioceramic scaffold/hydrogel membrane hierarchical architecture beneficial for periodontal tissue regeneration in dogs. Biomater Res, 26:68.
[44]WojcieszakD, MazurM, KaliszM, et al., 2017. Influence of Cu, Au and Ag on structural and surface properties of bioactive coatings based on titanium. Mater Sci Eng C, 71:1115-1121.
[45]WuCT, ZhouYH, XuMC, et al., 2013. Copper-containing mesoporous bioactive glass scaffolds with multifunctional properties of angiogenesis capacity, osteostimulation and antibacterial activity. Biomaterials, 34(2):422-433.
[46]WuRH, LiYF, ShenMD, et al., 2021. Bone tissue regeneration: the role of finely tuned pore architecture of bioactive scaffolds before clinical translation. Bioact Mater, 6(5):1242-1254.
[47]XiaoYQ, CaoYJ, XinBJ, et al., 2018. Fabrication and characterization of electrospun cellulose/polyacrylonitrile nanofibers with Cu(II) ions. Cellulose, 25(5):2955-2963.
[48]XieJJ, YangXY, ShaoHF, et al., 2016. Simultaneous mechanical property and biodegradation improvement of wollastonite bioceramic through magnesium dilute doping. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater, 54:60-71.
[49]XuQ, ChangML, ZhangY, et al., 2020. PDA/CU bioactive hydrogel with “hot ions effect” for inhibition of drug-resistant bacteria and enhancement of infectious skin wound healing. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 12(28):31255-31269.
[50]YangYW, ChengY, DengF, et al., 2021. A bifunctional bone scaffold combines osteogenesis and antibacterial activity via in situ grown hydroxyapatite and silver nanoparticles. Bio-Des Manuf, 4(3):452-468.
[51]YangZF, FengFF, JiangWW, et al., 2022. Designment of polydopamine/bacterial cellulose incorporating copper (II) sulfate as an antibacterial wound dressing. Biomater Adv, 134:112591.
[52]YeJ, YaoQQ, MoAC, et al., 2011. Effects of an antibacterial membrane on osteoblast-like cells in vitro. Int J Nanomedicine, 6:1853-1861.
[53]ZhangC, OuY, LeiWX, et al., 2016. CuSO4/H2O2-induced rapid deposition of polydopamine coatings with high uniformity and enhanced stability. Angew Chem Int Ed, 55(9):3054-3057.
[54]ZhaoMH, ChenXP, WangQ, 2014. Wetting failure of hydrophilic surfaces promoted by surface roughness. Sci Rep, 4:5376.
[55]ZhouL, LiX, WangKB, et al., 2020. CuII-loaded polydopamine coatings with in situ nitric oxide generation function for improved hemocompatibility. Regen Biomater, 7(2):153-160.
[56]ZhuZQ, GaoQ, LongZY, et al., 2021. Polydopamine/poly(sulfobetaine methacrylate) Co-deposition coatings triggered by CuSO4/H2O2 on implants for improved surface hemocompatibility and antibacterial activity. Bioact Mater, 6(8):2546-2556.
Open peer comments: Debate/Discuss/Question/Opinion
<1>